Abstract
A study was undertaken in the established benchmark (BM) soil series in different agro-ecological sub-regions of Indo-Gangetic Plains (IGPs), India with an objective to assess the urease activity and its kinetics at different soil depths. The urease activity declined with increase in soil depth in all the selected BM soils of IGP. The mean urea hydrolysis in the surface horizon (0–30 cm; 18.2 µg \( {\text{NH}}_{4}^{ + } \)/h) was 2.6-folds higher than the sub-surface horizon (121–150 cm; 7.01 µg \( {\text{NH}}_{4}^{ + } \)/h). The enzyme velocity (V max ) and enzyme efficiency (K m /V max ) of urease hydrolysis were at par in surface and sub-surface horizons. The average K m value of urease enzyme in surface and sub-surface horizons were 4.53 and 3.96 mM, respectively. The coefficient of variation, K m for surface horizons showed higher variability and low affinity of soil urease towards substrate urea than the sub-surface horizon. Negative Pearson’s correlation coefficient was recorded between urease activity and soil depth (R = −0.86), while significant positive correlation was observed between urease activity with organic carbon (R = 0.81) and nitrogen (R = 0.81).
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs40011-014-0352-5/MediaObjects/40011_2014_352_Fig1_HTML.gif)
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs40011-014-0352-5/MediaObjects/40011_2014_352_Fig2_HTML.gif)
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs40011-014-0352-5/MediaObjects/40011_2014_352_Fig3_HTML.gif)
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs40011-014-0352-5/MediaObjects/40011_2014_352_Fig4_HTML.gif)
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Fließbach A, Oberholzer HR, Gunst L, Mader P (2007) Soil organic matter and biological soil quality indicators after 21 years of organic and conventional farming. Agric Ecosyst Environ 118:273–284
Rao DLN, Ghai SK (1985) Urease and dehydrogenase activity of alkali and reclaimed soils. Aust J Soil Res 23:661–665
McCarty GW, Bremner JM (1991) Production of urease by microbial activity in soil under aerobic and aerobic condition. Boil Fertil Soils 11:228–230
Tabatabai MA (1994) Soil enzymes. In: Weaver RW, Angel JS, Bottomley PS (eds) Methods of soil analysis. Part 2. Microbial and biochemical properties. Soil Science Society of America, Madison, pp 775–833
Bremner JM, Mulvaney RL (1978) Urease activity in soils. In: Burns RG (ed) Soil enzymes, Academic Press, New York, pp 149–196
O’Tool P, Morgan MA, McGarry SJ (1985) A comparative study of urease activities in pasture and tillage soils. Commun Soil Sci Plant Anal 16:733–759
Cookson P, Lepiece GL (1996) Urease enzyme activity of soils of Batinah region of Sultanate of Oman. J Arid Environ 32:225–238
Kiss S, Dracan-Bularda M, Radulesu D (1975) Biological significance of enzymes accumulated in soil. Adv Agron 27:25–87
Reddy UR, Reddy SM (2008) Urease activity in soil as influenced by integrated nutrient management in tomato–onion cropping system. Asian J Soil Sci 3:30–32
Pal DK, Bhattacharyya T, Srivastava P, Chandran P, Ray SK (2009) Soils of the Indo-Gangetic Plains: their historical perspective and management. Curr Sci 96(9):1193
Baldrian P (2009) Microbial enzyme catalyzed processes in soils and their analysis. Plant Soil Environ 55(9):370–378
Shan Q, Yu Y, Yu J, Zhang J (2008) Soil enzyme activities and their indication for fertility of urban forest soil. Front Environ Sci China 2(2):218–223
Manunza B, Deiana S, Pintore M, Gessa C (1999) The binding mechanism of urea, hydroxamic acid and N-(n-butyl)-phosphoric triamide to the urease active site. A comparative molecular dynamic study. Soil Biol Biochem 31:789–796
Watson CJ, Miller H (1996) Short-term effects of urea amended with the urease inhibitor N-(n-butyl) thiophosphoric triamide on perennial ryegrass. Plant Soil 184:33–45
Juan YH, Chen ZH, Chen LJ, Wu ZJ, Wang R, Sun WT, Zhang YL (2009) Kinetic and thermodynamic behaviors of soil urease as affected by urease inhibitors. RC Suelo Nutr Veg 10(1):1–11
