Skip to main content
Log in

Unraveling the Roles of Solitary and Social Web-Making Spiders in Perennial Ecosystems: Influence on Pests and Beneficials

  • Research Article
  • Published:
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, India Section B: Biological Sciences Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The results show that the orb-weaver spiders, Neoscona theisi and Cyrtophora citricola, occurred in both guava and citrus agroecosystems, and their prey primarily comprised a wide diversity of insect pests. In contrast, the sheet web-constructing social spider, Stegodyphus sarasinorum, occurred only in the citrus agroecosystem and preyed mainly on the beneficial insects, particularly the pollinators, including the Asian honeybee, Apis cerana, along with the predaceous ladybird beetle, Coccinella septempunctata, damselfly, Agriocnemis femina, and the ant, Camponotus compressus. Field observations revealed that the beneficial insects caught and captured by the social spiders comprised mainly the flower-visiting insects of ornamental and weed plants growing in the vicinity of the fruit trees. N. theisi preyed predominantly on pests of paddy (Nephotettix nigropictus, Oxya nitidula), wheat (Rhopalosiphum padi), citrus (Papilio demoleus) and guava (Bactrocera dorsalis) and to a lesser extent on damselflies, houseflies, and ants. C. citricola with smaller orb webs preyed upon N. nigropictus, R. padi, M. domestica, C. septempunctata, and C. compressus. Except the guava pest, B. dorsalis, the pests of paddy and wheat from the infested crops cultivated in the nearby ~ 500-m distant located farm were attracted by the streetlights and were preyed upon by the arboreal spiders. The results highlight the significant role of orb web spiders in the suppression of insect pests of crops and also provide direct evidence of the negative role of social spiders as predators of the Asian honeybee, A. cerana, and other beneficial insects.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+
from $39.99 /Month
  • Starting from 10 chapters or articles per month
  • Access and download chapters and articles from more than 300k books and 2,500 journals
  • Cancel anytime
View plans

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Symondson WOC (2002) Molecular identification of prey in predator diets. Mol Ecol 83:137–147

    Google Scholar 

  2. Cotes B, González M, Benítez E, De Mas E, Clemente-Orta G, Campos M, Rodríguez E (2018) Spider communities and biological control in native habitats surrounding greenhouses. Insects 9:1–12

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Sunderland KD (1999) Mechanisms underlying the effects of spiders on pest populations. J Arachnol 27:308–316

    Google Scholar 

  4. Rypstra AL, Tirey RS (1991) Prey size, prey perishability and group foraging in a social spider. Oecologia 86:25–30

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Nyffeler M, Birkhofer K (2017) An estimated 400–800 million tons of prey are annually killed by the global spider community. Sci Nat 104:30

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Finke DL, Denno RF (2002) Intraguild predation diminished in complex-structured vegetation: implications for prey suppression. Ecology 83:643–652

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Maloney D, Drummond FA, Randy A (2003) Spider predation in agroecosystems: can spiders effectively control pest populations? MAFES Tech Bull 340:190

    Google Scholar 

  8. Venner S, Thevenard L, Pasquet A, Leborgne R (2001) Estimation of the web’s capture thread length in orb-weaving spiders: determining the most efficient formula. Ann Entomol Soc Am 94:490–496

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Blackledge TA, Eliason CM (2007) Functionally independent components of prey capture are architecturally constrained in spider orb webs. Biol Lett 3:456–458

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Seibt U, Wickler W (1990) The protective function of the compact silk nest of social Stegodyphus spiders (Araneae, Eresidae). Oecologia 82:317e321

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Wright CM, Keiser CN, Pruitt JN (2016) Colony personality composition alters colony-level plasticity and magnitude of defensive behaviour in a social spider. Anim Behav 115:175–183

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Willey MB, Jackson RR (1993) Predatory behavior of a social spider, Stegodyphus sarasinorum (Araneae, Eresidae): why attack first? Can J Zool 71:2220–2223

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Walter A, Bechsgaard J, Scavenius C, Dyrlund TS, Sanggaard KW, Enghild JJ, Bilde T (2017) Characterisation of protein families in spider digestive fluids and their role in extra-oral digestion. BMC Genom 18:600

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Kulkarni SS, Deshpande VY (2011) Ecology and behavioral changes in spider Argiope anasuja (female). Adv Appl Sci Res 2:380–383

    Google Scholar 

  15. Lone MA, Dar IY, Bhat GA (2015) A study on ecological distribution and community diversity of spiders in Gulmarg Wildlife Sanctuary of Kashmir Himalaya. J Ecol Nat Environ 7:81–86

