DNA Barcodes Distinguish Withania somnifera and Withania ashwagandha
- 70 Downloads
On the basis of morphology, chemical profiling, crossing ability, amplified fragment length polymorphism and comparison of nucleotide sequences of nuclear ribosomal internal transcribed spacer (ITS), the cultivated form of Withania somnifera, a species of therapeutic value, has been circumscribed as a new species, Withania ashwagandha. The present study was undertaken to ascertain whether the two species can be distinguished on the basis of DNA barcoding. Six barcode loci, ITS, ITS2, matK (maturase K), rbcL (ribulose-bisphosphate carboxylase/oxygenase, large subunit), rpoC1 (RNA polymerase-β′ subunit, main catalytic subunit) and trnH-psbA spacer (transfer RNA for histidine-photosystem II protein D1 spacer) from W. somnifera, W. ashwagandha, their hybrid, and ‘ashwagandha’ market samples were amplified, sequenced, and compared. ITS, ITS2 and matK distinguished two species on the basis of phylogenetic tree method. Likewise, BLAST 1 analysis based on ITS, ITS2, matK, and rbcL individually discriminated two species. However, on the basis of Kimura 2 Parameter distances, two species could not be distinguished as the requirement of a distinct barcode gap—the highest intraspecific distance being lower than the lowest interspecific distance—was not met by any of the loci. If compared by character-based method, ITS, ITS2 and matK sequences of the two species had distinct diagnostic nucleotides (pure character attributes) at nine, four and one positions, respectively. Interestingly, all market samples co-segregated and shared character attributes with W. ashwagandha.
KeywordsDNA barcoding Withania ITS matK rbcL
The authors thank Dr. Sushma Koul formerly from the Biodiversity and Applied Botany Division, Institute of Integrative Medicine, Jammu for providing the plant material. They gratefully acknowledge the financial support provided by the Indian Council of Medical Research, New Delhi to S.B.B. in form of a research project. S.M. too thankfully acknowledges the receipt of Junior and Senior Research fellowships from this project. The present work was also partially supported by a Research and Development grant provided to S.B.B. by the University of Delhi. The language editing of the manuscript by Dr. Anupam Raina, a professional copy editor, is gratefully acknowledged.
Compliance with Ethical Standards
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
- 1.The Plant List (2013) Version 1.1. Published on the Internet. http://www.theplantlist.org/. Accessed 27 Apr 2015
- 8.Sehgal N, Gupta A, Valli RK, Joshi SD, Mills JT, Hamel E, Khanna P, Jain SC, Thakur S, Ravindranath V (2012) Withania somnifera reverses Alzheimer’s disease pathology by enhancing low-density lipoprotein receptor-related protein in liver. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 109:3510–3515CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- 10.Mir BA, Koul S, Kumar A (2010) Intraspecific variation in the internal transcribed spacer (ITS) regions of rDNA in Withania somnifera (Linn.) Dunal. Indian J Biotechnol 9:325–328Google Scholar
- 11.Kumar A, Mir BA, Sehgal D, Dar TH, Koul S, Kaul MK, Raina SN, Quazi GN (2011) Utility of a multidisciplinary approach for genome diagnostics of cultivated and wild germplasm resources of medicinal Withania somnifera, and the status of new species, W. ashwagandha, in the cultivated taxon. Plant Syst Evol 291:141–151CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 12.Kaul KN (1957) The origin, distribution and cultivation of ‘Ashwagandha’ the so called Withania somnifera of Indian literature. In: Proceedings of symposium utilization of Indian medicinal plants. National Botanic Gardens, CSIR, Lucknow, pp 7–8Google Scholar
- 13.Sastry MS, Dhalla NS, Malhotra CL (1960) Chemical examination of Withania ashwagandha Kaul. Indian J Pharmacol 22:205–208Google Scholar
- 14.Dhalla NS, Gupta KC, Sastry NS, Malhotra CL (1961) Comparative studies on Withania somnifera Dunal and Withania ashwagandha Kaul. Indian J Pharmaco 23:126–127Google Scholar
- 16.Negi MS, Sabharwal V, Wilson N, Lakshmikumaran MS (2006) Comparative analysis of the efficiency of SAMPL and AFLP in assessing genetic relationships among Withania somnifera genotypes. Curr Sci 91:464–471Google Scholar
- 24.China Plant BOL Group, Li DZ, Gao LM, Li HT, Wang H, Ge XJ, Liu JQ, Chen ZD, Zhou SL, Chen SL, Yang JB, Fu CX, Zeng CX, Yan HF, Zhu YJ, Sun YS, Chen SY, Zhao L, Wang K, Yang T, Duan GW (2011) Comparative analysis of a large dataset indicates that internal transcribed spacer (ITS) should be incorporated into the core barcode for seed plants. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 108:19641–19646CrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- 27.Doyle JJ, Doyle JL (1987) A rapid DNA isolation procedure for small quantities of fresh leaf tissue. Phytochem Bullet 19:11–15Google Scholar
- 31.White TJ, Bruns T, Lee S, Taylor JW (1990) Amplification and direct sequencing of fungal ribosomal RNA genes for phylogenetics. In: Innis MA, Gelfand DH, Sninsky JJ, White TJ (eds) PCR protocols: a guide to methods and applications. Academic Press, New York, pp 315–322Google Scholar
- 32.Tate JA, Simpson BB (2003) Paraphyly of Tarasa (Malvaceae) and diverse origins of the polyploid species. Syst Bot 28:723–737Google Scholar
- 34.Hall TA (1999) BioEdit: a user-friendly biological sequence alignment editor and analysis program for Windows 95/98/NT. Nucleic Acids Symp Ser 41:95–98Google Scholar
- 39.Atal CK, Schwarting AE (1962) Intraspecific variability in Withania somnifera. I. A preliminary survey. Llyodia 25:78–87Google Scholar
- 41.Meyer CP, Paulay G (2005) DNA barcoding: error rates based on comprehensive sampling. PLoS Biol 3:2229–2238Google Scholar