Advertisement

National Academy Science Letters

, Volume 40, Issue 5, pp 343–347 | Cite as

Characterization of the Thermo-Physical Performance of Bone Particles Proposed for Polymer Composites Production

  • A. D. Omah
  • E. C. Omah
  • V. S. AigbodionEmail author
  • I. C. Ezema
  • P. O. Offor
Short Communication
  • 45 Downloads

Abstract

Bone is a composite of strong but soft collagen (a protein) and hard but brittle apatite (a mineral). Cow bones are in abundance nationwide. They are usually waste materials at the abattoir and cause a great environmental degradation. The characterization of cow bone particles was investigated through x-ray diffractometer (XRD) and thermogravimetric analysis (TGA/DTA). The physical properties of the bone particles were also evaluated. The various results obtained are equivalent to those of other agro-waste materials generally used in polymer composites production. Thus, this work shows that bone particles can be a useful material for polymer composites production which can be used for production of various light weight components.

Keywords

Bone particles Thermogravimetric analysis XRD TGA DTA 

References

  1. 1.
    Osarenmwinda JO, Nwachukwu JC (2011) Electrical insulating properties of developed composite material from palm Kernel/Sawdust. In: World congress on engineering, vol 1, London, UKGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Nemli G, Samet Demirel S, Gümüşkaya E, Aslan A, Acar C (2009) Feasibility of incorporating waste grass clippings (Lolium perenne L.) in particleboard composites. Waste Manag 29(3):1129–1131CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Herrera-Franco PJ, Valadez-González A (2005) A study of the mechanical properties of short natural-fiber reinforced composites. Compos B Eng 36:597–608CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Yu L, Dean K, Li L (2006) Polymer blends and composite from renewable resources. Prog Polym Sci 31:576–602CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Davies GC, Bruce DM (1998) Effect of environmental relative humidity and damage on the tensile properties of flax and nettle fibers. Text Res J 68(9):623–629CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Gassan J, Bledzki AK (2001) Thermal degradation of flax and jute fibers. J Appl Polym Sci 82(6):1417–1422CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Atuanya CU, Ebunoha EO, Isaac GO, Aigbodion VS (2013) Characterization of the thermo-mechanical behavior of Momordica angustisepala fibers intended for the manufacturing of polymer composites. Pac J Sci Technol 14(2):40–47Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Monroe EA (1979) Ceramic biomaterials N.Y. State Coll. ceramics. Bi-mon Rep 14–3(2):28Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Jarcho M (1981) Calcium phosphate ceramics as heat tissue prasthetics. Clin Orthop 157:259–278Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Golutvina MM, Semochkina LS, Glegoley AN, Osanov DP (1973) Comparative study of synthetic and bone hydroxylapatites. Boil Nauki 16:51–56Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Scheicher H (1978) Hydroxylapatite-containing compositions. Ger Offe 2,840,064 (CI. C047100)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The National Academy of Sciences, India 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  • A. D. Omah
    • 1
  • E. C. Omah
    • 2
  • V. S. Aigbodion
    • 1
    Email author
  • I. C. Ezema
    • 1
  • P. O. Offor
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Metallurgical and Materials EngineeringUniversity of Nigeria, NsukkaNsukkaNigeria
  2. 2.Department of Food Science and TechnologyUniversity of Nigeria, NsukkaNsukkaNigeria

Personalised recommendations