Advertisement

Investigating the Effect of Approach Angle and Nose Radius on Surface Quality of Inconel 718

Original Contribution
  • 57 Downloads

Abstract

This experimental work presents a surface quality evaluation of a Nickel-Cr-Fe based Inconel 718 superalloy, which has many applications in the aero engine and turbine components. However, during machining, the early wear of tool leads to decrease in surface quality. The coating on cutting tool plays a significant role in increasing the wear resistance and life of the tool. In this work, the aim is to study the surface quality of Inconel 718 with TiAlN-coated carbide tools. Influence of various geometrical parameters (tool nose radius, approach angle) and machining variables (cutting velocity, feed rate) on the quality of machined surface (surface roughness) was determined by using central composite design (CCD) matrix. The mathematical model of the same was developed. Analysis of variance was used to find the significance of the parameters. Results showed that the tool nose radius and feed were the main active factors. The present experiment accomplished that TiAlN-coated carbide inserts result in better surface quality as compared with uncoated carbide inserts.

Keywords

Approach angle Inconel 718 Response surface methodology Surface roughness Tool nose radius 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The author is thankful to the IKG Punjab Technical University, Kapurthala (Punjab), India for his support in the research area.

References

  1. 1.
    R. Arunachalam, M.A. Mannan, Machinability of nickel-based high temperature alloys. Mach. Sci. Technol. 4, 127–168 (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    D. Dudzinski, A. Devillez, A. Moufki, D. Larrouquere, V. Zerrouki, J. Vigneau, A review of developments towards dry and high speed machining of Inconel 718 alloy. Int. J. Mach. Tools Manuf. 44(4), 439–456 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    J.R. Davis (ed.), Nickel, Cobalt, and Their Alloys (ASM International, Materials Park, 2000)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    H.Z. Li, X.Q. Chen, in Aerospace materials handbook. Tool condition monitoring in machining superalloys, vol. 77, ed. by Z. Sam, D. Zhao (CRC Press, 2016)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    E.O. Ezugwu, Z.M. Wang, A.R. Machado, The machinability of nickel-based alloys: a review. J. Mater. Process. Technol. 86(1), 1–6 (1999)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Y.S. Liao, R.H. Shiue, Carbide tool wear mechanism in turning of Inconel 718 superalloy. Wear 193(1), 16–24 (1996)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    A. Devillez, G. Le Coz, S. Dominiak, D. Dudzinski, Dry machining of Inconel 718, workpiece surface integrity. J. Mater. Process. Technol. 211(10), 1590–1598 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Y. Deshpande, A. Andhare, N.K. Sahu, Estimation of surface roughness using cutting parameters, force, sound, and vibration in turning of Inconel 718, J. Braz. Soc. Mech. Sci. Eng. 1–10 (2017).  https://doi.org/10.1007/s40430-017-0819-4
  9. 9.
    S.M. Darwish, The impact of the tool material and the cutting parameters on surface roughness of supermet 718 nickel superalloy. J. Mater. Process. Technol. 97(1), 10–18 (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    D.M. D’Addona, S.J. Raykar, M.M. Narke, High speed machining of Inconel 718: tool wear and surface roughness analysis. Proc. CIRP 62, 269–274 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    F. Jafarian, D. Umbrello, S. Golpayegani, Z. Darake, Experimental investigation to optimize tool life and surface roughness in Inconel 718 machining. Mater. Manuf. Processes 31(13), 1683–1691 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    A. Thakur, S. Gangopadhyay, State-of-the-art in surface integrity in machining of nickel-based super alloys. Int. J. Mach. Tools Manuf. 100, 25–54 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Y.K. Chou, H. Song, Tool nose radius effects on finish hard turning. J. Mater. Process. Technol. 148(2), 259–268 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    J.W. Ma, F.J. Wang, Z.Y. Jia, Y.Y. Gao, Machining parameter optimization in high-speed milling for Inconel 718 curved surface. Mater. Manuf. Processes 31(13), 1692–1699 (2015)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    A.R. Sharman, J.I. Hughes, K. Ridgway, The effect of tool nose radius on surface integrity and residual stresses when turning Inconel 718™. J. Mater. Process. Technol. 216, 123–132 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Z. Huang, S. He, Z. Kejia, X. Zhang, H. Ding, An analysis of cutting parameters, coated materials and nose radii on residual stresses when turning Inconel 718. Proc. CIRP 46, 368–371 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    R.M. Arunachalam, M.A. Mannan, A.C. Spowage, Residual stress and surface roughness when facing age hardened Inconel 718 with CBN and ceramic cutting tools. Int. J. Mach. Tools Manuf. 44, 879–887 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    E.O. Ezugwu, S.H. Tang, Surface abuse when machining cast iron (G-17) and nickel-base superalloy (Inconel 718) with ceramic tools. J. Mater. Process. Technol. 55(2), 63–69 (1995)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    E.O. Ezugwu, Z.M. Wang, A.R. Machado, The machinability of nickel-based alloys: a review. J. Mater. Process. Technol. 86(1), 1–6 (1999)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    A. Thakur, S. Gangopadhyay, A. Mohanty, K. Maity, Experimental assessment on performance of TiN/TiCN/Al2O3/ZrCN coated tool during dry machining of Nimonic C-263. Int. J. Mach. Mach. Mater. 18, 452–465 (2016)Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    I. Ucun, K. Aslantas, F. Bedir, The performance of DLC-coated and uncoated ultra-fine carbide tools in micromilling of Inconel 718. Precis. Eng. 41, 135–144 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    A. Thakur, S. Gangopadhyay, Dry machining of nickel-based super alloy as a sustainable alternative using TiN/TiAlN coated tool. J. Clean. Prod. 129, 256–268 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    S.L. Soo, S.A. Khan, D.K. Aspinwall, P. Harden, A.L. Mantle, G. Kappmeyer, D. Pearson, R. M’Saoubi, High speed turning of Inconel 718 using PVD-coated PCBN tools. CIRP Ann. Manuf. Technol. 65(1), 89–92 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    American National Standards Institute, Tool-Life Testing with Single Point Turning Tools. (American Society of Mechanical Engineers, 1986)Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    D.C. Montgomery, Design and Analysis of Experiments, 7th edn. (Wiley, New Delhi, 2012)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Institution of Engineers (India) 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.IKG Punjab Technical UniversityKapurthalaIndia
  2. 2.Beant College of Engineering and TechnologyGurdaspurIndia

Personalised recommendations