A Novel Autogamous Self-Pollination Strategy Involving Closing of Perianth Lobes in Talinum fruticosum (L.) Juss.


Pollination is a prerequisite for fertilization and subsequent fruit and seed development. Nearly 90% of the flowering plants use a range of animals for pollination services. Depending on the sexuality and the breeding system of the species, the type of pollen that the flower receives ranges from complete outcrossing to complete selfing. Preliminary observations on Talinum fruticosum (L.) Juss. (Portulacaceae) did not reveal any floral visitors but showed abundant fruit and seed set. Detailed studies carried out to analyze the mode of development of fruits and seeds in the absence of pollinators revealed a novel method of autogamy in this species. Diurnal flowers remain open just for 5–6 h, and they do not get pollinated during this period due to lack of floral visitors. The five free perianth lobes start closing up and gradually curl around the stamens and the pistil, thus bringing the dehisced anthers in contact with the stigma in almost all the flowers inducing > 90% fruit set. This is another example of the evolution of autogamy under pollinator constraint as a means of reproductive assurance.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2


  1. 1.

    Ollerton J, Winfree R, Tarrant S (2011) How many flowering plants are pollinated by animals? Oikos 120:321–326

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    Richards AJ (1986) Plant breeding systems. Allen and Unwin, London

    Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    Wilcock C, Neiland R (2002) Pollination failure in plants: why it happens and when it matters. Trends Plant Sci 7:270–277

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    Knight TM et al (2005) Pollen limitation of plant reproduction: pattern and process. Ann Rev Ecol Evol Syst 36:467–497

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    Eckert CG, Samis KE, Dart S (2006) Reproductive assurance and the evolution of uniparental reproduction in flowering plants. In: Harder LD, Barrett SCH (eds) Ecology and evolution of flower. Oxford University Press, New York, pp 183–203

    Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    Pellmyr O (2002) Pollination by animals. In: Herrera CM, Pellmyr O (eds) Plant–Animal interactions: an evolutionary approach. Wiley-Blackwell Publishers, Malden, pp 157–184

    Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    Aschan G, Pfanz H (2003) Non-foliar photosynthesis – a strategy of additional carbon acquisition. Flora 198:81–97

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    Burd M (1994) Bateman's principle and plant reproduction: the role of pollen limitation in fruit and seed set. Bot Rev 60:83–139

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    Biesmeijer JC et al (2006) Parallel declines in pollinators and insect-pollinated plants in Britain and the Netherlands. Science 313:351–354

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    Burkle LA et al (2013) Plant-pollinator interactions over 120 years: loss of species, co-occurrence, and function. Science 339:1611–1615

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    Levy S (2011) The pollinator crisis: what's best for bees. Nature 479:164–165

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    Potts SG et al (2016) Safeguarding pollinators and their values to human well-being. Nature 540:220–229

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  13. 13.

    Baker HG (1974) The evolution of weeds. Ann Rev Ecol Syst 5:1–24

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. 14.

    Kalisz S, Vogler DW (2003) Benefits of autonomous selfing under unpredictable pollinator environments. Ecology 84:2928–2942

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. 15.

    Eckert CG et al (2010) Plant mating systems in a changing world. Trends Ecol Evol 25:35–43

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. 16.

    Levin DA (1996) The evolutionary significance of pseudo-self-fertility. Am Nat 148:321–332

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. 17.

    Shivanna KR (2014) Reproductive assurance through autogamy in some annual weed species. Proc Natl Acad Sci India Sect B 84:681–687

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. 18.

    Shivanna KR (2015) Reproductive assurance through autogamous self-pollination across diverse sexual and breeding systems. Curr Sci 109:1255–1263

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. 19.

    Rech AR et al (2018) Pollinator availability, mating system and variation in flower morphology in a tropical savanna tree. Acta Bot Bras 32:462–472

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. 20.

    Catling PM (1990) Auto-pollination in the Orchidaceae. In: Arditti J (ed) Orchid biology: reviews and perspectives. Timber Press, Portland, pp 121–158

    Google Scholar 

  21. 21.

    Chaturvedi SK (1988) Abiotic pollination in Tylophora hirsuta Wight (Asclepiadaceae). Asklepios 45:58–62

    Google Scholar 

  22. 22.

    Chaturvedi SK (1989) A new device of self pollination in Boerhaavia diffusa L. (Nyctaginaceae). Beit Biol Pflanz 64:55–58

    Google Scholar 

  23. 23.

    Chaturvedi SK (2008) Mechanism of self pollination in Cymbidium sinense (Jacks. ex. Ander.) Willd. (Orchidaceae). Int J Plant Reprod Biol 1:1–4

    Google Scholar 

  24. 24.

    Peter CJ, Johnson SD (2009) Autonomous self-pollination and pseudo-fruit set in South African species of Eulophia (Orchidaceae). S Afr J Bot 75:791–797

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. 25.

    Chaturvedi SK, Chaturvedi S (2011) A unique mode of autogamy in Flickingeria calocephala Tsi & Chen (Orchidaceae). Int J Plant Reprod Biol 3:1–3

    Google Scholar 

  26. 26.

    Chaturvedi SK (2012) Unique mode of mechanical autogamy in Phalaenopsis taenialis (Lindl.) E.A. Christensen & Pradhan (Orchidaceae). Int J Plant Reprod Biol 4:1–4

    Google Scholar 

  27. 27.

    Gigant RL et al (2016) Microsatellite markers confirm self-pollination and autogamy in wild populations of Vanilla mexicana (Mill.) (syn V. inodora) (Orchidaceae) in the island of Guadeloupe. Intechopen. https://doi.org/10.5772/64674

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. 28.

    Lekhak MM et al (2011) Corolla elongation as an aid in self-pollination in Rhamphicarpa longiflora (Scrophulariaceae). Curr Sci 100:162–1624

    Google Scholar 

Download references


The author thanks Dr. M. Sanjappa for identifying the species and Prof. Rajesh Tandon for help in statistical analyses of the data.

Author information



Corresponding author

Correspondence to K. R. Shivanna.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The author has no conflict of interest to publish this manuscript.

Additional information

Significance statement

Pollination is one of the most critical requirements for fruit and seed development. The present report is the first and novel report on closing of perianth lobes around the stamens and stigma in effecting autogamous self-pollination.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Shivanna, K.R. A Novel Autogamous Self-Pollination Strategy Involving Closing of Perianth Lobes in Talinum fruticosum (L.) Juss.. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci., India, Sect. B Biol. Sci. 89, 1407–1411 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40011-018-01066-6

Download citation


  • Perianth-mediated autogamy
  • Pollination
  • Reproductive assurance
  • Talinum fruticosum