Skip to main content
Log in

The online culture of agriculture: exploring social media readiness of agricultural professionals

  • Original Research
  • Published:
CSI Transactions on ICT Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Agriculture is of high importance in India because of the dependence of 140 million farmers on the sector, its implications for a climate smart future, as a supplier of raw materials for industries, and for feeding the large population. Information becomes an important input in the sector to make it sustainable and social media is an important tool. Acceptance and use of social media is skewed across the sector because of multiple factors that ultimately decide its applicability. This study explored social media usage among agricultural extension professionals and their perceived benefits for agricultural development. The study draws data collected through online Google forms distributed through email and social media platforms (Facebook, Twitter, WhatsApp) from 269 extension professionals globally and 264 from India and discusses what affects use of social media in professional communication. WhatsApp, Facebook and YouTube were the most preferred platforms because of easier user interface and higher percentage of users, and personal mobile phones were the most preferred mode of access. Organizations were found to be catching up in use of social media but still lagged behind in concrete policies to guide the use of digital tools. The findings strongly advocate increased use of social media in agricultural extension and advisory services.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. Difference in level of education of the average population between the economies.

  2. The increasing phenomena of forwarding messages on social media as received, without fact checking of any kind, snowballs the chances of spreading information that lacks authenticity, and may provide wrong information in cases, thus causing negative impacts.

References

  1. McNab C (2009) What social media offers to health professionals and citizens. Bull World Health Organ 2009(87):566–566. https://doi.org/10.2471/BLT.09.066712

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Brown K (2017) 9 Ways social media is transforming developing countries. http://dobusinessjamaica.com/blog/9-ways-social-media-is-transforming-developing-countries/. Accessed 22 May 2018

  3. Kemp S (2018) Digital in 2018: World’s internet users pass the 4 billion mark. https://wearesocial.com/blog/2018/01/global-digital-report-2018. Accessed 22 May 2018

  4. Smith R (2018) A million WhatsApp messages were sent in the time it’s taken you to read this headline, World Economic Forum. https://www.weforum.org/agenda/2018/03/internet-minute-whatsapp-facebook-emails/. Accessed 9 April 2018

  5. Mitchell A, Simmons K, Matsa KE, Silver L (2018) People in poorer countries just as likely to use social media for news as those in wealthier countries. http://www.pewglobal.org/2018/01/11/people-in-poorer-countries-just-as-likely-to-use-social-media-for-news-as-those-in-wealthier-countries/. Accessed 22 May 2018

  6. Global NGO Technology Report (2018) http://www.nptechforgood.com/2018/02/11/2018_global_ngo_technology_report/. Accessed 22 May 2018

  7. Global Diffusion of eHealth: Making Universal Health Coverage Achievable (2016) Report of the third global survey on eHealth. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2016. Licence: CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO. http://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/handle/10665/252529/9789241511780-eng.pdf;jsessionid=8BC7D48D5A1AF7B1491BC2E9CD8BC3D0?sequence=1. Accessed 20 May 2018

  8. Jurgenson N (2012) When atoms meet bits: social media, the mobile web and augmented revolution. Future Internet 4:83–91

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Schivinski B, Christodoulides G, Dabrowski D (2016) Measuring consumers’ engagement with brand-related social-media content—development and validation of a scale that identifies levels of social-media engagement with brands. J Advert Res 56(1):1–18. https://doi.org/10.2501/JAR-2016-000

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Schivinski B, Dabrowski D (2014) The effect of social media communication on consumer perceptions of brands. J Mark Commun (ahead of print). https://doi.org/10.1080/13527266.2013.871323

  11. Bruhn M, Schoenmueller V, Schäfer DB (2012) Are social media replacing traditional media in terms of brand equity creation? Manag Res Rev 35(9):770–790

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Laroche M, Habibi MR, Richard MO, Sankaranarayanan R (2012) The effects of social media based brand communities on brand community markers, value creation practices, brand trust and brand loyalty. Comput Hum Behav 28(5):1755–1767

