Skip to main content
Log in

Montana Flume Aeration Performance Evaluation with Machine Learning Models

  • ORIGINAL CONTRIBUTION
  • Published:
Journal of The Institution of Engineers (India): Series A Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Montana flume is derived from Parshall flume by eliminating diverging part and throat. The mass transfer of oxygen from the atmosphere into the water is known as aeration. The dissolved oxygen (D.O.) concentration in the water body determines water quality. The experiment was performed on six different Montana flumes fixed in a tilting prismatic rectangular channel. Experimental observations were used to develop classical and machine learning models to predict Montana flume aeration efficiency. The developed models are namely multi nonlinear regression (MNLR), adaptive neuro-fuzzy inference system (ANFIS), and artificial neural network (ANN). The models were tested, and the results show that all these three developed models perform very well. However, ANN gives better results than other models as it has the highest cc and lowest rmse values. According to the sensitivity analysis results, the Reynolds number (Re) was the most crucial input element in determining the aeration efficiency of the Montana flume in the case of dimensionless datasets. However, discharge per unit width (q) is found to be of relative significance in the case of dimensional datasets.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. W.K. Lewis, W.G. Whitman, Principles of gas absorption. Ind. Eng. Chem. 16(12), 1215–1220 (1924)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Parshall, Ralph Leroy. Measuring water in irrigation channels. No. 1683. U.S. Department of Agriculture, 1941.

  3. R.G. Zytner, Z.G. Rahmé, M. Labocha, Oxygen uptake at parshall flumes. Can. J. Civ. Eng. 25(4), 769–776 (1998)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. N.K. Tiwari, P. Sihag, Prediction of oxygen transfer at modified parshall flumes using regression models. ISH J. Hydraul. Eng. 26(2), 209–220 (2020)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Sangeeta, et al. Machine learning model development for predicting aeration efficiency through parshall flume. Eng. Appl. Comput. Fluid Mech. 15(1): 889–901 (2021).

  6. S.R. Sangeeta, N.K. Tiwari, Aeration efficiency evaluation of modified small parshall flume using M5P and adaptive neuro-fuzzy. Sustain. Eng. Proc. EGRWSE 30, 243–252 (2019)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. O.F. Dursun, An experimental investigation of the aeration performance of parshall flume and venturi flumes. KSCE J. Civ. Eng. 20(2), 943–950 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. N.K. Tiwari, Evaluating hydraulic jump oxygen aeration by experimental observations and data driven techniques. ISH J. Hydraul. Eng. 27(sup1), 601–615 (2021)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. A. Baylar, M.E. Emin, T. Bagatur, An experimental investigation of aeration performance in stepped spillways. Water Environ. J. 20(1), 35–42 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. J.S. Gulliver, J.R. Thene, A.J. Rindels, Indexing gas transfer in self-aerated flows. J. Environ. Eng. 116(3), 503–523 (1990)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Luxmi, K. M., Tiwari, N. K., Ranjan S. Application of soft computing approaches to predict gabion weir oxygen aeration efficiency. ISH J. Hydraul. Eng.: 1–15 (2022)

  12. M. Kumar, N.K. Tiwari, S. Ranjan, Experimental study on oxygen mass transfer characteristics by plunging hollow jets. Arab. J. Sci. Eng. 46(5), 4521–4532 (2021)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. A. Apha, W.E.F., 2005. Stand. Methods Exam. Water Wastewater 21, 258–259 (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  14. P.R. Wormleaton, C.C. Tsang, Aeration performance of rectangular planform labyrinth weirs. J. Environ. Eng. 126(5), 456–465 (2000)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Bostan, Tuba, et al. “The effect of hydraulic jump on the aeration efficiency.” (2013).

  16. M. Markofsky, H. Kobus, Unified presentation of weir-aeration data. J. Hydraul. Div. 104(4), 562–568 (1978)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

The author declares that no funds, grants, or other support were received during the preparation of this manuscript.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

All authors contributed to the study conception and design. Material preparation, data collection and analysis were performed by AT, NKT, CSPO and SR. The first draft of the manuscript was written by AT and all authors commented on previous versions of the manuscript. All authors approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ashwini Tiwari.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors have no relevant financial or non-financial interests to disclose.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Tiwari, A., Ojha, C.S.P., Tiwari, N.K. et al. Montana Flume Aeration Performance Evaluation with Machine Learning Models. J. Inst. Eng. India Ser. A 104, 175–186 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40030-022-00706-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40030-022-00706-5

Keywords

Navigation