Skip to main content

Micromorphological and Anatomical Characteristics of the Genus Chrysophthalmum Schultz Bip. (Asteraceae) Growing in Turkey

Abstract

The genus Chrysophthalmum (Asteraceae) is represented by five species in the world. Three species of this genus are naturally grown in Turkey. The species growing in Turkey are C. montanum (DC.) Boiss., C. dichotomum Boiss. and Heldr. and C. gueneri Aytac and Anderb. Except C. montanum; the other species are endemic for Turkey. In the present study, micromorphological and anatomical characteristics of these species by using light microscopy (LM) and scanning electron microscopy (SEM) have been comparatively presented for the first time. The micromorphological studies are related to trichomes and cypsela. In anatomical studies, cross-sections of the stem, and leaf have been examined. In addition, to show stomatal distribution and anatomy on adaxial and abaxial leaves, surface sections of the leaves have been taken and stomatal index calculated. The features of stems, leaves, trichomes and cypsela have been found to be significant to distinguish the species. Mesophyll structure, number of vascular bundles in midrib, presence or absence of sclerenchymatous fibers in leaf, trichome types, presence or absence of pappus in cypsela, presence or absence of hair on cypsela surface are important diagnostic characters. A diagnostic key based on combined leaf, trichome and cypsela characteristics of the Chrysophthalmum species has been given.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

References

  1. 1.

    Hind DJN, Beentje HJ (1994) Compositae: systematics. Proceedings of the International Compositae Conference, Kew 1:1–7

  2. 2.

    Doğan B, Duran A, Hakkı E (2009) Numerical analyses of wild Jurinea spp. (Asteraceae) in Turkey. Bangladesh J Bot 38(1):47–53

    Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    Bremer K (1994) Compositae, cladistics and classification. Timber, Portland

    Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    Martin E, Çetin Ö, Makbul S et al (2012) Karyology of the Scorzonera L. (Asteraceae) taxa from Turkey. Turk J Biol 36:187–199

    Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    Anderberg AA, Baldwin BG, Bayer RG et al (2007) Compositae. In: Kadereit JW, Jeffrey C (eds) The families and genera of vascular plants, vol 8. Springer, New York, pp 61–621

  6. 6.

    Davis PH (1975) Flora of Turkey and the East Aegean Islands, vol 5. Edinburgh University Press, Edinburgh

  7. 7.

    Davis PH, Tan K, Mill RR (1988) Flora of Turkey and the East Aegean Islands, vol 10. Edinburgh University Press, Edinburgh

  8. 8.

    Özhatay N, Kültür Ş (2006) Check–list of additional taxa to the supplement Flora of Turkey III. Turk J Bot 30:281–316

    Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    Grierson AJC (1975) Chrysophthalmum Schultz Bip. In: Davis PH (ed) Flora of Turkey and the East Aegean Islands, vol. 5. Edinburgh University Press, pp 52–53

  10. 10.

    Rechinger KH (1980) Chrysophthalmum Schultz–Bip. In Kotschy. In: Rechinger KH (ed) Flora Iranica 145. Compositae IV–Inuleae. Akademische Druck und Verlagsanstalt, Graz, pp 131–132

    Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    Aytac Z, Anderberg AA (2001) A new species of Chrysophthalmum Schultz Bip. (Asteraceae–Inuleae) from Turkey. Bot J Linn Soc 137:211–214

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    Metcalfe CR, Chalk L (1950) Anatomy of dicotyledons. Clarendon, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  13. 13.

    Dar GH, Khuroo AA, Reddy CS, Malik AH (2012) Impediment to taxonomy and its impact on biodiversity science: an Indian perspective. Proc Natl Acad Sci India Sect B Biol Sci 82(2):235–240

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. 14.

    Hoşgören H, Saya Ö (2006) Chromosome numbers in two species of Onobrychis Miller. Adv Food Sci 28(2):120–122

    Google Scholar 

  15. 15.

    Khatun S, Cakilcioglu U, Chatterjee NC (2011) Pharmacognostic value of leaf anatomy and trichome morphology for identification of forskolin in a novel medicinal plant Coleus forskohlii Briq. Biol Diver Conserv 4(2):165–171

    Google Scholar 

  16. 16.

