National Academy Science Letters

, Volume 41, Issue 2, pp 75–79 | Cite as

Deciphering Yield Sustainability of High Yielding Pearl Millet Varieties in Arid Environment

  • Anurag Saxena
  • Praveen-Kumar
  • D. V. Singh
  • N. R. Panwar
  • N. L. Joshi
Short Communication


Pearl-millet yield in arid zone vary from being < 9 to > 4 times of long-term average yield due to variations in rainfall. Thus, it is difficult to assess sustainable yield levels and manure and/or urea needed to sustain them. A long-term field experiment (1993–2013) was conducted and results were statistically inferred for above purpose. 80% variation in annual grain yield could statistically be attributed to rainfall and 10% to manure/urea and even this response was not significant in all the years. 20 kg urea-N significantly increased grain yield in five out of 21 years whereas 5 ton manure + 40 kg urea-N increased it in 17 years. Grain yield of pearl-millet cultivated without any manure/urea-N decreased at the rate of 44.9 kg ha−1 year−1. 20 and 40 kg urea-N ha−1 and 2.5 ton manure retarded this decline however 2.5 tons of manure + 20 kg urea-N, reversed this trend. 5.0 ton manure + 40 kg urea-N ha−1 increased grain yield by 33.3 kg ha−1 year−1 and maximum grain production over 21 years was also recorded in this treatment. 2.5 ton manure + 20 kg urea-N ha−1 was selected to provide highest food security. This is also supported by sustainable yield index.


Yield sustainability Long-term experiment High yielding pearl millet varieties Sustainable yield index Arid environment 



The funding was supported by Indian Council of Agricultural Research (CAZRI-T-03-64).


  1. 1.
  2. 2.
    Praveen-Kumar, Tarafdar JC, Painuli DK, Raina P, Singh MP, Beniwal RK, Soni ML, Kumar M, Santra P, Shamsuddin M (2009) Variability in arid soil characteristics. In: Kar A, Garg BK, Singh MP, Kathju S (eds) Trends in arid zone research in India. Central Arid Zone Research Institute, Jodhpur, pp 78–112Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Gupta AP, Narwal RP, Antil RS, Dev S (1992) Sustaining soil fertility with organic C, N, P, and K by using farmyard manure and fertility-N in a semiarid zone: a long-term study. Arid Soil Res Rehabil 6:243–251CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Brown JR (1994) The Sanborn Field experiment. In: Leigh RA, Johnston AE (eds) Long-term experiments in agriculture and ecological sciences. CAB Int, Wallingford, pp 39–52Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Singh M, Jones M (1997) Estimating time to detect time trends in continuous cropping. J Appl Stat 24:631–661CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Jones M, Singh M (2000) Time trends in crop yield in long term trials. Exp Agric 36:165–179CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Lakaria BL, Singh M, Reddy KS, Biswas AK, Jha P, Chaudhary RS, Singh AB, Rao AS (2012) Carbon addition and storage under integrated nutrient management in soybean–wheat cropping sequence in a Vertisol of Central India. Natl Acad Sci Lett 35(3):131–137CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Kanwar JS (1994) Relevance of soil management in sustainable agriculture in dryland agriculture. In: Biswas TD (ed) Soil management for sustainable agriculture in dryland areas. Indian Society of Soil Science, New Delhi, pp 1–11Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Singh RP, Das SK, Bhaskara R, Narayana-Reddy M (1990) Towards sustainable dryland agricultural practices. CRIDA, HyderabadGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Noy-Meir I (1973) Desert ecosystems: environment and producers. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 4:25–41CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Reynolds JF, Kemp PR, Ogle K, Fernandez RJ (2004) Modifying the ‘pulse-reserve” paradigm for deserts of North America: precipitation pulses, soil water, and plant responses. Oecologia 141:194–210ADSCrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Wanjari RH, Singh MV, Ghosh PK (2004) Sustainable yield index: an approach to evaluate the sustainability of long-term intensive cropping systems in India. J Sustain Agric 24:39–56CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Gomez KA, Gomez A (1983) Statistical procedures for agricultural research, 2nd edn. Wiley, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Loomis RS, Cooner DJ (1992) Crop ecology: productivity and management in agriculture system. Cambridge University Press, London, p 538CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Denison RF, Dennis CB, Thomas EK (2004) Crop yields over the first nine years of LTRAS, a long-term comparison of field crop systems in a Mediterranean climate. Field Crop Res 86:267–277CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Singh Y, Singh B, Ladha JK, Khind CS, Gupta RK, Meelu OP, Pasuquin E (2004) Long-term effects of organic inputs on yield and soil fertility in rice- wheat rotation. Soil Sci Soc Am J 68:845–853Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Manna MC, Swarup A, Wanjari RH, Ravankar HN, Mishra B, Saha MN, Singh YV, Sahi DK, Sarap PA (2005) Long-term effect of fertilizer and Manure application on soil organic carbon storage, soil quality and yield sustainability under sub-humid and semi-arid tropical India. Field Crops Res 93:264–280CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The National Academy of Sciences, India 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Division of Integrated Land Use Management and Farming SystemsICAR-Central Arid Zone Research InstituteJodhpurIndia
  2. 2.Division of Natural Resources and EnvironmentICAR-Central Arid Zone Research InstituteJodhpurIndia

Personalised recommendations