Susanne K, Tabatabai MA (2000) Urease activity of microbial biomass in soils. Soil Biol Biochem 31:205–211
Fu L, Yang W, Wei Y (2009) Effects of copper pollution on the activity of soil invertase and urease in loquat orchards. Chin J Geochem 28:076–080
Zhang YL, Sun CcX, Chen LJ, Duan ZH (2009) Catalytic potential of soil hydrolases in northeast china under different soil moisture conditions. J Soil Sci Plant Nutr 9(2):116–124
Yang Z, Liu S, Zheng D, Feng S (2006) Effects of cadmium, zinc and lead on soil enzyme activities. J Environ Sci 18(6):1135–1141
Wyszkowska J, Kucharski J, Lajszner W (2006) The effects of copper on soil biochemical properties and its interaction with other heavy metals. Pol J Environ Stud 15(6):927–934
Gioacchini P, Nastri A, Marzadori C, Giovannini C, Antisari LV, Gessa C (2002) Influence of urease and nitrification inhibitors on N losses from soils fertilized with urea. Biol Fertil Soils 36:129–135
Li CR, Xu JW, Song HY, Li CY, Zheng L, Wang WD, Wang YH (2006) Soil enzyme activities in different plantations in lowlands of the Yellow River Delta, China. Acta Phys Sin 30:802–809
Fidaleo M, Lavecchia R (2003) Kinetic study of enzymatic urea hydrolysis in the pH range 4–9. Chem Biochem Eng Q 17(4):311–318
Zornoza R, Guerrero C, Mataix-Solera JM, Arcenegui V, Garcia-Orenes F, Mataix-Beneyto J (2006) Assessing air-drying and rewetting pre-treatment effect on some soils enzyme activities under Mediterranean conditions. Soil Biol Biochem 38:2125–2135
Masciandaro G, Ceccanti B, Ronchi V (2000) Kinetic parameters of dehydrogenase in the assessment of response of soil to vermicompost and inorganic fertilizers. Biol Fertil Soils 32(6):479–483
Morrison JF (1982) The slow-binding and slow, tight-binding inhibition of enzyme catalyzed reactions. Trends Biochem Sci 7:102–105
Zhou LK (1987) Soil enzymology. Science Press, Beijing
Nannipieri P, Ceccanti B, Cervelli S, Conti C (1982) Hydrolases extracted from soil: kinetic parameters of several enzymes catalysing the same reaction. Soil Biol Biochem 5:429–432
Eilers KG, Debenport S, Anderson S, Fierer N (2012) Digging deeper to find unique microbial communities: the strong effect of depth on the structure of bacterial and archaeal communities in soil. Soil Biol Biochem 50:58–65
Rumpel C, Kogel-Knabner I (2011) Deep soil organic matter—a key but poorly understood component of terrestrial C cycle. Plant Soil 338:143–158
Zhang L, Zhie WU, Chen L, Jiang Y, Dongpo LI (2009) Kinetics of catalase and dehydrogenase in main soil of northeast china under different condition. Agric J 4(2):113–120
Pattnaik P, Mallick K, Ramakrishnan B, Adhya TK, Sethunathan N (1999) Urease activity and urea hydrolysis in tropical flooded soil unplanted or planted to rice. J Sci Food Agric 79:227–231
Popelarova E, Vorisek K, Strnadova S (2008) Relations between activities and counts of soil microorganisms. Plant Soil Environ 54(4):163–170
Acknowledgments
This financial grant received from the World Bank sponsored “National Agricultural Innovation Project” (NAIP) (Component-4: Indian Council of Agricultural Research) on “Georeferenced Soil Information System for Land Use Planning and Monitoring Soil and Land Quality for Agriculture” is gratefully acknowledged. The authors are thankful to the Directors, NBAIM and NBSS and LUP for extending facilities to carry out this research work.
Conflict of interest
There is no conflict of interest between the authors on this publication.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Kumar, A., Srivastava, A.K., Velmourougane, K. et al. Urease Activity and Its Kinetics in Selected Benchmark Soils of Indo-Gangetic Plains, India. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci., India, Sect. B Biol. Sci. 85, 407–413 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40011-014-0352-5
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40011-014-0352-5