Advertisement

Face Recognition of Cattle: Can it be Done?

  • Santosh Kumar
  • Shrikant TiwariEmail author
  • Sanjay Kumar Singh
Review

Abstract

Missed, swapped, false insurance claimed and reallocation of cattle at slaughter houses is global problems throughout the world. Only few researches have been done so far to solve such major problems. Traditional identification approaches and non-biometrics techniques have such severe problems due to their own boundaries and limitations for the registration and traceability of cattle. These techniques are not able to provide a competent level of security to livestock/cattle. Therefore, cattle identification needs an innovative research for the development of efficient, scalable, affordable, non-invasive, automatic recognition systems for better registration, traceability and security of livestock/cattle. In this paper, an attempt has been made to solve the above problems by using computer vision approaches for cattle recognition using their facial images. The major contributions of this research are in three folds: firstly, the preparations of a facial images database of cattle, secondly, the extraction of set of discriminatory features from the database and implementation of computer vision based face recognition algorithms for recognizing cattle and finally, the experimental results and discussion of face recognition algorithms. Thus, this paper presents a comprehensive review of the performances of various computer vision and pattern recognition approaches for the application of cattle face recognition.

Keywords

Animal biometrics Face recognition Cattle identification Gaussian pyramid PCA LDA ICA 

References

  1. 1.
    Kühl HS, Burghardt T (2013) Animal biometrics: quantifying and detecting phenotypic appearance. Trends Ecol Evol 28(7):432–441CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Petersen W (1922) The identification of the bovine by means of nose-prints. J Dairy Sci 5(1):249–258CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Ramadan D, Forsyth DA, Barnard K (2006) Building models of animals from video. IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Mach Intell 28(8):1319–1334CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Johnston AM, Edwards DS (1996) Welfare implications of identification of cattle by ear tags. Vet Rec 138(25):612–614CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Wardrope DD (1995) Problems with the use of ear tags in cattle. Vet Rec 137(26):675Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Vlad MARIA, Parvulet RA, Vlad MS (2012) A survey of livestock identification systems. In: Proceedings of 13th WSEAS international conference on automation and information (ICAI12), pp 165–170Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    http://cattle-today.com/. Accessed 20 March 2014
  8. 8.
    Barron UG, Corkery G, Barry B, Butler F, McDonnell K, Ward S (2008) Assessment of retinal recognition technology as a biometric method for sheep identification. J Comput Electron Agric 60(2):156–166CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Jain AK, Flynn P, Ross AA (2007) Handbook of biometrics. Springer, New York. doi: 10.1007/978-0-387-71041-9 Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Burghardt T, Campbell N (2007) Individual animal identification using visual biometrics on deformable coat patterns. In: International conference on computer vision systems (ICVS07), vol 5, pp 1–10Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Eradus WJ, Jansen MB (1999) Animal identification and monitoring. Comput Electron Agric 24(1):91–98CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Baranov AS, Graml R, Pirchner F, Schmid DO (1993) Breed differences and intrabreed genetic variability of dermatoglyphic pattern of cattle. J Anim Breed Genet 110(1–6):385–392CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Noviyanto A, Arymurthy AM (2012) Automatic cattle identification based on muzzle photo using speed-up robust features approach. In: Proceedings of the 3rd European conference of computer science, ECCS, vol 110, p 114Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Noviyanto A, Arymurthy AM (2013) Beef cattle identification based on muzzle pattern using a matching refinement technique in the SIFT method. Comput Electron Agric 99:77–84CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Awad AI, Zawbaa HM, Mahmoud HA, Nabi EHHA, Fayed RH, Hassanien AE (2013) A robust cattle identification scheme using muzzle print images. In: Proceedings in federated conference on IEEE computer science and information systems (FedCSIS), pp 529–534Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Reed TR, Dubuf JH (1993) A review of recent texture segmentation and feature extraction techniques. CVGIP Image Underst 57(3):359–372CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Brunelli R, Poggio T (1993) Face recognition: features versus templates. IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Mach Intell 10:1042–1052CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Gross R, Matthews I, Baker S (2004) Appearance-based face recognition and light-fields. IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Mach Intell 26(4):449–465CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Yang J, Zhang D, Frangi AF, Yang JY (2004) Two-dimensional PCA: a new approach to appearance-based face representation and recognition. IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Mach Intell 26(1):131–137CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Stahl H, Schädler K, Eberhard H (2008) Capturing 2D and 3D biometric data of farm animals under real-life conditions. In: Proceedings in international conference of agricultural engineering, SPC03, C1034 (Federal Ministry for Education and Research of Germany) under grant number 17N2009Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Prodger P (2009) Darwin’s camera: art and photography in the theory of evolution. Oxford University Press, USAGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Scott DK (1978) Identification of individual Bewick’s swans by bill patterns. In: Stonehouse B (ed) Animal marking: recognition marking of animals in research. Macmillan Education, UK, pp 160–168CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Penzhorn BL (1984) A long term study of social organisation and behaviour of cape mountain zebras equus zebra zebra. Zeitschrift für Tierpsychologie 64(2):97-146CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Hady PJ, Domecq