Pharmacognostic Evaluation and Pharmacological Validation of Sphaeranthus indicus DC

Abstract

Sphaeranthus indicus is an important medicinal plant in Ayurveda which grows as weed in rice fields throughout India, Sri Lanka, Australia and Africa. The present study aimed for the pharmacognostical evaluation and pharmacological validation of this high-value medicinal species. All the pharmacognostical parameters were done as per the API guideline. A simple, rapid, sensitive and reproducible method was also developed for simultaneous HPTLC quantification of two bioactive compounds eugenol and β-sitosterol in S. indicus. The HPTLC was performed on silica gel 60 F254 by using toluene/ethyl acetate/glacial acetic acid (8:2:0.2) as a mobile phase for eugenol and β-sitosterol at Rf value 0.64 and 0.48, respectively. The content of eugenol (0.03%) and β-sitosterol (0.013%) was detected in dry weight per gram. In vitro activities viz. antioxidant, antidiabetic and anti-inflammatory were done to evaluate the pharmacological potential of S. indicus. Four antioxidant models viz. DPPH, ferric reducing power, 2-deoxyribose assay and antioxidant capacity were used to determine the free radical scanning. Antidiabetic and anti-inflammatory potential were determined by using starch–iodine colour assay and inhibition of protein denaturation model. IC50 value of S. indicus extract in DPPH and 2-deoxyribose assay was found (328.96 ± 0.003 µg/ml) and (30.36 ± 0.004 µg/ml), respectively. The present study will be helpful for quality check of the raw material and monitoring batch-to-batch consistency of herbal drugs, wherein S. indicus is used as an ingredient.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7

References

  1. 1.

    Chopra RN, Nayar SL, Chopra IC (1996) Glossary of Indian medicinal plants, 1st edn. National Institute of Science Communication, New Delhi, p 232

    Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    Ambavade S, Mhetre N, Tate V, Bodhankar S (2006) Pharmacological evaluation of the extracts of Spharenthus indicus flowers on anxiolytic activity in mice. Ind J Pharm 38(4):254–259

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    Rohit R, Mahendra S, Richa S, Kavitha M, Vikram SS (2014) A Clinical Study on the effect of Punarnavadi churna, Singhanada guggulu in the management of Amavata (Rheumatoid Arthritis). Int J Ayurveda Pharm Res 2:46–54

    Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    Galani VJ, Patel BG, Rana DG (2009) Sphaeranthus indicus Linn: a phytopharmacological review. Int J Ayurveda Res 1(4):247–253

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    Nadkarni AK (2007) Indian materia medica, vol 1, 3rd edn. Popular Parkashan Private Ltd, Bombay, p 1163

    Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    Prajapati N, Purohit SS, Sharma AK, Kumare TA (2003) Handbook of medicinal plants: a complete source book, 1st edn. Agrobios, Jodhpur, p 484

    Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    Agarwal VS (1997) Drug plants of India, vol 2. Kalyani Publishers, New Delhi, p 656

    Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    Galani VJ, Patel BG, Rana DG (2010) Sphaeranthus indicus Linn.: a phytopharmacological review. Int J Ayurveda Res 1:247–253

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    Makhija K, Richard L, Kirti SP, Saleemullah K, Jessy M, Shirwaikar A (2011) Sphaeranthus indicus: a review of its chemical, pharmacological and ethnomedical properties. Ind J Pharm 7:171–179

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    Jadhav BK, Khandelwal KR, Ketkar AR, Pisal SS (2004) Formulation and evaluation of mucoadhesive tablets containing eugenol for the treatment of periodontal diseases. Drug Dev Ind Pharm 30(2):195–203

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    Chellappandian M, Thanigaivel A, Srinivasan PA et al (2018) Toxicological effects of Sphaeranthus indicus Linn. (Asteraceae) leaf essential oil against human disease vectors, Culex quinquefasciatus Say and Aedes aegypti Linn., and impacts on a beneficial mosquito predator. Environ Sci Pollut Res 25:10294–10306

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    Singh S, Semwal BC, Neeli GS (2017) Microscopic and physicochemical evaluation of leaves of Sphaeranthus indicus Linn. Pharmacogn J 9(1):21–26

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. 13.

    Bhutkar PM, Suganthi V, Bhutkar MV (2018) Medicinal uses of Sphaeranthus indicus: a review. Nat J Basic Med Sci 8(3):160–166

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. 14.

