Advertisement

National Academy Science Letters

, Volume 42, Issue 1, pp 39–44 | Cite as

Exploring Floriculture Potential for Sustainable Livelihood of Subsistence Communities in Indian Himalaya

  • P. C. PhondaniEmail author
  • I. D. Bhatt
  • R. K. Maikhuri
  • B. P. Kothyari
  • A. Bhatt
  • V. K. Purohit
  • P. Joshi
Short Communication
  • 101 Downloads

Abstract

The present paper describes the impact of floriculture on socio-economic development of the rural communities inhabited in the Himalayan Mountains. Rural and traditional societies are interested and many are involved in floriculture business for supplementing their livelihood for sustainability in the region. Keeping this in view, two varieties of potential flowers viz. Gladiolus and Lilium were selected for cultivation in the study area through participatory approaches. A total of 150 farmers involved in cultivation of these potential flowers on 12.5 ha of land which was mostly abandoned and uncultivated. For the capacity building of the involved farmers, 50 cluster level meetings were conducted with diverse stakeholders.

Keywords

Floriculture Subsistence communities Participatory approach Livelihood Himalaya 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The authors are thankful to the Director, G. B. Pant National Institute of Himalayan Environment and Sustainable Development, Kosi- Katarmal, Almora and Prof. Sudha Bharadwaj, Principal, Government Degree College Devprayag for providing facilities. They are grateful to the local people and experts for providing valuable inputs during the field work. The authors would like to thank the anonymous reviewers for their valuable remarks/suggestions. Indian Council of Agricultural Research (ICAR-NAIP-3), Govern ment of India are also acknowledged for financial support.

References

  1. 1.
    Berger M (1989) Giving credit to women: the strengths and limitations of credit as a tool for alleviating poverty. World Dev 17:1017–1032CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Boserup E (1989) Woman’s role in economic development. Earthscan, LondonGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Kraus HU (1998) From despondency to ambitions: women’s changing perceptions of self employment: cases from India and other developing countries. Ashgate, FarnhamGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Meyer RL, Nagarajan G (2000) Rural financial markets in asia: paradigms, policies and performance. Oxford University Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Roy RK (2008) Floricultural boom in India. Chron Hortic 48:14–17Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Phondani PC, Bhatt ID, Kothyari BP (2011) Floriculture: a potential source for livelihood enhancement. Hima Paryavaran News Lett 23:14–15Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Maikhuri RK, Rawat LS, Phondani PC, Negi Vikram S, Farooquee NA, Negi Chandan (2009) Hill agriculture of Uttarakhand: policy, governance, research issues and development priorities for sustainability. Indian Econ Rev 6:116–123Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Phondani PC, Negi Vikram S, Bhatt ID, Maikhuri RK, Kothyari BP (2011) Promotion of medicinal and aromatic plants cultivation for improving livelihood security: a case study from West Himalaya, India. Int J Med Aromat Plants 1:245–252Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Census (2011) Uttarakhand population census report. www.census2011.co.in. Accessed 17 July 2012
  10. 10.
    Planning Commission (2006) Uttarakhand Development Report (1). New Delhi: Published by Academic Foundation, New DelhiGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Sahoo UK, Lalremruata J, Lalramnghinglova H, Lalremruati JH, Lalliankhuma C (2010) Livelihood generation through non-timber forest products by rural poor in and around Dampa Tiger Reserve in Mizoram. J Non Timber For Prod 17:147–161Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Mikkelsen B (1995) Methods for development work and research: a guide for practitioners. Sage Publications, DelhiGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    York RO (1998) Conducting social work research: an experimental approach. Allyn and Bacon, BostonGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Maikhuri RK, Negi Vikram S, Rawat LS, Purohit VK, Phondani PC, Chamoli KP, Farooquee NA (2009) Participatory action research framework and approaches for promoting non-timber forest products (NTFPs) in central Himalaya, Uttarakhand. Natl Acad Sci Lett 32:3–4Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Negi VS, Maikhuri RK, Rawat LS (2011) Non-timber forest products (NTFPs): a viable option for biodiversity conservation and livelihood enhancement in central Himalaya. Biodivers Conserv 20:545–559CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Singh HP, Upadhyaya RC (2007) Exploring floricultural potential in Asia for domestic and overseas markets. Indian J Hortic 52:31–37Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    European Commission (2007) India’s role in World Agriculture. EU Monitoring Agri-trade Report 03-07Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Times of India (2009) Around 54% service sector units in rural India. Times of India, 28 FebruaryGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The National Academy of Sciences, India 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • P. C. Phondani
    • 1
    Email author
  • I. D. Bhatt
    • 2
  • R. K. Maikhuri
    • 3
  • B. P. Kothyari
    • 2
  • A. Bhatt
    • 4
  • V. K. Purohit
    • 5
  • P. Joshi
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of BotanyGovernment Degree CollegeTehri GarhwalIndia
  2. 2.G. B. Pant National Institute of Himalayan Environment and Sustainable DevelopmentAlmoraIndia
  3. 3.G. B. Pant National Institute of Himalayan Environment and Sustainable DevelopmentSrinagarIndia
  4. 4.Gulf Organization for Research and DevelopmentScience and Technology Park QatarDohaQatar
  5. 5.HAPPRCH.N.B Garhwal Central UniversitySrinagarIndia

Personalised recommendations