Skip to main content
Log in

An Application of Six Sigma to Reduce Supplier Quality Cost

  • Case Study
  • Published:
Journal of The Institution of Engineers (India): Series C Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This article presents an application of Six Sigma to reduce supplier quality cost in manufacturing industry. Although there is a wider acceptance of Six Sigma in many organizations today, there is still a lack of in-depth case study of Six Sigma. For the present research the case study methodology was used. The company decided to reduce quality cost and improve selected processes using Six Sigma methodologies. Regarding the fact that there is a lack of case studies dealing with Six Sigma especially in individual manufacturing organization this article could be of great importance also for the practitioners. This paper discusses the quality and productivity improvement in a supplier enterprise through a case study. The paper deals with an application of Six Sigma define–measure–analyze–improve–control methodology in an industry which provides a framework to identify, quantify and eliminate sources of variation in an operational process in question, to optimize the operation variables, improve and sustain performance viz. process yield with well-executed control plans. Six Sigma improves the process performance (process yield) of the critical operational process, leading to better utilization of resources, decreases variations and maintains consistent quality of the process output.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11

References

  1. http://www.aberdeen.com/

  2. Kai Yang, Basem El-Haik, Design for Six Sigma—A Road Map for Product Development (The McGraw-Hill Publication, NY, 2003)

    Google Scholar 

  3. P.S. Pande, R.P. Neuman, R.R. Cavanagh, The Six Sigma Way Team Fieldbook (McGraw Hill, USA, 2002)

    Google Scholar 

  4. R. Banuelas, J. Antony, Critical success factors for the successful implementation of Six Sigma projects in organizations. TQM Mag. 14(2), 92–99 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. AA Al Salem, An Integrated Model for Supplier Quality Evaluation, thesis, 2012

  6. R. Snee, Six Sigma: the evolution of 100 years of business improvement methodology. Int. J. Six Sigma Compet. Adv. 1(1), 4–20 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. S. Cox, Quality Improvement Methodology (Durham University, Durham, 2009)

    Google Scholar 

  8. J. Campanella, Principles of Quality Costs, 3rd edn. (ASQ Quality Press, Wisconsin, 1999)

    Google Scholar 

  9. J. Antony, R. Banuelas, Six sigma: a business strategy for manufacturing organization. Manuf. Eng. 8(3), 119–121 (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  10. J. Antony, Some pros and cons of six sigma: an academic perspective. TQM Mag. 16(4), 303–306 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. J. De Mast, W.A.J. Schippers, R.J.M.M. Does, E.R. van den Heuvel, Steps and strategies in process improvement. Q. Reliab. Eng. Int. 16(4), 301–311 (2000)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. T. Goh, M. Xie, Improving on the Six Sigma paradigm. TQM Mag. 16(4), 235–240 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. C.A. Hendricks, R.L. Kelbaugh, Implementing Six Sigma at GE. J. Q. Particip. 21(4), 48–53 (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  14. M.G. Aboelmaged, Six sigma quality: a structured review and implications for future research. Int. J. Q. Reliab. Manag. 27(3), 268–317 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Lokpriya Mohanrao Gaikwad.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Gaikwad, L.M., Teli, S.N., Majali, V.S. et al. An Application of Six Sigma to Reduce Supplier Quality Cost. J. Inst. Eng. India Ser. C 97, 93–107 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40032-015-0200-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40032-015-0200-2

Keywords

Navigation