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Schau HJ, Muniz JRAM, Arnould EJ (2009) How brand community practices create value. J Mark 73:30–51

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Algesheimer R, Dholakia UM, Herrmann A (2005) The social influence of brand community: evidence from European car clubs. J Mark 69(July):19–34

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Suchiradipta B, Saravanan R (2016) Social media: shaping the future of agricultural extension and advisory services, GFRAS interest group on ICT4RAS discussion paper. GFRAS, Lindau

    Google Scholar 

  16. Nelson GC, Rosegrant MW, Koo J, Robertson R, Sulser T, Zhu T, Ringler C, Msangi S, Palazzo A, Batka M, Magalhaes M, Valmonte-Santos R, Ewing M, Lee D (2009) Climate change: impact on agriculture and cost of adaptation. Food Policy Report, IFPRI, Washington DC

    Google Scholar 

  17. Rosenberg T (2014) A Green revolution, this time for Africa, The New York Times. http://opinionator.blogs.nytimes.com/2014/04/09/a-green-revolution-this-time-for-africa/?_r=0. Accessed 10 May 2018

  18. FAO (2015) A body of evidence: what climate change implies for global food security and trade, http://www.fao.org/news/story/en/item/293954/icode/. Accessed 10 May 2018

  19. Woods K, Langcuster JC (2014) The use of digital technology in extension. J Ext. Article5COM3, http://www.joe.org/joe/2014october/comm3.php

  20. Carr CT, Hayes RA (2015) Social media: defining developing and divining. Atl J Commun. https://doi.org/10.1080/15456870.2015.972282

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Varner J (2012) Agriculture and social media. Mississippi State University Extension Service, Mississippi

    Google Scholar 

  22. Arnold S, Hill A, Bailey N, Meyers C, (2012) Extension’s online presence: are land grant universities promoting the tripartite mission? J Ext. Article number 6RIB1

  23. Saravanan R, Suchiradipta B (2014) Social media: New generation tools for agricultural extension? http://www.aesa-gfras.net/Resources/file/Saravanan%20Final%20blog%2042.pdf

  24. Kinsley J (2010) Five social media tools for the extension toolbox. J Ex. Article number 5TOT7

  25. Gharis LW, Bardon RE, Evans JL, Hubbard WG, Taylor E (2014) Expanding the reach of extension through social media. J Ext 52(3):1–11

    Google Scholar 

  26. Newman N, Fletcher R, Kalogeropoulos A, Levy DAL, Nielsen RK (2017) Digital News Report 2017, Reuters Institute for the Study of Journalism. https://reutersinstitute.politics.ox.ac.uk/sites/default/files/Digital%20News%20Report%202017%20web_0.pdf. Accessed 20 May 2018

  27. Chowdhury A, Hambly Odame H (2013) Social media for enhancing innovation in agri-food and rural development: current dynamics in Ontario, Canada. J Rural Community Dev 8(2):97–119

    Google Scholar 

  28. Daily time spent on social networking by internet users worldwide from 2012 to 2017 (in minutes). https://www.statista.com/statistics/433871/daily-social-media-usage-worldwide/. Accessed 20 May 2018

  29. Langer E (2014) What’s trending? Social media and its effect on organizational communication. J Undergrad Res. http://www.uwlax.edu/urc/JUR-online/PDF/2014/Langer.Emily.CST.pdf. Accessed 22 May 2018

  30. Pedrick C (2015) Embracing Web 2.0 and Social Media: a life changing pathway for agricultural development actors. CTA, Netherlands. https://publications.cta.int/en/publications/publication/1816/. Accessed 22 May 2018

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Saravanan Raj.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Suchiradipta, B., Raj, S. The online culture of agriculture: exploring social media readiness of agricultural professionals. CSIT 6, 289–299 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40012-018-0205-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40012-018-0205-0

Keywords

Navigation