Abstract
In India, transport infrastructure varies greatly from one state to another, region to region, and city to city. This study aims at identifying the key-performance-indicators for sustainable transportation infrastructure and evaluation of the same through multi-criteria-decision-making tools like factor analysis and structural-equation-modelling (SEM). Research has been conducted through a variety of parameters pertaining to sustainable dimensions in terms of usage as service providers and users. This required extensive examination of internal as well as external components, including those impacting traffic flow, current road conditions, the air quality index, urbanisation patterns, level-of-service evaluations of the road infrastructure, traveller profiles, and their complex interrelationships. Research work was undertaken to analyse sustainable aspects and understand the causal relationships formed by SEM modelling based on sustainable dimension factors with sustainable transportation infrastructure. This study will be staging a strong cause-and-effect link between the performance metrics regarding the creation and redesign of sustainable transportation infrastructure. The key findings of this research will be providing a holistic understanding of the intricate web of sustainable practices and their interdependencies which will help to inform a more subtle and comprehensive approach to the assessment and establishment of transportation infrastructure that complies with today's sustainability requirements.
Similar content being viewed by others
Availability of Data and Material
All data pertaining to this research will be made available on demand.
Code Availability
All the software codes used in this research will be made available on demand.
References
The 2018 Revision of the World Urbanization Prospects, Population Division of the United Nations Department of Economic and Social Affairs (UN DESA, 2018)
C.T. Boyko, M.R. Gaterell, R.G. Austin, J.B. Barber, J.R. Bryson, D. Butler, Benchmarking sustainability in cities: the role of indicators and future scenarios. Glob. Environ. Change 22, 245–254 (2012)
D.A. Patel, K.N. Jha, Structural equation modelling for relationship-based determinants of safety performance in construction projects. J. Manag. Eng.Manag. Eng. 32(6), 05016017 (2016)
J. Rueda-Benavides, K. Mohamed, M. Miller, G. Douglas, Cross-asset prioritisation model for transportation projects using multi-attribute utility theory: a case study. Int. J. Constr. Manag.Manag. (2022). https://doi.org/10.1080/15623599.2022.2092811
D.W.M. Chan, O. Timothy, O.B.S. Abdullahi, D. Ekundayo, Comparative analysis of the barriers to smart sustainable practices adoption in the construction industry between Hong Kong and Nigeria. Int. J. Constr. Manag.Manag. (2022). https://doi.org/10.1080/15623599.2022.2108973
D. Chamil, E. Ramanayaka, O.A. Olatunji, J.O. Rotimi, Critical success factors of strategy-led planning of high-profile projects. Int. J. Constr. Manag.Manag. 23(1), 75–88 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1080/15623599.2020.1849973
C.R. Arukala, R. Pancharathi, P. Raj, Evaluation of sustainable performance indicators for the built environment using AHP approach. J. Inst. Eng. India Ser. A 100, 1–13 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40030-019-00405-8
R. Bhatt, J.E.M. Macwan, D. Bhatt, Sustainable building assessment tool: Indian leading architects’ perceptions and preferences. J. Inst. Eng. India Ser. A 93, 259–270 (2012)
D. Sarkar, M. Singh, Development of risk index for mass rapid transit system project in Western India through application of fuzzy analytical hierarchy process. Int. J. Constr. Manag.Manag. 21(5), 439–451 (2021)
M. Singh, D. Sarkar, D. Vara, Comparative study of risk indices for infrastructure transportation project using different methods. J. Inst. Eng. India Ser. A 100(2), 275–286 (2019)
D. Sarkar, M. Singh, Risk analysis by integrated fuzzy expected value method and fuzzy failure mode and effect analysis for an elevated metro rail project of Ahmedabad, India. Int. J. Constr. Manag.Manag. (2020). https://doi.org/10.1080/15623599.2020,2020
N. Ranganath, D. Sarkar, P. Patel, S. Patel, Application of fuzzy TOPSIS method for risk evaluation in development and implementation of solar park in India. Int. J. Constr. Manag.Manag. (2020). https://doi.org/10.1080/15623599.2020.1826027
H. Doloi, K.C. Iyer, A. Sawhney, Structural equation model for assessing impacts of contractor’s performance on project success. Int. J. Proj. Manag.Proj. Manag. 29(6), 687–695 (2011)
H. Bapat, D. Sarkar, R. Gujar, Evaluation of key performance indicators of integrated project delivery and BIM model for infrastructure transportation project in Ahmedabad, India through decision-making approach. J. Inst. Eng. India Ser. A 102, 995–1011 (2021)
