Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Pit Optimization for Improved NPV and Life of Mine in Heterogeneous Iron Ore Deposit

  • Original Contribution
  • Published:
Journal of The Institution of Engineers (India): Series D Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Operations planning and management of a large open pit mine is an enormous and complex task, particularly for mines having long life. The long-term planning of open pit mine is a dynamic process and should be reviewed periodically for enhancing the NPV and life of mine. Pit optimization through soft computing can be gainfully applied to resolve a number of important problems that arise in developing suitable planning strategies and management of a mine. Pit optimization starts with the assumption of initial production capacities and the estimates for the related costs and commodity prices. Once the economic parameters are known, the analysis of the ultimate pit limits of the mine is undertaken to determine the portion of the deposit that can be mined economically and safely from geotechnical stability view point. In this research, pit optimization for a heterogeneous iron ore deposit (Deposit-A) has been carried out successfully using Whittle Software. The key aspect investigated was the optimal pit shell across a range of selling prices, as it enables understanding the characteristics of the deposit and potential development strategies considering the areas of greater value. The methodology can be very well utilized when fluctuations in the selling price occur, for predicting the future selling price of the commodity and also strategizing mining plan. For the deposit investigated, it was found that the mine is likely to generate final product of 66.55 MT of Lump Ore (+ 10 mm − 150 mm) and Fines Ore 156.45 MT (− 10 mm) during the life of the mine. The NPV is found to be highly sensitive to the price of Fine ore as quantity of fines in total ore body is around 70%. Except waste, all ore types, no matter how inferior the grade is having (around 10 MT of low grade coming in between Fe @ 45% and Fe @ 25% can be also utilized), are mineable and can be suitably blended to give a product mix of Fe @ 61.68% and more.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. C.C Popoff, Computing reserves of mineral deposits: principles and conventional methods. [Washington] U. S. Dept. of the Interior, Bureau of Mines (1966)

  2. W.A. Hustrulid, M. Kuchta, R.K. Martin, Open pit mine planning and design, 3rd edn. (CRC Press, Boca Raton, 2013)

    Google Scholar 

  3. N. Boland, I. Dumitrescu, G. Froyland, A.M. Gleixnerc, LP-based disaggregation approaches to solving the open pit mining production scheduling problem with block processing selectivity. Comput. Oper. Res. 36, 1064–1089 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. K. Dagdelen, E. Topal, M. Kutchta, in Mine Planning and Equipment Selection, ed. by T. Michalakopoulos (Routledge, London, 2000). https://doi.org/10.1201/9780203747124

  5. G.F. Sepúlveda, P.J. Álvarez, J.B. Bedoya, Stochastic optimization in mine planning scheduling. Comput Oper Res 115, 104823 (2020)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  6. L. Martinez, J. McKibben, Understanding real options in mine project valua- tion: a simple perspective. in Fourth International Conference Min. Innov, pp. 23–25 (2010)

  7. B. King, Optimal mining practice in strategic planning. J. Min. Sci. 47(2), 243–247 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. G. Franco, J. Branch, P. Jaramillo, Planeamiento de minas a cielo abierto me- diante optimización estocástica. Bol. Cienc. Tierra 1(31), 107–113 (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  9. R. Dimitrakopoulos (ed.), Stochastic Mine Planning - Methods, Examples and Value in a Uncertain World (Springer International Publishing, 2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-69320-0_9

  10. J. Birge, F. Louveaux, Introtuction to Stochastic Programming, 1st edn. (Springer, New York, 1997)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  11. H. Karimi, N. Duffie, S. Dashkovskiy, Local capacity control for production networks of autonomous work systems with time-varying delays. Proc Eur Control Conf 2009, 2378–2383 (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  12. S. Jamalan, F. Rashidinejad, Compare methods of fix lead, Milawa NPV and Milawa balance algorithm in optimizing the production of open pit mines with whittel software. Open J Geol. (2017). https://doi.org/10.4236/ojg.2017.75041901

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. U.K. Behera, N.S. Chakravarthi, Performance analysis with data envelopment analysis (DEA). J. Mines Metals Fuels 54(12), 526–529 (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  14. S.K. Sinha, Thesis Entitled Planning Strategies for Enhancing Mine Life vis-à-vis NPV for an Heterogeneous Iron Ore Deposit (Indian Institute of Technology (Indian School of Mines), Dhanbad, 2018)

    Google Scholar 

  15. A. Rimele, R. Dimitrakopoulos, M. Gamache, dynamic stochastic programming approach for open-pit mine planning with geological and commodity price uncertainty. Resour Policy 65, 101570 (2020)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. G. Whittle, in Orebody Modelling and Strategic Mine Planning: Uncertainty and Risk Management Modelsed, by R. Dimitrakopoulos (AusIMM Spectrum Series, 2007), pp. 331–336

  17. A.M. Newman, E. Rubio, R. Caro, A. Weintraub, K. Eurek, A review of operations research in mine planning. INFORMS J. 40(3), 222–245 (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  18. M. Osanloo, J. Gholamnejad, B. Karimi, Long-term open pit mine production planning: a review of models and algorithms. Int. J. Min. Reclam. Environ. 22(1), 3–35 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1080/17480930601118947

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. N. Boland, I. Dumitrescu, G. Froyland, A. Gleixner, LP-based disaggregation approaches to solving the open pit mining production scheduling problem with block processing selectivity. Comput. Oper. Res. 36(4), 1064–1089 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. S. Ramazan, The new fundamental tree algorithm for production scheduling of open pit mines. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 177(2), 1153–1166 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. J. Whittle, A decade of open pit mine planning and optimisation—the craft of turning algorithms into packages. in Proceedings of the 28th International Symposium on Application of Computers and Operations Research in the Mineral Industry (APCOM), pp. 15–24 (1999)

  22. R. Dimitrakopoulos (ed.), Advances in applied strategic mine planning (Springer, Heidelberg, 2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-69320-0

    Book  Google Scholar 

  23. M.E. Gershon, Optimal mine production scheduling evaluation of large scale mathematical programming approaches. Int. J. Min. Eng. 1, 315–329 (1983)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. P.A. Dowd, Risk assessment in reserve estimation and open-pit planning. Trans. Inst. Min. Metall. 103, A148–A154 (1994)

    Google Scholar 

  25. M. Godoy, The effective management of geological risk in long-term production scheduling of open pit mines. PhD Thesis, University of Queensland, Qld, Australia (2002)

  26. M. Godoy, R. Dimitrakopoulos, Managing risk and waste mining in long-term production scheduling. SME Trans. 316, 43–50 (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  27. S.A.A. Sabour, R. Dimitrakopoulos, Accounting for joint ore supply, metal price and exchange rate uncertainties in mine design. Adv. Orebody Model Strat. Mine Plann. AusIMM Spectr. Ser. 17, 29–34 (2007)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The view expressed in this paper is that of Authors and not necessarily the organization they belong to.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. DGM (Mining Planning), National Mineral Development Corporation Limited, Hydrabad, India

    S. K. Sinha

  2. Indian Institute of Technology (Indian School of Mines), Dhanbad, India

    B. S. Choudhary

Authors
  1. S. K. Sinha
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. B. S. Choudhary
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to B. S. Choudhary.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

On behalf of all authors, the corresponding author states that there is no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Sinha, S.K., Choudhary, B.S. Pit Optimization for Improved NPV and Life of Mine in Heterogeneous Iron Ore Deposit. J. Inst. Eng. India Ser. D 101, 253–264 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40033-020-00236-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40033-020-00236-z

Keywords

Search

Navigation