Skip to main content

Present Status of the Sustainable Fishing Limits for Hilsa Shad in the northern Bay of Bengal, India

Abstract

The hilsa, Tenualosa ilisha fishery in the northern Bay of Bengal (nBoB) is passing through a crisis manifested by the persistent decline of fish catch in spite of increasing efforts. During the period 2002–2015, the number of boats engaged in the fishery increased by 25% while the hilsa catch decreased by 13%. The exponential value (b) and condition factor (K) of hilsa has also decreased by 46% and 28% respectively. The value of fishing mortality (F = 2.34 year−1) has considerably exceeded the natural mortality (M = 0.56 year−1) during the study period. It is observed that in place of maximum exploitation rate (Emax) of 0.78, the current exploitation rate (E) of hilsa is 0.81 which is above the sustainable limit. It is a matter of serious concern that with 75% probability the first spawners of the population are being targeted by the present fishing practice. The present study observes that the hilsa population of nBoB are being significantly overexploited in the present level of fishing pressure. The maximum sustainable yield (MSY) limit for hilsa is estimated to be around 25,440 tons per year with the corresponding effort (fMSY) that may be deployed to achieve the above mentioned catch ranged from 3571 to 3987 (number of boats). It can be inferred that the hilsa fishery in the nBoB is being unsustainably exploited.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8

References

  1. 1.

    DoF (2008) Fisheries statistical year book of Bangladesh, 2006–07. Department of Fisheries, MoFL, Dhaka

    Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    CMFRI (2016) Annual report 2015–16. Central Marine Fisheries Research Institute, Kochi

    Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    DoF (2016) Handbook of fisheries statistics 2015–2016. West Bengal Fisheries Department, Government of West Bengal, Dhaka

    Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    Bladon AJ, Katherine MS, Essam YM, Milner-Gulland EJ (2016) Payments for ecosystem services in developing world fisheries. Fish Fish 17:839–859

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    Amin SMN, Rahaman MA, Haldar GC, Mazid GC, Milton D (2002) Population dynamics and stock assessment of hilsa shad, Tenualosa ilisha in Bangladesh. Asian Fish Sci 15:123–128

    Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    Dutta S, Maity S, Chanda A, Akhand A, Hazra S (2012) Length weight relationship of four commercially important marine fishes of Northern Bay of Bengal, West Bengal, India. J Appl Env Biol Sci 2:52–58

    Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    Dutta S, Maity S, Chanda A, Hazra S (2012) Population structure, mortality rate and exploitation rate of hilsa shad (Tenualosa ilisha) in West Bengal coast of northern Bay of Bengal, India. World J Fish Mar Sci 4:54–59

    Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    Miah MS, Rahman MA, Halder GC, Mazid MA (1998) Estimation of maximum sustainable yield (MSY) of hilsa (Tenualosa ilisha, Ham.) in the Meghna river of Bangladesh. Bangladesh J Fish Res 2:177–182

    Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    Chaloupka M, Balazs G (2007) Using Bayesian state-space modelling to assess the recovery and harvest potential of the Hawaiian green sea turtle stock. Ecol Model 205:93–109

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    Schaefer MB (1954) Some aspects of the dynamics of populations important to the management of commercial marine fisheries. Inter-Am Trop Tuna Comm 1:25–56

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    Fox WW Jr (1970) An exponential surplus-yield model for optimizing exploited fish populations. Trans Am Fish Soc 99:80–88

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    Santos MN, Gaspar MB, Vasconcelos PV, Monteiro CC (2002) Weight-length relationship for 50 selected fish species of the Algarve coast (southern Portugal). Fish Res 59:289–295

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. 13.

    Beverton RJH, Holt SJ (1996) On the dynamics of exploited fish populations. Chapman and Hall, London

    Google Scholar 

  14. 14.

    Anderson RO, Neumann RM (1996) Length, weight and associated structural indices. In: Murphy BR, Willis DW (eds) Fisheries techniques, 2nd edn. American Fisheries Society, Bethesda, pp 447–482

    Google Scholar 

  15. 15.