H. Bapat, D. Sarkar, R. Gujar, Application of multi-criteria decision making for evaluation of key performance indicators of integrated project delivery and BIM model for an infrastructure transportation project in Western India. Int. J. Constr. Manag.Manag. (2022). https://doi.org/10.1080/15623599.2022.2040077
R.A. Ojelabi, O.O. Oyeyipo, A.O. Afolabi, I.O. Omuh, Evaluating barriers inhibiting investors participation in public–private partnership project bidding process using structural equation model. Int. J. Constr. Manag.Manag. 22(16), 3055–3064 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1080/15623599.2020.1840010
C.M. Jeon, A. Adjo, A. Amekudzi, R. Guensler, Sustainability assessment at the transportation planning level: performance measures and indexes. Transp. Policy 25, 10–21 (2013)
A. Sarkar, S. Sarkar, Comparative assessment between statistical and soft computing methods for accident severity classification. J. Inst. Eng. India Ser. A 101, 27–40 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40030-019-00422-7
A.S. Santos, S.K. Ribeiro, The use of sustainability indicators in urban passenger transport during the decision-making process: the case of Rio de Janeiro, Brazil. Curr. Opin. Environ. Sustain.. Opin. Environ. Sustain. 5, 251–260 (2013)
E. McDermot, D. Agdas, R. Carlos, R. Díaz, T. Rose, E. Forcael, Improving performance of infrastructure projects in developing countries: an Ecuadorian case study. Int. J. Constr. Manag.Manag. 22(13), 2469–2483 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1080/15623599.2020.1797985,2022
M. Tavassolirizi, H. Sarvari, D.W.M. Chan, O.O. Timothy, Factors affecting delays in rail transportation projects using analytic network process: the case of Iran. Int. J. Constr. Manag.Manag. 22(14), 2712–2723 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1080/15623599.2020.1819946
K.K. Tripathi, K.N. Jha, Determining success factors for a construction organization: a structural equation modeling approach. J. Manag. Eng.Manag. Eng. 34(1), 04017050 (2018)
S. Kumar, D. Toshniwal, A data mining approach to characterize road accident locations. J. Mod. Transp. 24(1), 62–72 (2016)
S. Kar, K.N. Jha, Examining the effect of material management issues on the schedule and cost performance of construction projects based on a structural equation model: survey of Indian experiences. J. Constr. Eng. Manag. ASCE (2020). https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0001906
S.K. Viswanathan, K.K. Tripathi, K.N. Jha, Influence of risk mitigation measures on international construction project success criteria—a survey of Indian experiences. Constr. Manag. Econ.Manag. Econ. 38(3), 207 (2020)
G.D. Zhou, A. Yang, Structural equation modelling for pedestrians’ perception in integrated transport hubs. Procedia Eng. 137(817–826), 2016 (2016)
S.Z.S. Tabish, K.N. Jha, Success traits for a construction project. J. Constr. Eng. Manag.Manag. 138(10), 1131–1138 (2012)
D. Sarkar, H.B. Raghavendra, M. Ruparelia, Role of key performance indicators for evaluating the usage of BIM as a tool for facility management of construction projects. Int. J. Civ. Struct. Eng.Struct. Eng. 5(4), 370–378 (2015)
D. Sarkar, M. Singh, Risk analysis by integrated fuzzy expected value method and fuzzy failure mode and effect analysis for an elevated metro rail project of Ahmedabad, India. Int. J. Constr. Manag.Manag. 22(10), 1818–1829 (2022)
K.K. Tripathi, K.N. Jha, An empirical study on factors leading to the success of construction organizations in India. Int. J. Constr. Manag.Manag. 19(3), 222 (2019)
S. Belay, J. Goedert, A. Woldesenbet, S. Rokooei, J. Matos, H. Sousa, Key BIM adoption drivers to improve performance of infrastructure projects in the Ethiopian construction sector: a structural equation modeling approach. Adv. Civ. Eng. (2021). https://doi.org/10.1155/2021/7473176
S. Elizar, M.A. Wibowo, Model of construction waste management using AMOS-SEM for Indonesian infrastructure projects. MATEC Web Conf. 138, 05005 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1051/matecconf/2017138050
Acknowledgements
The authors highly acknowledge the co-operation of Ahmedabad metro rail authorities for providing us the necessary data for carrying out this research work.
Funding
No funding from any agency was received for this research.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
No potential conflict of interest has been reported by all the authors.
Informed Consent
Necessary information and consent have been obtained from all the authors.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Bhattacharya, K., Sarkar, D. & Chaturvedi, S. Application of Factor Analysis and Structure Equation Modelling for Evaluation of Key Performance Indicators for Development of Sustainable Transportation Infrastructure. J. Inst. Eng. India Ser. A 104, 791–806 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40030-023-00761-6
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40030-023-00761-6