Skip to main content
Log in

Evaluation of Spinosad Against Pyrethroid Resistant Population of Helicoverpa armigera (Hubner)

  • Research Article
  • Published:
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, India Section B: Biological Sciences Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The bouquet bioassay experiments under laboratory conditions revealed that the corrected percentage mortality of Helicoverpa armigera was 75.9–82.0 % at recommended dose of spinosad. Good biological efficacy of this molecule was also reflected in the suppression of larval population and reduction of damage to bolls, squares, locules and seed cotton in the field.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Ramasubramanian T, Regupathy A (2003) Relative fitness of pyrethroid selected populations of Helicoverpa armigera Hubner. Asian J Plant Sci 2:1170–1174

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Banerjee SK, Turkar KS, Wanjari RR (2000) Evaluation of newer insecticides for the control of bollworms in cotton. Pestology 24:14–16

    Google Scholar 

  3. Ramasubramanian T, Regupathy A (2003) Magnitude and mechanism of insecticide resistance in Helicoverpa armigera Hubner. Asian J Plant Sci 3:94–100

    Google Scholar 

  4. Kirst HA, Michel KH, Mynderse JS, Chao EH, Yao RC, Nakatsukasa WM, Doeck LD, Occlowitz J, Paschel JW, Deeter JB, Thompson GD (1992) Discovery, isolation and structure elucidation of a family of structurally unique fermentation-derived tetracyclic macrolides. In: Fenyes JG, Steffens JJ (eds) Synthesis and chemistry of agrochemicals III. ACS Publications, Washington, pp 214–225

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  5. Armes NJ, Bond GS, Cooter RJ (1992) The laboratory culture and development of Helicoverpa armigera. Natural Resources Institute Bulletin. Natural Resources Institute, Chatham, p 57

    Google Scholar 

  6. Daly JC, Fisk JH, Forrester NW (1988) Selective mortality in field trials between strains of Heliothis armigera (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) resistant and susceptible to pyrethroids: functional dominance of resistance and age class. J Econ Entomol 81:1000–1007

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Armes NJ, Jadhav DR, DeSouza KR (1996) A survey of insecticide resistance in Helicoverpa armigera in the Indian sub-continent. Bull Entomol Res 86:499–514

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. SPSS for Windows (1999) User’s manual, version 10.0. SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA

  9. Snedecor GW, Cochran WG (1989) Statistical methods, 8th edn. Iowa State University Press, Ames

    Google Scholar 

  10. Ramasubramanian T, Regupathy A (2004) Laboratory and field evaluation of spinosad against pyrethroid resistant population of Helicoverpa armigera Hubner. J Biol Sci 4(2):142–145

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Watson GB (2001) Actions of insecticidal spinosyns on aminobutyric acid responses from small-diameter cockroach neurons. Pestic Biochem Physiol 71:20–28

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Narahashi T (1971) Effects of insecticides on excitable tissues. Adv Insect Physiol 8:1–93

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Narahashi T (1976) Effects of insecticides on nervous conduction and synaptic transmission. In: Wilkinson CF (ed) Insect biochemistry and physiology. Plenum press, New York, pp 327–352

    Google Scholar 

  14. Narahashi T (1992) Nerve membrane Na+ channels as targets of insecticides. Trends Pharmacol Sci 13:236–241

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Allen CT, Frizzell S, Earnest L, Tugwell P, Haynes J, Willis S, Riddle A, Scott K (1997) Bollworm control test 1996. Special report agricultural experiment station, Division of Agriculture, University of Arkansas 83:184–187

  16. Murray DA, Lloyd HRJ (1997) The effect of spinosad (tracer) on arthropod pests and beneficial population in Australian cotton. Proceedings Beltwide Cotton Conference, New Orleans, 6–10 January 1997, pp. 1087–1091

  17. Pan DM, Ma Y, Jia HQ (2000) An experiment on the application of 48 % spinosad solution for the control of bollworm. China Cottons 28:15–16

    Google Scholar 

  18. Hasan MU, Wakil W, Rasool A (2001) Comparative efficacy of some traditional and newly introduced insecticides against Helicoverpa armigera on cotton. Pak J Agric Sci 38:47–48

    Google Scholar 

  19. Vadodaria MP, Patel UG, Maisuria IM, Patel CJ, Patel RB (2001) Bio-efficacy of a new insecticide spinosad against bollworms of cotton. Pestology 25:24–28

    Google Scholar 

  20. Gowda DK, Yelshetty S, Kotikal YK, Patil BV, Benagi VI (2002) Validation of integrated pest management of pigeon pea pod borer Helicoverpa armigera. Int Chickpea Pigeonpea Newsl 9:46–47

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors are grateful to Vichiter Singh for technical assistance with these experiments. The financial supports from the Ministry of Agriculture, Government of India and Central Institute for Cotton Research, Nagpur for the project Insect Pest Resistance Management (TMC-MM-II) is greatly acknowledged.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Vinod Nogia.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Nogia, V., Meghwal, R.R. Evaluation of Spinosad Against Pyrethroid Resistant Population of Helicoverpa armigera (Hubner). Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci., India, Sect. B Biol. Sci. 83, 329–332 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40011-012-0151-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40011-012-0151-9

Keywords

Navigation