Abstract
Gamma ray mass attenuation of some nonlinear optical (NLO) materials has been studied experimentally using transmission experiment in the energy range 122–1330 keV. The selected NLO materials were radiated by radioactive point sources (57Co, 133Ba, 22Na, 137Cs and 60Co) of strength 5 mCi. Theoretical values were calculated on the basis of mixture rule using WinXCOM program. Good agreement between theoretical and experimental values was observed. Gamma ray mass attenuation coefficient (μm) values were used to determine other radiological parameters such as σt,a, σt,el, Zeff and Neff. The behavior of μm with the incident photon energy (E) has been discussed. From the obtained results, it is observed that the radiological parameters are affected severely by increasing the intensity of photon energy.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Suresh Kumar MR, Ravindra HJ, Dharmaprakash SM (2007) Synthesis, crystal growth and characterization of glycine lithium sulphate. J Cryst Growth 306:361–365
Chemla DS, Zyss J (1987) Nonlinear optical properties of organic molecules and crystals, vol 1. Academic, Orland
Bhadauria S, Das M, Saxena S, Prasad R, Sen P, Dwivedi R (2011) Recent progress in non-linear optical material, syntheses, characterization and geometry optimization of dicinnamalacetone. Arch Phys Res 2:36–44
Baltas H, Celik S, Cevik U, Yamaz E (2007) Measurements of mass attenuation coefficient and effective atomic number for MgB2 using X-ray energies. Radiat Meas 42:55–60
Manohara SR, Hanagodimath SM (2007) Studies on effective atomic numbers and electron densities of essential amino acids in the energy range 1 keV–100 GeV. Nucl Instrum Methods Phys Res B 258:321–328
Medhat ME, Singh VP (2014) Mass attenuation coefficients of composite materials by Geant4, XCOM and experimental data: comparative study. Radiat Eff Defects Solids 169:800–807
Medhat ME, Demir N, Tarim UA, Gurler O (2014) Calculation of gamma-ray mass attenuation coefficients of some Egyptian soil samples using Monte Carlo methods. Radiat Eff Defects Solids 169:706–714
Tekin HO (2016) MCNP-X Monte Carlo Code application for mass attenuation coefficients of concrete at different energies by modeling 3 × 3 inch NaI (Tl) detector and comparison with XCOM and Monte Carlo data. Science and technology of nuclear installations
Singh VP, Shirmardi SP, Medhat ME, Badiger NM (2015) Determination of mass attenuation coefficient for some polymers using Monte Carlo simulation. Vacuum 119:284–288
Bhosale RR, Gaikwad DK, Pawar PP, Rode MN (2016) Interaction studies and Gamma-Ray properties of some low-z materials. Nucl Technol Radiat Prot 31(2):135–141
Kumar A, Gaikwad DK, Obaid SS, Tekin HO, Agar O, Sayyed MI (2019) Experimental studies and Monte Carlo simulations on gamma ray shielding competence of (30 + x) PbO–10WO3–10Na2O–10MgO-(40-x)–B2O3 glasses. Prog Nucl Energy 1:1. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pnucene.2019.103047
Han I, Demir L, Sahin M (2009) Determination of mass attenuation coefficient, effective atomic number and electron number for some natural minerals. Radiat Phys Chem 78:760–764
Han I, Demir L (2009) Studies on mass attenuation coefficient, effective atomic and electron number of Ti and Ni alloy. Radiat Meas 44:289–294
Hubbell JH (1982) Photon mass attenuation and energy absorption. Int J Appl Radiat Isot 33:1269–1290
Hubbell JH, Seltzer SM (1995) Tables of X-ray mass attenuation coefficients and mass energy absorption coefficients 1 keV to 20 MeV for elements Z = 1 to 92 and 48 additional substances of dosimetric interest (No. PB-95-220539/XAB; NISTIR-5632). National Inst. of Standards and Technology-PL, Gaithersburg, MD (United States). Ionizing Radiation Div
Berger MJ, Hubbell JH (1987) XCOM: photon cross section on a personal computer. No. NBSIR-87-3597. National Bureau of Standards
Gerward L, Guilbert N, Jensen KB, Levring H (2004) WinXCOM-A program for calculating X-ray attenuation coefficients. Radiat Phys Chem 71:653–654. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.radphyschem.2004.04.040
