Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Physiological Growth Indices of Maize Under Semi-Arid Irrigated Conditions as Influenced by Subsoil Compaction and Nitrogen Fertilization

  • Research Article
  • Published:
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, India Section B: Biological Sciences Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The study was initiated to access the effect of subsoil compaction and nitrogen fertilization on various growth indices of maize, at research farm, Department of Soil Science, Punjab Agricultural University, Ludhiana. The split plot design was employed with three levels of subsoil compaction (main plot), three levels of N fertilization (subplot) and three replications. The dry matter accumulation, leaf area (LA) and growth indices were significantly lower under higher level of subsoil compaction. The crop growth rate (CGR) was significantly higher under C0 treatment at 30 DAS, 60 DAS and at harvest than that in C1 and C2 treatment. Higher root mass density was observed in the surface soil under C2 treatment, while a reverse trend was recorded at 15–30 and 30–60 cm soil depth, where higher root mass density was observed under C0 treatment than that in C1 and C2 treatment. Application of higher dose of N resulted in higher dry matter, LA index and growth indices than that in lower N application. A positive exponential relationship was observed between grain yield-CGR and biomass yield-CGR. The total N uptake was lower under C2 subsoil compaction level, while higher N rates improved N uptake. The N fertilization resulted in favourable nutrient regime and thereby improved maize growth, development and yield formation under higher subsoil compaction levels. Further studies could be done to access the environmental and soil health risks associated with higher N application under compacted subsoil conditions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Flowers M, Lal R (1998) Axle load and tillage effect on soil physical properties and soybean grain yield on a mollic ochraqualf in Northwest Ohio. Soil Tillage Res 48:21–35

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Sur HS, Prihar SS, Jalota SK (1980) Effect of rice-wheat and maize-wheat rotation on water transmission and wheat root development in a sandy loam soil of Punjab, India. Soil Tillage Res 1:361–371

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Sur HS, Sidhu SS (1982) Effect of rice-wheat and corn-wheat rotation on physical properties and root growth of wheat in a sandy loam soil. Paper presented at the 12th international congress of soil science held on 8–16 February, New Delhi

  4. Chen G, Weil RR (2010) Penetration of cover crop roots through compacted soils. Plant Soil 331:31–43

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Glab T, Kopec S (2009) Effect of soil compaction on root system morphology and yields of meadow fescue (Festuca pratensis). Pol J Environ Study 18:219–225

    Google Scholar 

  6. Lipiec J, Medvedev VV, Birkas M, Dumitru E, Lyndina TE, Rousseva S, Fulajtar E (2003) Effect of soil compaction on root growth and crop yield in Central and Eastern Europe. Intern Agrophysics 17:61–69

    Google Scholar 

  7. Ladha JK, Pathak H, Krupnik J, Six JT, Van Kessel C (2005) Efficiency of fertilizer nitrogen in cereal production: retrospect and prospect. Adv Agron 87:86–156

    Google Scholar 

  8. Vance CP (2001) Symbiotic nitrogen fixation and phosphorus acquisition. Plant nutrition in a world of declining renewable resources. Plant Physiol 127:390–397

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. Habtegebrial K, Singh BR, Haile M (2007) Impact of tillage and nitrogen fertilization on yield, nitrogen use efficiency of tef Eragrostis, Trotter and soil properties. Soil Tillage Res 94:55–63

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Ogola JBO, Wheeler TR, Harris PM (2002) Effects of nitrogen and irrigation on water use of maize crops. Field Crop Res 78:105–117

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Marschner H (1995) Mineral nutrition of higher plants. Academic Press, London

    Google Scholar 

  12. Tilman D, Cassman KG, Matson PA, Naylor R, Polasky S (2002) Agricultural sustainability and intensive production practices. Nature 418:671–677

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Miller AJ, Cramer MD (2004) Root nitrogen acquisition and assimilation. Plant Soil 274:1–36

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Hanway JJ (1963) Growth stages of corn (Zea mays L.). Agron J 55:487–492

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Tafteh A, Sepaskhah AR (2012) Yield and nitrogen leaching in maize field under different nitrogen rates and partial root drying irrigation. Intern J Plant Prod 6:93–114