    Venkatachalam D, Thavamani S, Muddukrishniah (2018) Pharmacognostic and phytochemical evaluation of leaf of Sphaeranthus indicus. Int J Pharm Pharm Res 11(3):186–206

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. 15.

    Anonymous (2002) WHO guidelines, Quality control methods for medicinal plant materials. A.I.T.B.S. Publishers and Distributors, New Delhi, pp 6–84

    Google Scholar 

  16. 16.

    Anonymous (2004) Ayurvedic pharmacopoeia of India, vol 1. Government of India, Department of Health, Ministry of Health and Family Welfare, New Delhi, pp 152–165

  17. 17.

    Anonymous (1984) Official methods of Analysis of Association of official Analytical Chemists (AOAC), Virginia, US

  18. 18.

    Bray HC, Thorpe WV (1954) Analysis of phenolic compounds of interest in metabolism. Methods Biochem Anal 1:27–52

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. 19.

    Ordonez AA, Gomez JD, Vattuone MA, Isla MI (2006) Antioxidant activities of Sechium edule (Jacq.) swart extracts. Food Chem 97(3):452–458. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodchem.2005.05.024

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  20. 20.

    Kokate CK (2010) Practical pharmacognosy, 4th edn. Vallabh Prakashan, New Delhi, pp 17–26

    Google Scholar 

  21. 21.

    Farhin Inam, Sujata Deo, Neha Narkhede (2014) Quantification of eugenol in various spices using high performance thin layer chromatogrphy. Int J Sci Eng Res 5(5):1576

    Google Scholar 

  22. 22.

    Sutar RC, Kasture SB, Kalaichelvan VK (2014) Identification, quantification and validation of β-sitosterol from Holoptelea integrifolia (roxb.) planch using high performance thin layer chromatography method. Ind J Pharm Pharm Sci 6(5):249–252

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. 23.

    ICH guideline Q2R1 (2005) Validation of analytical procedures: text and methodology, Geneva, Switzerland

  24. 24.

    Shukla PK, Misra A, Srivastav S, Rawat AKS (2016) Reversed phase high performance liquid chromatographic ultra violet (photo diode array) quantification of oleanolic acid and its isomer ursolic acid for phytochemical comparison and pharmacological evaluation of four leucas species used in Ayurveda. Pharmacogn Mag 12(46):159

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  25. 25.

    Prabhu KS, Lobo R, Shirwaikar A (2012) Free radical scavenging activity of aqueous extract of Spharanthus indicus (Linn.). Pharmacology 2:468–476

    Google Scholar 

  26. 26.

    Oyaizu M (1986) Studies on products of browning reaction: antioxidative activities of products of browning reaction prepared from glucosamine. Jpn J Nutr 44:307–315

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  27. 27.

    Prieto P, Pineda M, Aguilar M (1999) Spectrophotometric quantitation of antioxidant capacity through the formation of a phosphomolybdenum complex: specific application to the determination of vitamin E. Anal Biochem 269:337–341

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  28. 28.

    Xiao Z, Storms R, Tsang A (2006) A quantitative starch–iodine method for measuring alpha-amylase and glucoamylase activities. Anal Biochem 351:146–148

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  29. 29.

    Mizushima Y, Kobayashi M (1968) Interaction of anti-inflammatory drugs with serum preoteins, especially with some biologically active proteins. J Pharm Pharmacol Res 20:169–173

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  30. 30.

    Sakat S, Juvekar AR, Gambhire MN (2010) In vitro antioxidant and anti-inflammatory activity of methanol extract of Oxalis corniculata Linn. Ind J Phar Pharmacol Sci 2(1):146–155

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors are thankful to the Director, CSIR-NBRI, India, for providing the facilities to conduct this research work.

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sharad Srivastava.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors do not have any conflict of interest to publish this manuscript.

Additional information

Significance statement

The present study establishes pharmacognostical and phytochemical standards of Sphaeranthus indicus for quality assurance of the bioactive contents which can be utilized for the health benefits.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Tiwari, S., Shukla, P.K., Srivastava, A. et al. Pharmacognostic Evaluation and Pharmacological Validation of Sphaeranthus indicus DC. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci., India, Sect. B Biol. Sci. 89, 1429–1438 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40011-018-01063-9

Download citation

Keywords

  • Sphaeranthus indicus
  • Eugenol
  • β-sitosterol
  • HPTLC
  • Antioxidant
  • Antidiabetic