Skip to main content
Log in

Urease Activity and Its Kinetics in Selected Benchmark Soils of Indo-Gangetic Plains, India

  • Research Article
  • Published:
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, India Section B: Biological Sciences Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A study was undertaken in the established benchmark (BM) soil series in different agro-ecological sub-regions of Indo-Gangetic Plains (IGPs), India with an objective to assess the urease activity and its kinetics at different soil depths. The urease activity declined with increase in soil depth in all the selected BM soils of IGP. The mean urea hydrolysis in the surface horizon (0–30 cm; 18.2 µg \( {\text{NH}}_{4}^{ + } \)/h) was 2.6-folds higher than the sub-surface horizon (121–150 cm; 7.01 µg \( {\text{NH}}_{4}^{ + } \)/h). The enzyme velocity (V max ) and enzyme efficiency (K m /V max ) of urease hydrolysis were at par in surface and sub-surface horizons. The average K m value of urease enzyme in surface and sub-surface horizons were 4.53 and 3.96 mM, respectively. The coefficient of variation, K m for surface horizons showed higher variability and low affinity of soil urease towards substrate urea than the sub-surface horizon. Negative Pearson’s correlation coefficient was recorded between urease activity and soil depth (R = −0.86), while significant positive correlation was observed between urease activity with organic carbon (R = 0.81) and nitrogen (R = 0.81).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Fließbach A, Oberholzer HR, Gunst L, Mader P (2007) Soil organic matter and biological soil quality indicators after 21 years of organic and conventional farming. Agric Ecosyst Environ 118:273–284

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Rao DLN, Ghai SK (1985) Urease and dehydrogenase activity of alkali and reclaimed soils. Aust J Soil Res 23:661–665

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. McCarty GW, Bremner JM (1991) Production of urease by microbial activity in soil under aerobic and aerobic condition. Boil Fertil Soils 11:228–230

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Tabatabai MA (1994) Soil enzymes. In: Weaver RW, Angel JS, Bottomley PS (eds) Methods of soil analysis. Part 2. Microbial and biochemical properties. Soil Science Society of America, Madison, pp 775–833

    Google Scholar 

  5. Bremner JM, Mulvaney RL (1978) Urease activity in soils. In: Burns RG (ed) Soil enzymes, Academic Press, New York, pp 149–196

  6. O’Tool P, Morgan MA, McGarry SJ (1985) A comparative study of urease activities in pasture and tillage soils. Commun Soil Sci Plant Anal 16:733–759

    Google Scholar 

  7. Cookson P, Lepiece GL (1996) Urease enzyme activity of soils of Batinah region of Sultanate of Oman. J Arid Environ 32:225–238

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Kiss S, Dracan-Bularda M, Radulesu D (1975) Biological significance of enzymes accumulated in soil. Adv Agron 27:25–87

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Reddy UR, Reddy SM (2008) Urease activity in soil as influenced by integrated nutrient management in tomato–onion cropping system. Asian J Soil Sci 3:30–32

    Google Scholar 

  10. Pal DK, Bhattacharyya T, Srivastava P, Chandran P, Ray SK (2009) Soils of the Indo-Gangetic Plains: their historical perspective and management. Curr Sci 96(9):1193

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Baldrian P (2009) Microbial enzyme catalyzed processes in soils and their analysis. Plant Soil Environ 55(9):370–378

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Shan Q, Yu Y, Yu J, Zhang J (2008) Soil enzyme activities and their indication for fertility of urban forest soil. Front Environ Sci China 2(2):218–223

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Manunza B, Deiana S, Pintore M, Gessa C (1999) The binding mechanism of urea, hydroxamic acid and N-(n-butyl)-phosphoric triamide to the urease active site. A comparative molecular dynamic study. Soil Biol Biochem 31:789–796

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Watson CJ, Miller H (1996) Short-term effects of urea amended with the urease inhibitor N-(n-butyl) thiophosphoric triamide on perennial ryegrass. Plant Soil 184:33–45

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Juan YH, Chen ZH, Chen LJ, Wu ZJ, Wang R, Sun WT, Zhang YL (2009) Kinetic and thermodynamic behaviors of soil urease as affected by urease inhibitors. RC Suelo Nutr Veg 10(1):1–11

