Trends in Depth-Wise Occurrence of Potential Fishing Zones in North Andhra Pradesh Coast

  • Loveson L. EdwardEmail author
  • Mamidi Satish Kumar
  • Pilli Suresh Kumar
  • Shubhadeep Ghosh
Short Communication


The potential fishing zone (PFZ) advisories for north Andhra Pradesh coast from Indian National Centre for Ocean Information Services, Hyderabad, were analyzed year-wise for 2 years 2012–2013 (January to December) for frequency of its occurrences at different depths. Grid-wise plotting of PFZs showed that high and very high frequency grids were less abundant in near-shore coastal regions. The plotting also revealed that of the three zones compared, continental slope area, which is beyond 100 m depth, is having the maximum number of very high frequency hit grids, followed by mid-continental shelf area which is between 50 and 100 m depth. It is also noted that a trend of frequency of occurrence of PFZs is on the rise as the depth increases up to 200 m and further, the frequencies started decreasing. There is also an increasing trend in the frequency of occurrence of PFZs as we are moving towards the higher latitudes from Kakinada waters to Kalingapatnam waters.


Potential fishing zone Depth-wise Region North Andhra Pradesh 



The authors are very much grateful to the Director, ICAR-Central Marine Fisheries Research Institute, Kochi, and Head, FEM Division, for their constant encouragement, support and facilities rendered during the course of this study.


  1. 1.
    Makris NC, Ratilal P, Jagannathan S, Gong Z, Andrews M, Bertsatos I, Godo OR, Nero RW, Jech JM (2009) Critical population density triggers rapid formation of vast oceanic fish shoals. Science 323:1734–1737ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Nayak S (2004) Role of remote Sensing to integrated coastal zone management. In: Altan O (eds) Proceedings of ISPRS XX congress, Istanbul, Turkey, vol XXXV, Part B7, pp 1232–1243Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Victor K (2012) Fisheries applications of remote sensing: an overview. Fish Res 12:10–15Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Laurs RM, Fiedler PC, Montgomery DR (1984) Albacore tuna catch distributions relative to environmental features observed from satellite. Deep Sea Res 31:1085–1099ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Kripa V, Mohamed KS, Prema D, Mohan A, Abhilash KS (2014) On the persistent occurrence of potential fishing zones in the southeastern Arabian Sea. Indian J Geo-Mar Sci 43(5):737–745Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Kamei G, Jasmin F, Shenoy L, Shukla SP (2014) Trends of potential fishing zones (PFZs) along the Mumbai coast, Maharashtra. Indian J. Fish. 61(2):140–142Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Shetye SR, Gouveia AD, Shankar D, Shenoi SSC, Vinayachandran PN, Sundar D, Michael GS, Nampoothiri G (1996) Hydrography and circulation in the western Bay of Bengal during the northeast monsoon. J Geophys Res 101:14011–14025ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Mahapatra DK, Rao AD (2017) Redistribution of low-salinity pools off east coast of India during southwest monsoon season. Estuar Coast Shelf Sci 184:21–29. ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Lucas AJ, Nash JD, Pinkel R, MacKinnon JA, Tandon A, Mahadevan A, Omand MM, Freilich M, Sengupta D, Ravichandran M, Le Boyer A (2016) Adrift upon a salinity-stratified sea: a view of upper-ocean processes in the Bay of Bengal during the southwest monsoon. Oceanography 29(2):134–145. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Vinayachandran PN, Kurian J (2007) Hydrographic observations and model simulation of the Bay of Bengal freshwater plume. Deep Sea Res 54:471–486CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The National Academy of Sciences, India 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.ICAR - Central Marine Fisheries Research Institute, Regional CentreVisakhapatnamIndia

Personalised recommendations