Skip to main content
Log in

Application of Multi-Criteria ABC Inventory Classification Approaches to Gearbox Manufacturing Industry

  • Original Contribution
  • Published:
Journal of The Institution of Engineers (India): Series C Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In multi-criteria ABC inventory classification, employing a compensatory approach allows an item with low scores in one or multiple essential criteria to be assigned to a higher category. Therefore, non-compensation must be checked in multi-criteria ABC analysis. This paper applies both compensatory and non-compensatory methods such as Grey Relational Analysis, Evaluation Based on Distance from Average Solution and ELimination Et Choix Traduisant la REalite for multi-criteria inventory classification. The proposed study employs a fuzzy analytic hierarchy processes to evaluate the significance of qualitative criteria and sub-criteria by allocating suitable weights to each of them. Weighting factors associated with various classification criteria are calculated using principal component analysis. Service-cost inventory is studied using empirical data from three multi-criteria inventory classification methods. A sensitivity analysis is conducted to assess the effect of standard deviation and holding cost price uncertainty on inventory performance. The integrated methodology is illustrated through a case study of gearbox manufacturing.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

The data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author, upon reasonable request.

References

  1. E. Isen, S. Boran, Arab. J. Sci. Eng. 43, 3229 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. O. Cakir, M. Canbolat, Expert Syst. Appl. 35, 1367 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. J. Park, H. Bae, J. Bae, Comput. Ind. Eng. 76, 40 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. S.M. Hatefi, S.A. Torabi, P. Bagheri, Int. J. Prod. Res. 52, 776 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. N. Nariswari, D. Bamford, B. Dehe, Prod. Plan. Control 30, 329 (2019)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. B. Mallick, S. Das, B. Sarkar, S. Das, Decis. Sci. Lett. 8, 455 (2019)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. W.L. Ng, Eur. J. Oper. Res. 177, 344 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. A. Hadi-Vencheh, Eur. J. Oper. Res. 201, 962 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. R. Ramanathan, Comput. Oper. Res. 33, 695 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. P. Zhou, L. Fan, Eur. J. Oper. Res. 182, 1488 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Q. Lei, J. Chen, and Q. Zhou, in Adv. Neural Networks—ISNN 2005. ISNN 2005. Lect. Notes Comput. Sci. (2005), pp. 1058–1063.

  12. A. Bhattacharya, B. Sarkar, S. Mukherjee, Int. J. Prod. Res. 45, 3405 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. F. Arikan, S. Citak, Int. J. Inf. Technol. Decis. Mak. 16, 315 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. M.Z. Babai, T. Ladhari, I. Lajili, Int. J. Prod. Res. 53, 1 (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  15. M. Ghorabaee, E. Zavadskas, L. Olfat, Z. Turskis, Informatica 26, 435 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. A. Hadi-Vencheh, A. Mohamadghasemi, Expert Syst. Appl. 38, 3346 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. G. Kabir, M.A.A. Hasin, Int. J. Ind. Syst. Eng. 14, 74 (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  18. A. Molenaers, H. Baets, L. Pintelon, G. Waeyenbergh, Int. J. Prod. Econ. 140, 570 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. E. Eraslan and Y. Tansel, Evol. Syst. 1 (2019).

  20. M. Ben Jeddou, J. Adv. Manag. Sci. 2, 181 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. J. Rezaei, S. Dowlatshahi, Int. J. Prod. Res. 48, 7107 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. R. Shamsaddini, S. Vesal, K. Nawase, Int. J. Ind. Syst. Eng. 19, 239 (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  23. Z. Shanshan, F. Yelin, L. Keung, L. Liang, J. Syst. Sci. Complex. 30, 857 (2017)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  24. J. Liu, X. Liao, W. Zhao, N. Yang, Omega (United Kingdom) 61, 19 (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  25. G. Kabir, M. Ahsan Akhtar Hasin, Int. J. Ind. Eng. Comput. 3, 123 (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  26. V. Singh, V. Kumar, V.B. Singh, Decis. Anal. J. 6, 100159 (2023)

    Google Scholar 

  27. H. Raharjo, D. Endah, Qual. Eng. 18, 39 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. J. Chen, Int. J. Prod. Res. 50, 1702 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. S. Datta, G. Nandi, A. Bandyopadhyay, P.K. Pal, Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol. 45, 276 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Jagadish, A. Ray, Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol. 87, 1299 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Q. Iqbal, D. Malzahn, and L. E. Whitman, Adv. Decis. Sci. 2017 (2017).

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors express their appreciation to the managers at Kavitsu Transmissions Pvt. Ltd. for their valuable assistance throughout the study and for kindly supplying the essential resources needed to gather the necessary data.

Funding

This research did not receive financial support from any specific grants provided by public, commercial, or not-for-profit organizations.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Anand S. Shivade.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Shivade, A.S., Sapkal, S.U. Application of Multi-Criteria ABC Inventory Classification Approaches to Gearbox Manufacturing Industry. J. Inst. Eng. India Ser. C 105, 271–297 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40032-024-01025-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40032-024-01025-3

Keywords

Navigation