    Google Scholar 

  16. Susanne K, Tabatabai MA (2000) Urease activity of microbial biomass in soils. Soil Biol Biochem 31:205–211

    Google Scholar 

  17. Fu L, Yang W, Wei Y (2009) Effects of copper pollution on the activity of soil invertase and urease in loquat orchards. Chin J Geochem 28:076–080

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Zhang YL, Sun CcX, Chen LJ, Duan ZH (2009) Catalytic potential of soil hydrolases in northeast china under different soil moisture conditions. J Soil Sci Plant Nutr 9(2):116–124

    Google Scholar 

  19. Yang Z, Liu S, Zheng D, Feng S (2006) Effects of cadmium, zinc and lead on soil enzyme activities. J Environ Sci 18(6):1135–1141

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Wyszkowska J, Kucharski J, Lajszner W (2006) The effects of copper on soil biochemical properties and its interaction with other heavy metals. Pol J Environ Stud 15(6):927–934

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Gioacchini P, Nastri A, Marzadori C, Giovannini C, Antisari LV, Gessa C (2002) Influence of urease and nitrification inhibitors on N losses from soils fertilized with urea. Biol Fertil Soils 36:129–135

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Li CR, Xu JW, Song HY, Li CY, Zheng L, Wang WD, Wang YH (2006) Soil enzyme activities in different plantations in lowlands of the Yellow River Delta, China. Acta Phys Sin 30:802–809

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Fidaleo M, Lavecchia R (2003) Kinetic study of enzymatic urea hydrolysis in the pH range 4–9. Chem Biochem Eng Q 17(4):311–318

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Zornoza R, Guerrero C, Mataix-Solera JM, Arcenegui V, Garcia-Orenes F, Mataix-Beneyto J (2006) Assessing air-drying and rewetting pre-treatment effect on some soils enzyme activities under Mediterranean conditions. Soil Biol Biochem 38:2125–2135

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Masciandaro G, Ceccanti B, Ronchi V (2000) Kinetic parameters of dehydrogenase in the assessment of response of soil to vermicompost and inorganic fertilizers. Biol Fertil Soils 32(6):479–483

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Morrison JF (1982) The slow-binding and slow, tight-binding inhibition of enzyme catalyzed reactions. Trends Biochem Sci 7:102–105

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Zhou LK (1987) Soil enzymology. Science Press, Beijing

    Google Scholar 

  28. Nannipieri P, Ceccanti B, Cervelli S, Conti C (1982) Hydrolases extracted from soil: kinetic parameters of several enzymes catalysing the same reaction. Soil Biol Biochem 5:429–432

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Eilers KG, Debenport S, Anderson S, Fierer N (2012) Digging deeper to find unique microbial communities: the strong effect of depth on the structure of bacterial and archaeal communities in soil. Soil Biol Biochem 50:58–65

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Rumpel C, Kogel-Knabner I (2011) Deep soil organic matter—a key but poorly understood component of terrestrial C cycle. Plant Soil 338:143–158

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Zhang L, Zhie WU, Chen L, Jiang Y, Dongpo LI (2009) Kinetics of catalase and dehydrogenase in main soil of northeast china under different condition. Agric J 4(2):113–120

  32. Pattnaik P, Mallick K, Ramakrishnan B, Adhya TK, Sethunathan N (1999) Urease activity and urea hydrolysis in tropical flooded soil unplanted or planted to rice. J Sci Food Agric 79:227–231

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Popelarova E, Vorisek K, Strnadova S (2008) Relations between activities and counts of soil microorganisms. Plant Soil Environ 54(4):163–170

    CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This financial grant received from the World Bank sponsored “National Agricultural Innovation Project” (NAIP) (Component-4: Indian Council of Agricultural Research) on “Georeferenced Soil Information System for Land Use Planning and Monitoring Soil and Land Quality for Agriculture” is gratefully acknowledged. The authors are thankful to the Directors, NBAIM and NBSS and LUP for extending facilities to carry out this research work.

Conflict of interest

There is no conflict of interest between the authors on this publication.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Alok K. Srivastava.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Kumar, A., Srivastava, A.K., Velmourougane, K. et al. Urease Activity and Its Kinetics in Selected Benchmark Soils of Indo-Gangetic Plains, India. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci., India, Sect. B Biol. Sci. 85, 407–413 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40011-014-0352-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40011-014-0352-5

Keywords

Navigation