Skip to main content
Log in

Machining Characteristics Evaluation of Al7075–TiB2 In Situ Composite Using Abrasive Water Jet Machining with Varied Test Parameters

  • ORIGINAL CONTRIBUTION
  • Published:
Journal of The Institution of Engineers (India): Series D Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The study delves into the abrasive water jet (AWJ) cutting of an Al7075–TiB2 metal matrix composite that was synthesized in situ. The primary goal is to investigate how variations in three key process parameters, namely, stand-off distance (SOD) ranging from 0.5 to 2.5 mm, abrasive flow rate (100 to 300 g min), and traverse speed (100 to 500 mm min), affect three critical performance metrics: volumetric material removal rate (VMRR), dimensional accuracy, and surface roughness (SR). The study's findings were represented graphically, highlighting the relationships between these responses and the aforementioned process parameters. Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) was also used to examine the machined surfaces. It was discovered that increasing traverse speed resulted in significant increases in surface roughness, VMRR, and dimensional errors. An increase in the SOD, on the other hand, resulted in an increase in surface roughness, VMRR, and a decrease in dimensional accuracy. Furthermore, increasing the abrasive flow rate resulted in lower surface roughness and dimensional accuracy while achieving a higher VMRR.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14
Fig. 15
Fig. 16

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. V. Songmene, R. Khettabi, I. Zaghbani, J. Kouman, A. Djabarn, Machining and Machinability of Aluminium Alloys (E core de technologies Superieure (ETS), Department of Mecahanical Engineering, Quebec, Canada, 2011)

    Google Scholar 

  2. W. Konig, D. Erinski, Machining and machinability of aluminium cast alloys. Ann. CIRP 32, 535–540 (1983)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. S. Natarajan, R. Narayanaswamy, K. Babu, G. Dinesh, B. Anil Kumar, K. Shivaprasad, Sliding wear behavior of Al6063-TiB2 in-situ composites at elevated temperatures. Mater. Des. 30, 2521–2531 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. T.V. Christy, N. Murugan, S. Kumar, A comparative study on microstructures and mechanical properties of Al-6061 alloy and the MMC Al 6062/TiB2/12p. J. Miner. Mater. Charact. Eng. 9(1), 57–65 (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  5. C.S. Ramesh, A. Ahmed, B.H. Chanabasappa, R. Keshavmurthy, Development of Al6063-TiB2 in-situ composites. Mater. Des. 31, 2230–2236 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. C. Rajaravia, P.R. Lakshminarayanan, Experimental and FEA of fracture toughness on in-situ Al/TiB2 MMCs in different mould conditions. IRJET 03(01), 828–832 (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  7. T.V. Christy, N. Murugan, S. Kumar, A comparative study on the microstructures and mechanical properties of Al 6061 alloy and the MMC Al 6061/TiB2/12p. J. Miner. Mater. Charact. Eng. 9(1), 27–65 (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  8. C. Narayanan, R. Balz, D.A. Weiss, K.C. Heiniger, Modelling of abrasive particle energy in water jet machining. J. Mater. Process. Technol. 213(12), 2201–2210 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. D.R.K. Preeti, R.D. Gupta, V. Gupta, Measuring material removal rate of marble by using abrasive water jet machining. IOSR J. Mech. Civ. Eng. IOSR-JMCE 2015, 45–49 (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  10. G. Yang, Forecast surface quality of abrasive water jet cutting based on neural network. J. Theor. Appl. Inf. Technol. 47(3), 1087–1091 (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  11. M. Madic, M. Radovanovic, Mathematical modeling and analysis of AWJ cutting of carbon steel S275JR using ANN. AJME 9(2), 49–54 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  12. P. Jankovic, T. Igic, D. Nikodijevic, process parameters effects on material removal mechanism and cut quality of abrasive water jet machining. Theor. Appl. Mech. 40, 227–291 (2012)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  13. A. Peric, Abrasive grain breakage process during the high pressure water jet formation. WJTA–IMCA Conference (Expo, Texas, 2011)

  14. G. Yamamoto, M. Onodera, K. Koizumi, J. Watanabe, H. Okuda, F. Tanaka, T. Okabe, Considering the stress concentration of fiber surfaces in the prediction of the tensile strength of unidirectional carbon fiber-reinforced plastic composites. Compos. Part A Appl. Sci. Manuf. 121, 499–509 (2019)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. H. Shahverdi, M. Zolwor, S. Mouravi, Numerical simulation of AWJ cutting process using the SPH and ALE methods. IJADMT 15(1), 43–50 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  16. A.W. Momber, R. Kovecevic, Test parameters analysis in AWJC of Rocklike material. Int. J. Rock Mech. Min. Sci. 34(1), 17–25 (1997)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. J.T. Kavya, R. Keshavamurthy, G.S. Pradeep Kumar, Studies on parametric optimization for abrasive water jet machining of Al7075-TiB2 in-situ composite. IOP Conf. Ser. Mater. Sci. Eng. 149, 012024 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. J.M. Llanto, M. Tolouei-Rad, A. Vafadar, M. Aamir, Recent progress trend on abrasive waterjet cutting of metallic materials: a review. Appl. Sci. 11, 3344 (2021). https://doi.org/10.3390/app11083344

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. K.B. Mardi, A.R. Dixit, A. Pramanik, P. Hvizdos, A. Mallick, A. Nag, S. Hloch, Surface topography analysis of mg-based composites with different nanoparticle contents disintegrated using abrasive water jet. Materials 14, 5471 (2021)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. M. Mohamed Makki, B. Chokri, Experimental, analytical, and finite element study of stress concentration factors for composite materials. J. Compos. Mater. 51(11), 1583–1594 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. A. Perec, A. Fajdek-Bieda, F. Pude, A. Radomska-Zalas, Process optimization by applying the response surface methodology (RSM) to the abrasive suspension water jet cutting of phenolic composites. Facta Univ. 20, 1–16 (2022)

    Google Scholar 

  22. P. Jankovic, T. Igic, D. Nikodijevic, Process parameters effect on material removal mechanism and cut quality of abrasive water jet machining. Theor. Appl. Mech. 40, 277–291 (2013)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

This research work has not received any funding.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to R. Keshavamurthy.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

Authors hereby declared that there is no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Kavya, J.T., Keshavamurthy, R., Ravishankar, M.K. et al. Machining Characteristics Evaluation of Al7075–TiB2 In Situ Composite Using Abrasive Water Jet Machining with Varied Test Parameters. J. Inst. Eng. India Ser. D (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40033-023-00597-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40033-023-00597-1

Keywords

Navigation