Skip to main content
Log in

Comparative Study of Conventional and Improved Retting of Jute with Microbial Formulation

  • Research Article
  • Published:
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, India Section B: Biological Sciences Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A comparative study between conventional and improved retting of jute (Corchorus olitorius L. and C. capsularis L.) with a talc based microbial formulation was carried out for three consecutive retting trials in the same water during 2014. Due to introduction of the microbial formulation consisting of three different strains of Bacillus pumilus in the improved method, retting duration reduced by 6–7 days, fibre recovery increased by 9.7–12%, with the improvement in fibre quality (colour, lustre, fibre strength etc.) as compared to conventional method. The net return of farmers also increased by Rs. 13,490 ha−1 over conventional retting. Moreover, the root content which is not desirable for quality fibre production was high (16–20%) in conventionally retted fibre as compared to fibre obtained from improved retting (3–4%). The polygalacturonase (3.6–5.3 IU ml−1), pectin lyase (142–185 IU ml−1) and xylanase activities (5.2–7.5 IU ml−1) recorded in retting water after each retting of improved method was higher by more than 2 times as compared to conventional one. These higher enzymatic activities in the retting water resulted in reduced retting duration and improvement in fibre recovery and quality. Further, the quality jute fibre extraction from repeated retting in the same stagnant water was possible by using the highly efficient microbial formulation. This technology has the potential to meet the demand of quality jute fibre by jute industries and also to increase the net income of resource poor jute farmers with meagre initial input.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Sinha MK, Ramasubramanian T, Palit P (2010) Jute and allied fibres research: present and future. In: Palit P, Sinha M, Meshram JH, Mitra S, Laha SK, Saha AR, Mahapatra BS (eds) Jute and allied fibres, production, utilization and marketing. Indian Fibre Society, Eastern Region, ICAR-Central Research Institute for Jute and Allied Fibres, Barrackpore, Kolkata, pp 27–34

  2. Satpathy S, Selvaraj K, Gotyal BS, Biswas C, Gawande SP, Sarkar SK, De RK, Tripathi AN, Ramesh Babu V, Mandal K, Meena P (2014) Problems and prospects of pest management in jute and allied fibre crops. In: Invited lecture and book of abstracts of international conference on natural fibres (theme: jute & allied fibres) held at Kolkata from 1–3 Aug, pp 30–36

  3. Dasgupta PC, Sardar D, Majumdar AK (1976) Chemical retting of jute. Food Farming Agric 8:7–9

    Google Scholar 

  4. Majumdar AK, Day A (1977) Chemical constituents of jute ribbon and the materials removed by retting. Food Farming Agric 21:25–26

    Google Scholar 

  5. Haque MS, Ahmed Z, Asaduzzaman M, Quashem MA, Akhter F (2002) Distribution and activity of microbial population for jute retting and their impact on water of jute growing areas of Bangladesh. Pakistan J Biol Sci 5(6):704–706

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Majumdar B, Das S, Saha AR, Chowdhury H, Maitra DN, Saha MN (2013) Improved retting of jute and mesta with microbial formulation. Bull. No. 4/2013, Central Research Institute for Jute and Allied Fibres (ICAR), Kolkata, p 31

    Google Scholar 

  7. Das S, Majumdar B, Saha AR (2015) Biodegradation of plant pectin and hemicelluloses with three novel Bacillus pumilus strains and their combined application for quality jute fibre production. Agric Res 4(4):354–364. doi:10.1007/s40003-015-0188-0

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Majumdar B, Das S, Bhadra A, Saha AR, Chowdhury H, Kundu DK (2011) Development of talc based formulation of microbial consortium for retting. JAF News 9(1):20

    Google Scholar 

  9. Majumdar B, Das S, Saha MN (2008) Monitoring of microbial status of retting water and soil of some jute growing areas of South Bengal. In: Proceedings of the international symposium on jute and allied fibres production, utilization and marketing. Kolkata, organized by Indian Fibre Society (Eastern Region), p 66

  10. Roy G, Bhattacharya GK, Sengupta S, Mukherjee M (2009) A new electronic fibre bundle strength tester for jute. J Inst Eng (India) 89:10–13

    Google Scholar 

  11. Bandyopadhyay SB, Sinha NG (1968) An airflow method for the determination of the fibre fineness of jute and mesta. J Text Inst 59:148–151

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Roy G, Saha SC (2013) An automatic integrated jute grading instrument. In: Proceedings published by international journal of computer applications (IJCA), pp 13–15

  13. Phutela U, Dhuna V, Sandhu S, Chadha BS (2005) Pectinase and polygalacturonase production by a thermophilic Aspergillus fumigatus isolated from decomposting orange peels. Braz J Microbiol 36:63–69

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Nedjma M, Hoffmann N, Belarbi A (2001) Selective and sensitive detection of pectin lyase activity using a colorimetric test: application to the screening of microorganisms possessing pectin lyase activity. Anal Biochem 291:290–296

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Monisha R, Uma MV, Krishna Murthy V (2009) Partial purification and characterization of Bacillus pumilus xylanase from soil source. Kathmandu Univ J Sci Eng Technol 5(2):137–148

    Google Scholar 

  16. Ahmed Z, Akhter F (2001) Jute retting: an overview. Online J Biol Sci 1(7):685–688

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Majumdar B, Sarkar S, Biswas D, Saha AR, Jha SK (2014) Impact of field demonstrations of improved microbial jute retting technology using CRIJAF SONA. JAF News 12(2):24–25

    Google Scholar 

  18. Mukherjee MK, Halder G, Ghosh S, Dua DB (1960) Retting of jute: X. Influence of covering material on the colour of foibre and the retting period under Assam conditions. Proc Ind Sci Cong III:541

    Google Scholar 

  19. Das B, Chakrabarti K, Ghosh S, Majumdar B, Tripathi S, Chakraborty A (2012) Effect of efficient pectinolytic bacterial isolates on retting and fibre quality of jute. Ind Crops Prod 36:415–419. doi:10.1016/j.indcrop.2011.10.003

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Banik S, Basak MK, Sil SC (2007) Effect of inoculation of pectinolytic mixed bacterial culture on improvement of ribbon retting of jute and kenaf. J Nat Fibers 4:33–50

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Majumdar B, Das S, Bhadra A, Saha AR, Sarkar S, Kundu DK (2012) Large scale demonstration of improved retting technology. JAF News 10(2):11

    Google Scholar 

  22. Majumdar B, Bandopadhyay P, Singh MV, Zaman ASN, Laxman K, Jena Sarika, Jagannadham J, Roy A, Subramanian A, Mazumdar SP, Das PK, Pandey SK, Kumar M, Saha AR, Mitra S, Das S, Chattopadhyay L, Kundu A, (2015) CRIJAF SONA: a potential tool for improving fibre quality of jute & mesta. Bull. No. 1/2015. AINP JAF, ICAR-Central Research Institute for Jute and Allied Fibres (ICAR), Kolkata, p 18

  23. Majumdar B, Satpathy S (2014) Improved retting technology of jute for quality fibre production. Indian Farming 64(8):18–20

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors are grateful to the Director, ICAR-Central Research Institute for Jute & Allied Fibres for the necessary facilities provided for carrying out the work.

Funding

Indian Council of Agricultural Research.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to B. Majumdar.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Das, S., Majumdar, B., Saha, A.R. et al. Comparative Study of Conventional and Improved Retting of Jute with Microbial Formulation. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci., India, Sect. B Biol. Sci. 88, 1351–1357 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40011-017-0872-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40011-017-0872-x

Keywords

Navigation