Skip to main content
Log in

Frame Shuffling Forgery Detection Method for MPEG-Coded Video

  • ORIGINAL CONTRIBUTION
  • Published:
Journal of The Institution of Engineers (India): Series B Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Frame duplication and frame shuffling represent prevalent methods employed by forgers to manipulate digital video content, aiming to conceal or emphasize specific activities within the video. While several forensic techniques have been developed to address frame duplication forgery, frame shuffling forgery has received limited attention, resulting in a gap in detection methods. This paper introduces a novel forensic framework integrating motion vector analysis and scale-invariant transform features to effectively detect and locate frame shuffling forgeries in moving picture expert group (MPEG)-coded videos. The proposed algorithm’s performance is rigorously assessed using precision rate, recall rate, and detection accuracy metrics across 15 test videos. Remarkably, the algorithm achieves an average detection accuracy of 100%, signifying its exceptional precision in identifying forgeries. Additionally, the algorithm demonstrates efficiency, with an average simulation time of only 36 s, underscoring its effectiveness in real-time forensic applications.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

Explore related subjects

Discover the latest articles, news and stories from top researchers in related subjects.

References

  1. K. Sitara, B.M. Mehtre, Digital video tampering detection: an overview of passive techniques. Digit. Investig. 18, 8–22 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. R.D. Singh, N. Agarwal, Video content authentication techniques: a comprehensive survey. Multimed. Syst. 24, 211–240 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00530-017-0538-9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. S. Kingra, N. Aggarwal, R.D. Singh, Video inter-frame forgery detection: a survey. Indian J. Sci. Technol. (2016). https://doi.org/10.17485/ijst/2016/v9i44/105142

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. N.A. Shelke, S.S. Kasana, A comprehensive survey on passive techniques for digital video forgery detection. Multimed. Tools Appl. 80, 6247–6310 (2021)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. S. Fadl, Qi. Han, Li. Qiong, Exposing video inter-frame forgery via histogram of oriented gradients and motion energy image. Multidimens. Syst. Signal Process. 31(4), 1365–1384 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11045-020-00711-6

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. B. Aishwarya, P.V. Deepa, Copy-Move Forgery Detection in Video Forensics using Optical Flow for Coarse-To-Fine Detection, Int. J. Recent Trends Eng. Res. (2019). doi: 0.23883/IJRTER.CONF.20190304.002.VDFJ0

  7. G. Ulutas, B. Ustubioglu, M. Ulutas, V. Nabiyev, Frame duplication/mirroring detection method with binary features. IET Image Proc. 11(5), 333–342 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. G. Ulutas, B. Ustubioglu, M. Ulutas, V.V. Nabiyev, Frame duplication detection based on bow model. Multimed. Syst. 24(5), 549–567 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. B. Ustubioglu, G. Ulutas, V. V. Nabiyev, M. Ulutas and A. Ustubioglu, A fast detection method for frame duplication forgery based on correlation. In: 25th signal processing and communications applications conference (SIU), Antalya, (2017), pp. 1–4

  10. I. Bozkurt, M.H. Bozkurt, G. Ulutas, A new video forgery detection approach based on forgery line. Turk. J. Electr. Eng. Comput. Sci. 25(6), 4558–4574 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. S. Fadl, A. Megahed, Q. Han, Frame duplication and shuffling forgery detection technique in surveillance videos based on temporal average and gray level co-occurrence matrix. Multimed. Tools Appl. 79(4), 17619–17643 (2020)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. G. Ulutas, B. Ustubioglu, M. Ulutas, V. Nabiyev, Video forgery detection method based on local difference binary. Pamukkale Univ. J. Eng. Sci. 26(5), 983–992 (2020)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. S. Mohiuddin, S. Malakar, R. Sarkar, Duplicate frame detection in forged videos using sequence matching computational intelligence in communications and business analytics, vol. 1406 (Springer, Cham, 2021)

    Google Scholar 

  14. H. Ren, W. Atwa, H. Zhang, S. Muhammad, M. Emam, Frame duplication forgery detection and localization algorithm based on the improved Levenshtein distance, Scientific programming approaches to deep learning for source code transformation, Volume 2021, July 2021

  15. C. Long, A. Basharat, A. Hoogs, Video frame deletion and duplication, advances in computer vision and pattern recognition (Springer, Singapore, 2022)

    Google Scholar 

  16. J. Liba Manopriya, P. Arockia Jansirani, Interframe video forgery detection and localization using histogram-oriented gradients for surveillance videos, INFOCOMP, 22, 1, June, 2023

  17. S. Fadl, Q. Han, Q. Li, CNN spatiotemporal features and fusion for surveillance video forgery detection. Signal Process.: Image Commun. 90, 116066 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.image.2020.116066

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. M.R. Oraibi, A.M. Radhi, Enhancement digital forensic approach for inter-frame video forgery detection using a deep learning technique. Iraqi J. Sci. 63(6), 2686–2701 (2022). https://doi.org/10.24996/ijs.2022.63.6.34

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. M. Munawar, I. Noreen, Duplicate frame video forgery detection using siamese-based RNN. Intell. Autom. Soft Comput. 29(3), 927–937 (2021)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. P. Priyanka, O. K. Rajesh and M. Baburaj, Matrix Decomposition based Digital Video Forgery Detection. In: 2022 IEEE 4th international conference on cybernetics, cognition and machine learning applications (ICCCMLA), Goa, India, 92022), pp 403–406, doi: https://doi.org/10.1109/ICCCMLA56841.2022.9989283

  21. https://drive.google.com/open?id=1CE6X010dyQiMBpAlgoU18yWQxD1ckeU

  22. http://cong2ktu.edu.tr/

Download references

Funding

The authors declare that no funds, grants, or other support were received during the preparation of this manuscript.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Kharat Jayashree Prashant.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors have no relevant financial or non-financial interests to disclose.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Prashant, K.J., Krishnrao, K.P. Frame Shuffling Forgery Detection Method for MPEG-Coded Video. J. Inst. Eng. India Ser. B 105, 635–645 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40031-024-00995-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40031-024-00995-3

Keywords

Navigation