    Polat R, Satıl F, Selvi S (2010) Anatomical and ecological investigations on some Salvia L. (Lamiaceae) spe-cies growing naturally in the vicinity of Balıkesir. J Appl Biol Sci 4(2):29–33

    Google Scholar 

  17. 17.

    Rao RR (2012) Plant taxonomy in tropical countries: a plea for urgent resurrection. Proc Natl Acad Sci India Sect B Biol Sci 82(2):259–264

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. 18.

    Sharma G (2013) Role of phytochemicals and nucleic acids in solving taxonomic problems. Proc Natl Acad Sci India Sect B Biol Sci 83(2):141–145

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. 19.

    Yakar-Tan N (1982) Bitki mikroskopisi klavuz kitabı. İstanbul University, Faculty of Science Publishing, İstanbul

    Google Scholar 

  20. 20.

    Meidner H, Mansfield TA (1968) Physiology of stomata. McGraw–Hill, New York

    Google Scholar 

  21. 21.

    Dilcher D (1974) Approaches to the identification of angiosperm leaf remains. Bot Rev 40(1):3–157

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. 22.

    Wilkinson HP (1979) The plant surface (mainly leaf). In: Metcalfe CR, Chalk L (eds) Anatomy of the dicotyledons, vol I. Clarendon, Oxford, pp 97–165

  23. 23.

    Milan P, Hissae AH, Gloria BA (2006) Comparative leaf morphology and anatomy of three Asteraceae species. Braz Arch Biol Technol 49:135–144

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. 24.

    Stebbins GL (1953) A new classification of the tribe Cichoriae, family Compositae. Madrono 12:65–81

    Google Scholar 

  25. 25.

    Faust WZ, Jones SB (1973) The systematic value of trichome complements in a North American group of Vernonia (Compositae). Rhodora 75:517–528

    Google Scholar 

  26. 26.

    Napp-Zinn K, Eble M (1980) Beitrage zur systematischen Anatomie der Asteraceae–Anthemideae: Die Trichome. Plant Syst Evol 136:169–207

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. 27.

    Sahu TR (1982) Trichome studies in Parthenium hysterophorus and their taxonomic importance. Feddes Repert 93:437–441

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. 28.

    Sahu TR (1984) Taxonomic implications of trichome complements to Vernonia (Compositae) in India. Feddes Repert 95:237–249

    Google Scholar 

  29. 29.

    Hoot SB (1991) Phylogeny of the Ranunculaceae based on epidermal microcharacters and macromorphology. Syst Bot 16:741–755

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. 30.

    Al-Shamary KIA, Gornall RJ (1994) Trichome anatomy of the Saxifragaceae s. l. from the southern hemisphere. Bot J Linn Soc 114:99–131

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. 31.

    Krak K, Mraz P (2008) Trichomes in the tribe Lactuceae (Asteraceae) taxonomic implications. Biologia 63(5):616–630

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. 32.

    Kallersjö M (1986) Fruit structure and generic delimitation of Athanasia (Asteraceae–Anthemideae) and related South African genera. Nordic J Bot 5:527–542

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. 33.

    Mukherjee SK, Sarkar AK (2001) Morphology and structure of Cypsela in thirteen species of the tribe Astereae (Asteraceae). Phytomorphology 51(1):17–26

    Google Scholar 

  34. 34.

    Ciccarelli D, Garbari F, Pagni AM (2007) Glandular hairs of the ovary: a helpful character for Asteroideae (Asteraceae) taxonomy? Ann Bot Fennici 44:1–7

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors are grateful to Basic Sciences Research and Applied Center of Balikesir University (BUTAM) for SEM studies.

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ugur Cakilcioglu.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Selvi, S., Paksoy, M.Y., Polat, R. et al. Micromorphological and Anatomical Characteristics of the Genus Chrysophthalmum Schultz Bip. (Asteraceae) Growing in Turkey. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci., India, Sect. B Biol. Sci. 84, 431–438 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40011-013-0231-5

Download citation

Keywords

  • Anatomy
  • Asteraceae
  • Chrysophthalmum
  • Cypsela
  • Micromorphology
  • Trichome