Kaewkhao J, Laopaiboon J, Chewpraditkul W (2008) Determination of effective atomic numbers and effective electron densities for Cu/Zn alloy. J Quant Spectrosc Radioact Transf 109:1260–1265. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jqsrt.2007.10.007
Gaikwad DK, Sayyed MI, Botewad SN, Obaid Shamsan S, Khattari ZY, Gawai UP, Afaneh Feras, Shirshat MD, Pawar PP (2019) Physical, structural, optical investigation and shielding features of tungsten bismuth tellurite based glasses. J Non-Cryst Solids 503–504:158–168
Obaid SS, Sayyed MI, Gaikwad DK, Tekin HO, Elmahroug Y, Pawar PP (2018) Photon attenuation coefficients of different rock samples using MCNPX Geant4 simulation codes and experimental results: a comparison study. Radiat Eff Defects Solids 173(1–15):900–914
Gaikwad DK, Pawar PP, Selvam TP (2016) Attenuation cross sections measurements of some fatty acids in the energy range 122–1330 keV. Pramana J Phys 87:12
Awasarmol VV, Gaikwad DK, Raut SD, Pawar PP (2017) Photon interaction study of organic nonlinear optical materials in the energy range 122–1330 keV. Radiat Phys Chem 130:343–350
Awasarmol VV, Gaikwad DK, Raut SD, Pawar PP (2017) Gamma ray interaction studies of organic nonlinear optical materials in the energy range 122 keV to 1330 keV. Results Phys 7:272–279
Awasarmol VV (2017) Gamma ray attenuation parameters of inorganic nonlinear optical materials in the energy ranges 122 keV to 1330 keV. Indian J Pure Appl Phys 55:65–72
Bhosale RR, Gaikwad DK, Pawar PP, Rode MN (2016) Effects of gamma irradiation on some chemicals using an NaI (Tl) detector. Radiat Eff Defects Solids 171(5–6):398–407
Gaikwad DK, Pawar PP, Selvam TP (2017) Mass attenuation coefficients and effective atomic numbers of biological compounds for gamma ray interactions. Radiat Phys Chem 138:75–80
Gowda S, Krishnaveni S, Gowda R (2005) Studies on effective atomic number and electron densities in amino acids and sugar in the energy range 30–1333 keV. Nucl Instrum Methods Phys Res B Beam Interact Mater Atoms 239:361–369
El-Kateb AH, Rizk RAM, Abdul-Kadar AM (2000) Determination of atomic cross-section and effective atomic numbers for some alloy. Ann Nucl Energy 27:1333–1343
Jackson DF, Hawkes DJ (1981) X-ray attenuation coefficients of elements and mixtures. Phys Rep 70:169–233
Hine GJ (1952) The effective atomic numbers of materials for various gamma interactions. Phys Rev 85:725–737
Kurudirek M, Onaran T (2015) Calculation of effective atomic number and electron density of essential biomolecules for electron, proton, alpha particle and multi-energetic photon interactions. Radiat Phys Chem 112:125–138
Murthy VRK (2004) Effective atomic number for W/Cu alloy for total photon attenuation. Radiat Phys Chem 71:667–669
Limkitjaroenporn P, Kaewkhao J, Asavavisithchai S (2013) Determination of mass attenuation coefficients and effective atomic numbers for Inconel 738 alloy for different energies obtained from Compton scattering. Ann Nucl Energy 53:64–68
Demir D, Tursucu A, Oznuluer T (2012) Studies on mass attenuation coefficient, effective atomic number and electron density of some vitamins. Radiat Environ Biophys 51:469–475
Chanthima N, Kaewkhao J, Limsuwan P (2012) Study of photon interactions and shielding properties of silicate glasses containing Bi2O3, BaO and PbO in the energy region of 1 keV to 100 GeV. Ann Nucl Energy 41:119–124
Sayyed MI, Elbashir BO, Tekin HO, Altunsoy EE, Gaikwad DK (2018) Radiation shielding properties of pentaternary borate glasses using MCNPX code. J Phys Chem Solids 121:17–21
Salehi D, Sardari D, Jozani MS (2015) Investigation of some radiation shielding parameters in soft tissue. J Radiat Res Appl Sci 8:439–445
Creagh DC (1987) The resolution of discrepancies in tables of photon attenuation coefficient. Nucl Instrum Methods A 255:1–16
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Awasarmol, V.V., Gaikwad, D.K., Obaid, S.S. et al. Gamma Radiation Studies on Organic Nonlinear Optical Materials in the Energy Range 122–1330 keV. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci., India, Sect. A Phys. Sci. 90, 839–844 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40010-019-00636-1
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40010-019-00636-1