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Bangarwa AS, Kairan MS, Singh KP (1988) Effect of plant density, levels and proportion of nitrogen fertilizers on growth, yield and yield components. Indian J Agric Sci 58:854–856

    Google Scholar 

  17. Prasad TV, Khrishnamurthy K, Shivashankar K (1990) Canopy and growth differences in maize genotypes in relation to plant densities and nitrogen levels. Mysore J Agric Sci 24:437–444

    Google Scholar 

  18. Shah P, Khan A, Rehman H, Shah Z (2008) Plant density and nitrogen effect on growth dynamics, light interception and yield of maize. Arch Agron Soil Sci 54:401–411

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Anonymous (2012) Package of practices for crops of Punjab: Kharif 2012. Punjab Agricultural University, Ludhiana, pp 18–32

    Google Scholar 

  20. Hunt R (1990) Basic growth analysis: plant growth analysis for beginners. Unwin Hymin, London

    Book  Google Scholar 

  21. Nelson DW, Somers LE (1973) Determination of total nitrogen in plant material. Agron J 65:109–112

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Blake GR (1965) Bulk density. In: Black CA (ed) Methods of soil analysis. Part I. physical and mineralogical properties. SSSA Inc., Madison, pp 374–390

    Google Scholar 

  23. Gomez KA, Gomez AA (1984) Statistical procedures for agricultural research. John Wiley and Sons Inc, New York

    Google Scholar 

  24. Mamman E, Ohu JO (1998) The effect of tractor traffic on air permeability and millet production in a sandy loam soil in Nigeria. IFE J Technol 8:1–7

    Google Scholar 

  25. Uhart SA, Andrade FH (1995) Nitrogen deficiency in maize. I. Effects on crop growth, development, dry matter partitioning, and kernel set. Crop Sci 3I5:1376–1383

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Amanullah Marwat KB, Shah P (2009) Nitrogen levels and its time of application influence leaf area, height and biomass of maize planted at low and high density. Pak J Bot 41:761–768

    Google Scholar 

  27. Gee-Clough D, Salokhe VM, Javid M (1990) The effect of soil compaction on maize yield in heavy clay soil. In: Proceedings of the international agricultural engineering conference and exhibition. 3–6 December, Bangkok-Thailand, pp 389–395

  28. Rosolem CA, Takahashi M (1998) Soil compaction and soybean root growth. In: Box JE (ed) Root demographics and their efficiencies in sustainable agriculture, grasslands and forest ecosystems. Proceedings of the 5th symposium of the international society of root research, Clemson, South Carolina, USA, pp. 295–304

  29. Grzesiak MT (2009) Impact of soil compaction on root architecture, leaf water status, gas exchange and growth of maize and triticale seedlings. Plant Root 3:10–16

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Kage H, Ehler W (1996) Does transport of water to the roots limit water uptake of field crops. Zeit Pflanz Bodenkunde 159:583–590

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Ogawa A, Kawashima C, Yamauchi A (2005) Sugar accumulation along the seminar root axis as affected by osmotic stress in maize: a possible physiological basis for plastic lateral root development. Plant Prod Sci 8:173–180

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Valero JAJ, Maturano M, Ramírez AA, Martín-Benito JMT, Alvarez JFO (2005) Growth and nitrogen use efficiency of irrigated maize in a semiarid region as affected by nitrogen fertilization. Spanish J Agric Res 3:134–144

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Adelana BO, Milbourn GM (1976) Relationship between leaf area and crop growth rate in maize. Ghana J Agric Sci 9:175–178

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors thank the Department of Soil Science, Punjab Agricultural University, Ludhiana for providing field and lab facilities to conduct this experiment. They also appreciate LA Kuldeep Singh and ASI Harjinder Singh for their assistance with sample collection, laboratory analysis and crop management. They thank the anonymous reviewers for their valuable and critical comments and suggestions for the improvement of the manuscript.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jagdish Singh.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Singh, J., Hadda, M.S. Physiological Growth Indices of Maize Under Semi-Arid Irrigated Conditions as Influenced by Subsoil Compaction and Nitrogen Fertilization. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci., India, Sect. B Biol. Sci. 86, 847–855 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40011-015-0533-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40011-015-0533-x

Keywords

Navigation