Cytogenotoxicological Effects of the Methanolic Extract of Dysophylla auricularia
- 12 Downloads
Dysophylla auricularia (L.) Blume. is a medicinal plant of the family Lamiaceae used in the tribal traditional medicinal practice in Bangladesh. The scientific basis of the toxicological effects of the plants is yet to be evaluated. This study evaluated the toxic, cytotoxic and mutagenic non-clinical effects of the methanol extract of D. auricularia (MDA). The cytotoxic effect of MDA was observed on eggs of Artemia salina for 24-h treatment, while the toxic and mutagenic effects in Allium cepa for 48-h treatment. Potassium dichromate (K2Cr2O7) and copper sulfate (CuSO4·5H2O) were used as standard A. salina and A. cepa test systems, respectively. For A. salina test, the MDA and K2Cr2O7 were tested at 6.25–100 µg ml−1, while for A. cepa test MDA and CuSO4·5H2O at 100–500 µg ml−1 and 0.6 µg ml−1, respectively. Results showed that MDA increased mortality in A. salina in a concentration-dependent manner with highest mortality (50 ± 0.71%) at 100 µg ml−1. In A. cepa test also, MDA caused concentration-dependent decrease in percentage of mitotic index with an increased number of non-dividing cells. Moreover, MDA also inhibited the growth of the meristematic region of A. cepa and caused an increase in chromosomal aberrations such as breaks, bridges, stickiness, as well as micronuclei formation in a concentration-dependent manner. In conclusion, D. auricularia exhibited toxicological responses in A. salina and A. cepa test systems that advocates that adequate precautions should be taken during its traditional usages.
KeywordsAllium cepa Artemia salina Cytotoxicity Mutagenicity Toxicity Health concern
The authors are grateful to the Department of Pharmacy, Southern University Bangladesh (SUB) and Nuclear of Pharmaceutical Technology (NTF), Federal University of Piauí (UFPI), Brazil, for laboratory facilities to conduct this study.
Compliance with ethical standards
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that there is no conflict of interest to publish this manuscript.
- 1.Latha LS, Reddy PN (2009) Antimicrobial, antidiarrheal and analysis of phytochemical constituents of Sphaeranthus amaranthoides. Indian J Sci Technol 2:45–48Google Scholar
- 12.Diana F, Fernandéz V, Torres E (2000) Evaluacion de la actividad genotóxica de efluentes de curtiembres del Dpto. Central de la region oriental. Paraguay Rev Ciencia Tecnol 2:37–48Google Scholar
- 14.Asante-Duah K (2002) Public health risk assessment for human exposure to chemicals (illustrated), vol 6. Kluwer Academic Publishers, DordrechtGoogle Scholar
- 18.Clayton GD, Clayton FE (1981) Patty’s industrial hygiene and toxicology, 3rd edn, vol 2, Part 6 Toxicol. Wiley, NYGoogle Scholar
- 19.Rana NU, Hasan I, Karim N, Sakib MH, Rashid MHO, Dhar R (2015) Phytochemical, cytotoxic and thrombolytic activity of methanolic extract of Dysophylla auricularia leaves. Am J Pharmtech Res 5:466–476Google Scholar
- 23.Rajabi S, Ramazani A, Hamidi M, Naji T (2015) Artemia salina as a model organism in toxicity assessment of nanoparticles. J Pharmaceut Sci 23:20Google Scholar
- 30.Islam MT, Streck L, Paz MFCJ, Sousa JMC, Alencar MVOB, Mata AMOF, Carvalho RM, Santos JVO, Silva-Junior AA, Ferreira PMP, Melo-Cavalcante AAC (2016) Preparation of phytol-loaded nanoemulsion and screening for antioxidant capacity. Int Arch Med 9:1–15Google Scholar
- 31.Islam MT (2016) Concentration-dependent-activities of diterpenes: achieving anti-/pro-oxidant links. Asian J Ethnopharmacol Med Foods 2:12–15Google Scholar