    Chow S, Sandifer PA (1991) Differences in growth, morphometric traits and male sexual maturity among Pacific white shrimp, Penaeus vannamei, from different commercial hatcheries. Aquaculture 92:165–179

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. 16.

    Ahsan DA, Naser MN, Bhaumik U, Hazra S, Bhattacharya SB (2014) Migration, spawning patterns and conservation of hilsa shad (Tenualosa ilisha) in Bangladesh and India. IUCN, New Delhi

    Google Scholar 

  17. 17.

    Gayanilo FC Jr, Sparre P, Pauly D (1996) FAO-ICLARM stock assessment tools (FiSAT) user’s guide. FAO Computerised information series (fisheries). Rome, FAO 266

  18. 18.

    Pauly D (1980) On the inter-relationships between natural mortality, growth performance and mean environmental temperature in 175 fish stock. J du Conseil 39:175–192

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. 19.

    Das S, Chanda A, Giri S, Akhand A, Hazra S (2015) Characterizing the influence of tide on the physico-chemical parameters and nutrient variability in the coastal surface water of the northern Bay of Bengal during the winter season. Acta Oceano Sin 34:102–111

    Google Scholar 

  20. 20.

    Mohamed ARM, Qasim AM (2014) Stock assessment and management of hilsa shad (Tenualosa ilisha) in Iraqi marine waters, northwest Arabian Gulf. World J Fish Mar Sci 6:201–208

    Google Scholar 

  21. 21.

    Darimont CT, Carlson SM, Kinnison MT, Paquet PC, Reimchen TE, Wilmers CC (2009) Human predators outpace other agents of trait change in the wild. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 106:952–954

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. 22.

    Trippel EA (1995) Age at maturity as a stress indicator in fisheries. Bioscience 45:759–771

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. 23.

    Hutchings JA (2004) Evolutionary biology: the cod that got away. Nature 428:899–900

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. 24.

    Hsieh CH, Reiss CS, Hunter JR, Beddington JR, May RM, Sugihara G (2006) Fishing elevates variability in the abundance of exploited species. Nature 443(7113):859–862

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. 25.

    Bhaumik U, Naskar M, Sharma AP (2011) Size distribution, length–weight relationship and sex ratio of the Hilsa (Tenualosa ilisha) in the Hooghly estuarine system. J Inland Fish Soc India 43(2):1–5

    Google Scholar 

  26. 26.

    Patterson K (1992) Fisheries for small pelagic species: an empirical approach to management targets. Rev Fish Biol Fisher 2:321–338

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. 27.

    Reuben S, Dan SS, Somarmu MV, Philipose V, Sathianandan TV (1992) The resources of hilsa shad, Hilsa ilisha (Hamilton), along the Northeast coast of India. Indian J Fish 39:169–181

    Google Scholar 

  28. 28.

    ICES (1988) Reports of the ICES advisory committee on fishery management, 1987. ICES Coop Res Rep 153:415

    Google Scholar 

  29. 29.

    Mace PM (2001) A new role for MSY in single species and ecosystem approaches to fisheries stock assessment and management. Fish Fish 2:2–31

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors express their heartfelt gratitude to the Indian National Centre for Ocean Information Services (INCOIS) (INCOIS: F&A: XII: A1:031) for providing funding support to conduct the study during 2009–2017. Department of Fisheries, Govt. of West Bengal and fishermen unions of Fraserganj Fishing harbour, Diamond Harbour and Digha are gratefully acknowledged for their support.

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Isha Das.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Significance statement Hilsa shad have an important contribution in the economy and socio-cultural milieu of West Bengal. The decreasing catch trend of hilsa in recent past raised concerns about the nature of fishing pressure acting upon the fish stock. The present study enquires about the sustainability of hilsa fishery in the nBoB.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Das, I., Hazra, S., Das, S. et al. Present Status of the Sustainable Fishing Limits for Hilsa Shad in the northern Bay of Bengal, India. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci., India, Sect. B Biol. Sci. 89, 525–532 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40011-018-0963-3

Download citation

Keywords

  • Hilsa
  • Maximum sustainable yield (MSY)
  • Sustainable fishery
  • Schaefer–Fox model