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Khan SR, Singh SK, Rastogi N (2017) Heavy metal accumulation and ecosystem engineering by two common mine site-nesting ant species: implications for pollution-level assessment and bioremediation of coal mine soil. Environ Monit Assess 189:195. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-017-5865-y

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Sharma PD (1998) Ecology and environment. Rastogi Publication, Meerut

    Google Scholar 

  18. Ndakidemi B, Mtei K, Ndakidemi PA (2016) The potential of common beneficial insects and strategies for maintaining them in bean fields of Sub Saharan Africa. Am J Plant Sci 7:425–436

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Sharma A, Singh R (2018) Biodiversity and guild structure of spiders in northeastern Uttar Pradesh. Res J Life Sci Bioinform Pharm Chem Sci 4:525–541

    Google Scholar 

  20. Vijaya P, Mareeswari K, Uma Rani S (2018) Biodiversity of spiders aranea in V. V. V College Campus in Virudhunagar District, Tamil Nadu, South India. Int J Entomol Res 3:104–106

    Google Scholar 

  21. Rao D, Aceves-Aparicio A (2012) Notes on the ecology and behavior of a subsocial spider Anelosimus baeza (Araneae: Theridiidae) in Mexico. J Arachnol 40:325–331

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Jelaska LS, Franjevic D, Jelaska SD, Symondson WOC (2014) Prey detection in carabid beetles (Coleoptera: Carabidae) in woodland ecosystems by PCR analysis of gut contents. Eur J Entomol 111:631–638

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Lang A, Filser J, Henschel JR (1999) Predation by ground beetles and wolf spiders on herbivorous insects in a maize crop. Agric Ecosyst Environ 72:189–199

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Kaspari M, Weiser M (2000) Ant activity along a moisture gradients in a neotropical forest. Biotropica 32:703–711

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Wyckhuys KAG, O’Neil RJ (2007) Influence of extra-field characteristics to abundance of key natural enemies of Spodoptera frugiperda Smith (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) in subsistence maize production. Int J Pest Manag 53:89–99

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Sunderland K, Samu K (2000) Effects of agricultural diversification on the abundance, distribution, and pest control potential of spiders: a review. Entomol Exp Appl 95:1–13

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Theisen-Jones H, Bienefeld K (2016) The Asian honey bee (Apis cerana) is significantly in decline. Bee World 93:90–97

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Oldroyd BP, Nanork P (2009) Conservation of Asian honey bees. Apidologie 40:296–312

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Nyffeler M, Breene RG (1991) Impact of prédation upon honey bees (Hymenoptera, Apidae), by orb-weaving spiders (Araneae, Araneidae and Tetragnathidae) in grassland ecosystems. J Appl Entomol 111:179–189

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Dukas R, Morse DH (2003) Crab spiders affect flower visitation by bees. Oikos 101:157–163

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Vanegas M (2017) The silent beehive: how the decline of honey bee populations shifted the environmental protection agency’s pesticide policy towards pollinators. Ecology 44:311–341

    Google Scholar 

  32. Gómez-Moracho T, Heeb P, Lihoreau M (2017) Effects of parasites and pathogens on bee cognition. Ecol Entomol 42:51–64

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors wish to thank Prof. A.J. Solomon Raju, Department of Environmental Sciences, Andhra University, Visakhapatnam, and Dr. D.C. Dhali, ZSI, Kolkata, for their help in the identification of arthropod species. They are also thankful to Prof. S.P. Singh, Genetics and Plant Breeding Department, Institute of Agricultural Sciences, for kindly permitting the field studies in the Horticulture Farm of Banaras Hindu University. Funding support (Grant No. R/Dev/S(UGC-Research Fellow)/2014-15/87858) from University Grants Commission, New Delhi, is gratefully acknowledged.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Neelkamal Rastogi.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that there is no conflict of interest to publish this manuscript.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Significance Statement

The results highlight the negative influence of a social spider, Stegodyphus sarasinorum, on insect pollinators and the biological control potential of two species of solitary orb-weaver spiders, Neoscona theisi and Cyrtophora citricola, on crop pests.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Mishra, A., Rastogi, N. Unraveling the Roles of Solitary and Social Web-Making Spiders in Perennial Ecosystems: Influence on Pests and Beneficials. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci., India, Sect. B Biol. Sci. 90, 567–576 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40011-019-01126-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40011-019-01126-5

Keywords