Skip to main content
Log in

Seismic Performance Evaluation of Reinforced Concrete Frames Subjected to Seismic Loads

  • Brief Communication
  • Published:
Journal of The Institution of Engineers (India): Series A Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Ten storied-3 bays reinforced concrete bare frame designed for gravity loads following the guidelines of IS 456 and IS 13920 for ductility is subjected to seismic loads. The seismic demands on this building were calculated by following IS 1893 for response spectra of 5% damping (for hard soil type). Plastic hinges were assigned to the beam and column at both ends to represent the failure mode, when member yields. Non-linear static (pushover) analysis was performed to evaluate the performance of the building in reference to first (ATC 40), second (FEMA 356) and next-generation (FEMA 440) performance based seismic design procedures. Base shear against top displacement curve of structure, known as pushover curve was obtained for two actions of plastic hinge behavior, force-controlled (brittle) and deformation-controlled (ductile) actions. Lateral deformation corresponding to performance point proves the building capability to sustain a certain level of seismic loads. The failure is represented by a sequence of formation of plastic hinges. Deformation-controlled action of hinges showed that building behaves like strong-column-weak-beam mechanism, whereas force-controlled action showed formation of hinges in the column. The study aims to understand the first, second and next generation performance based design procedure in prediction of actual building responses and their conservatism into the acceptance criteria.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Abbreviations

ATC:

Applied Technical Council

FEMA:

Federal Emergency Management Agency

SEAOC:

Structural Engineer Association of California

\(V_{p}\) :

Base shear at performance point

\(V_{b}\) :

Base shear obtained from IS 1893

\(d_{p}\) :

Displacement corresponding to performance point

References

  1. B.-Q. Liu, M. Liu, Y.-B Li, Research and development of performance—based seismic design theory, in 13th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering, August 1–6 Canada. Paper no. 2457 (2004)

  2. Y.C. Sung, C.K. Su, C.W. Wu, I.C. Tsai, Performance based damage assessment of low rise reinforced concrete buildings. J. Chin. Inst. Eng. 29(1), 51–62 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. A. Ghobarah, Performance-based design in earthquake engineering: state of development. Eng. Struct. 23, 878–884 (2001)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. A.R.K. Boroujeni, Evaluation of various methods of FEMA 356 compare to FEMA 440. J. Civ. Eng. Constr. Tech. 4(2), 51–55 (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  5. ATC-40, Seismic evaluation and retrofit of concrete building (Applied Technology Council, Redwood city, 1996)

    Google Scholar 

  6. FEMA-273, NHERP guidelines for seismic rehabilitation of buildings (Federal Emergency Management Agency, Washington, 1997)

    Google Scholar 

  7. FEMA-356, Pre-standard and Commentary for seismic Rehabilitation of Buildings (Federal Emergency Agency, Washington, 2000), p. 2000

    Google Scholar 

  8. FEMA-440, Improvement in nonlinear static seismic analysis procedures (Federal emergency management agency, Washington, 2005)

    Google Scholar 

  9. R. Hasan, L. Xu, D.E. Grierson, Push-over analysis for performance-based seismic design. Comput. Struct. 80, 2483–2493 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. M. Modirzadeh, T. Solomon, S.M. Abbas, Performance based earthquake evaluation of reinforced concrete buildings using design of experiments. Expert Syst. Appl. 39(3), 2919–2926 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. A. Whittaker, R. hamburger and M. Mahoney, Performance—based engineering of buildings for extreme events, in AISC-SINY symposium on resisting blast and progressive collapse, pp. 55–66 (2003)

  12. R. Goel, C. Charles, Evaluation of ACSE-41 nonlinear static procedure using recorded motion of reinforced concrete buildings, in Proceeding of Structure Congress (2008)

  13. BIS IS 456, Indian Standard Plain and Reinforced Concrete-Code of Practice (Bureau of Indian standards, New Delhi, 2000)

    Google Scholar 

  14. BIS IS 1893, Indian standard Criteria for earthquake resistant design of structure (Part 1) (Bureau of Indian standards, New Delhi, 2002)

    Google Scholar 

  15. BIS IS 1786, Indian Standard for high strength deformed steel bars and wires for concrete reinforcement (Bureau of Indian Standards, New Delhi, 2008)

    Google Scholar 

  16. E.L. Wilson, A. Habibullah, SAP 2000/NL-Push software, Vesrsion 14 (Computers and Structures Inc, Berkeley, 2010)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors acknowledge the research contribution of all citations under reference and support from VJTI, Mumbai, India and MGM’s College of Engineering, Nanded, Maharashtra, India.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mohd. Zameeruddin.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Zameeruddin, M., Sangle, K.K. Seismic Performance Evaluation of Reinforced Concrete Frames Subjected to Seismic Loads. J. Inst. Eng. India Ser. A 98, 177–183 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40030-017-0196-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40030-017-0196-0

Keywords

Navigation