JJ, Kaneene JB (1994) Frequency and precision of body condition scoring in dairy cattle. J Dairy Sci 77(6):1543–1547CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Ferguson JD, Galligan DT, Thomsen N (1994) Principal descriptors of body condition score in Holstein cows. J Dairy Sci 77(9):2695–2703CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Wang Z, Fu Z, Wei C (2010) A RFID-based Traceability system for cattle breeding in China. In: Proceedings in international conference on computer application and system modelling (ICCASM), vol 10, pp 567–571Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Minagawa H, Fujimura T, Ichiyanagi M, Tanaka K (2002) Identification of beef cattle by analyzing images of their muzzle patterns lifted on paper. Publ Jpn Soc Agric Inform 8:596–600Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Barry B, Gonzales-Barron UA, McDonnell K, Butler F, Ward S (2007) Using muzzle pattern recognition as a biometric approach for cattle identification. Am Soc Agric Biol Eng 50(3):1073–1080Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Mishra S, Tomer OS, Kalm E (1995) Muzzle dermatoglyphics: a new method to identify bovines. Asian Livestock (FAO), pp 91–96Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Kim HT, Ikeda Y, Choi HL (2005) The identification of Japanese black cattle by their faces. Training 1:e11e12Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Burghardt T (2008) Visual animal biometrics. Doctoral dissertation, PhD thesis, University of Bristol, UKGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Turk MA, Pentland AP (1991) Face recognition using eigenfaces. In: Proceedings in IEEE computer vision and pattern recognition, pp 586–591Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    Ruiz-del-Solar J, Navarrete P (2005) Eigen space-based face recognition: a comparative study of different approaches. IEEE Trans Syst Man Cybern Part C Appl Rev 35(3):315–325CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Etemad K, Chellappa R (1997) Discriminant analysis for recognition of human face images. JOSA A 14(8):1724–1733CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Sugiyama M (2007) Dimensionality reduction of multimodal labeled data by local fisher discriminant analysis. J Mach Learn Res 8:1027–1061zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Bartlett MS, Movellan JR, Sejnowski TJ (2002) Face recognition by independent component analysis. IEEE Trans Neural Netw 3(6):1450–1464CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Liu C, Wechsler H (1999) Comparative assessment of independent component analysis (ICA) for face recognition. In: Proceedings in audio and video-based biometric person authentication (AVBPA’99), pp 211–216Google Scholar
  38. 38.
    Comon P (1994) Independent component analysis—a new concept? Signal Process 36:287–314CrossRefzbMATHADSGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Weng J, Zhang Y, Hwang WS (2003) Candid covariance-free incremental principal component analysis. IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Mach Intell 25(8):1034–1040CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Kim TK, Wong SF, Stenger B, Kittler J, Cipolla R (2007) Incremental linear discriminant analysis using sufficient spanning set approximations. In: Proceedings in IEEE conference on computer vision and pattern recognition, pp 1–8Google Scholar
  41. 41.
    Chang CC, Lin CJ (2001) LIBSVM: a library for support vector machines. http://www.csie.ntu.edu.tw/~cjlin/libsvm
  42. 42.
    Guo G, Li SZ, Chan K (2001) Face recognition by support vector machines. Image Vis Comput 19:631–638CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Fung G, Mangasarian OL (2002) Incremental support vector machine classification. In: Procceedings of 2nd SIAM international conference on data mining, Philadelphia, pp 247–260Google Scholar
  44. 44.
    Burt PJ, Adelson EH (1983) The Laplacian pyramid as a compact image code. IEEE Trans Commun 31(4):532–540CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Larkin LI, Burt PJ (1983) Multi-resolution texture energy measures. In: Proceedings in IEEE conference on computer vision and pattern recognitionGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    Pisano ED, Zong S, Hemminger BM et al (1998) Contrast limited adaptive histogram equalization image processing to improve the detection of simulated spiculations in dense mammograms. J Digit Imaging 11(4):193–200CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. 47.
    Belhumeur PN, Hespanha JP, Kriegman D (1997) Eigenfaces vs. fisherfaces: recognition using class specific linear projection. IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Mach Intell 19(7):711–720CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. 48.
    Viola P, Jones MJ (2004) Robust real-time face detection. Int J Comput Vis 57(2):137–154CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. 49.
    Becker BC, Ortiz EG (2008) Evaluation of face recognition techniques for application to face book. In: IEEE international conference on automatic face and gesture recognition, pp 1–6Google Scholar
  50. 50.
    Kitty M, Sirovich L (1990) Application of the KL procedure for the characterization of human faces, IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal Mach Intell 12(1):103–108CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. 51.
    Sirovich L, Kirby M (1987) Low-dimensional procedure for the characterization of human faces. JOSA A 4(3):519–524CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  52. 52.
    Burton AM, Miller P, Bruce V, Hancock PJB, Henderson Z (2001) Human and automatic face recognition: a comparison across image formats. Vis Res 41(24):3185–3195CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. 53.
    Mizroch SA, Harkness SAD (2003) A test of computer-assisted matching using the North Pacific humpback whale, Megaptera novaeangliae, tail flukes photograph collection. Mar Fish Rev 65:25–37Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The National Academy of Sciences, India 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  • Santosh Kumar
    • 1
  • Shrikant Tiwari
    • 2
    Email author
  • Sanjay Kumar Singh
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Computer Engineering, Indian Institute of Technology (BHU)VaranasiIndia
  2. 2.Department of Computer Science and Engineering, Faculty of Engineering and TechnologyShri Shankaracharya Group of InstitutionBhilaiIndia

Personalised recommendations