National Academy Science Letters

, Volume 41, Issue 3, pp 161–164 | Cite as

Microbial Community Level Physiological Profiles of Active Mud Volcano Soils in Andaman and Nicobar Islands

  • N. Amaresan
  • Krishna KumarEmail author
  • G. Venkadesaperumal
  • N. Ch. Srivathsa
Short Communication


The aim of this work was to determine if any differences exist in the community-level physiological profiles (CLPP) in different regions of mud volcano. The microbial functional diversity in the four soils sampled in the vicinity of a mud volcano, Baratang, Andaman and Nicobar Islands, India, was determined using Biolog EcoPlates. Comparisons of the patterns of substrate use showed differences in the community composition, reflecting the heterogeneous distribution of microorganisms in this environment. The results showed statistically significant differences among different volcanic environments both by total colony-forming unit and by average well colour development. On the basis of similarity percentage analysis, it was found that i-erythritol was the most commonly used substrate, but substrates such as dl-glycerol phosphate (end mud volcano × point mud volcano), l-asparagine (end mud volcano × dried mud volcano) and ketobutyric acid (outside mud volcano × point mud volcano) were found in only one environment. The metabolic diversity varied depending on the environments compared, indicating specific utilization of compounds’ effect. Microbial response in terms of the overall metabolic activity in outside mud volcano was higher than in other inside mud volcano soils. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first attempt to use CLPP study in volcanic environments in the Andaman and Nicobar Islands.


CLPP Biolog Mud volcano Andaman and Nicobar Islands 



Authors thank due to research was supported by grants from National networking project entitled “Application of Microorganisms in Agriculture and Allied Sectors” of the National Bureau of Agriculturally Important Microorganisms-Indian Council of Agricultural Research (NBAIM-ICAR), Uttar Pradesh, Mau, India.


  1. 1.
    Beulig F, Heuer VB, Akob DM, Viehweger B, Elvert M, Herrmann M, Hinrichs KU, Küsel K (2015) Carbon flow from volcanic CO2 into soil microbial communities of a wetland mofette. ISME J 9:746–759CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Gittel A, Bárta J, Kohoutová I et al (2014) Distinct microbial communities associated with buried soils in the Siberian tundra. ISME J 8:841–853CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Vetriani C, Voordeckers JW, Crespo-Medina M et al (2014) Deep-sea hydrothermal vent Epsilonproteobacteria encode a conserved and widespread nitrate reduction pathway (Nap). ISME J 8:1510–1521CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Grayston SJ, Wang S, Campbell CD, Edwards AC (1998) Selective influence of plant species on microbial diversity in the rhizosphere. Soil Biol Biochem 30:369–378CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Pietikäinen J, Hiukka R, Fritze H (2000) Does short-term heating of forest humus change its properties as a substrate for microbes? Soil Biol Biochem 32:277–288CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Niemann H, Lösekann T, DeBeer D et al (2006) Novel microbial communities of the Haakon Mosby mud volcano and their role as a methane sink. Nature 443:854–858ADSCrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Jackson ML (1973) Soil chemical analysis. New Delhi, Prentice Hall of India (P) LtdGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Smalla K, Wachtendorf U, Heuer H, Liu WT, Forney L (1998) Analysis of BIOLOG GN substrate utilization patterns by microbial communities. Appl Environ Microbiol 64:1220–1225PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Garland JL, Mills AL (1991) Classification and characterization of heterotrophic microbial communities on the basis of patterns of community-level sole-carbon-source utilization. Appl Environ Microbiol 57:2351–2359PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Nallanchakravarthula S, Mahmood S, Alström S, Finlay RD (2014) Influence of soil type, cultivar and Verticillium dahliae on the structure of the root and rhizosphere soil fungal microbiome of strawberry. PLoS ONE 9:e111455ADSCrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Robach MC (1978) Effect of potassium sorbate on the growth of Pseudomonas fluorescens. J Food Sci 43:1886–1887CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Banning NC, Lalor BM, Cookson WR, Grigg AH, Murphy DV (2012) Analysis of soil microbial community level physiological profiles in native and post-mining rehabilitation forest: which substrates discriminate? Appl Soil Ecol 56:27–34CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Wawszkiewicz EJ, Barker HA (1968) Erythritol Metabolism by Propionibacterium pentosaceum the over-all reaction sequence. J Biol Chem 243:1948–1956PubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Geddes BA, Hausner G, Oresnik IJ (2013) Phylogenetic analysis of erythritol catabolic loci within the Rhizobiales and Proteobacteria. BMC Microbiol 13:46CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Barbier T, Collard F, Zúñiga-Ripa A et al (2014) Erythritol feeds the pentose phosphate pathway via three new isomerases leading to D-erythrose-4-phosphate in Brucella. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 111:17815–17820ADSCrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Janniche GS, Spliid H, Albrechtsen HJ (2012) Microbial community-level physiological profiles (CLPP) and herbicide mineralization potential in groundwater affected by agricultural land use. J Contam Hydrol 140:45–55CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Clegg CD, Lovell RDL, Hobbs PJ (2003) The impact of grassland management regime on the community structure of selected bacterial groups in soils. FEMS Microbiol Ecol 43:263–270CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Wu J, Liu Z, Wang X et al (2011) Effects of understory removal and tree girdling on soil microbial community composition and litter decomposition in two Eucalyptus plantations in South China. Funct Ecol 25:921–931CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Rosberg AK, Gruyer N, Hultberg M, Wohanka W, Alsanius BW (2014) Monitoring rhizosphere microbial communities in healthy and Pythium ultimum inoculated tomato plants in soilless growing systems. Sci Hortic 173:106–113CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Srinivas TNR, Kumar PA, Madhu S, Sunil B, Sharma TVRS, Shivaji S (2011) Cesiribacter andamanensis gen. nov., sp. nov., isolated from a soil sample from a mud volcano. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 61:1521–1527CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Kumar PA, Srinivas TNR, Manasa P, Madhu S, Shivaji S (2012) Lutibaculum baratangense gen. nov., sp. nov., a proteobacterium isolated from a mud volcano. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 62:2025–2031CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Pessi IS, Elias SDO, Simões FL, Simões JC, Macedo AJ (2012) Functional diversity of microbial communities in soils in the vicinity of Wanda Glacier, Antarctic Peninsula. Microbes Environ 27:200–203CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The National Academy of Sciences, India 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • N. Amaresan
    • 1
    • 2
  • Krishna Kumar
    • 1
    • 3
    Email author
  • G. Venkadesaperumal
    • 4
  • N. Ch. Srivathsa
    • 2
  1. 1.Division of Field CropsCentral Agricultural Research InstitutePort BlairIndia
  2. 2.C.G. Bhakta Institute of BiotechnologyUka Tarsadia UniversityBardoli, SuratIndia
  3. 3.Division of Plant PathologyIndian Agricultural Research InstituteNew DelhiIndia
  4. 4.Department of BiotechnologyBharathidsan UniversityTiruchirappalliIndia

Personalised recommendations