Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Soil Physical Quality as Affected by Management Practices Under Maize–Wheat System

  • Research Article
  • Published:
National Academy Science Letters Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Soil physical quality is one of the three important aspects of soil quality, besides biological and chemical quality. Decline in soil physical quality can have serious consequences on biological and chemical properties thereby making it relevant to study soil physical quality for maintaining soil health in long run. Changes in this property of soil affect the productivity of crops. In this investigation, Dexter S theory has been applied to evaluate the soil physical quality in maize–wheat system under two tillage/land configurations namely raised bed planting (BP) and conventional tillage (CT) and nine nutrient treatments viz (1) T1—control (crop without fertilizer), (2) T2—100 % recommended dose of nitrogen (N), phosphorous (P) and potassium (K), (3) T3—100 % NPK (25 % N substituted by farmyard manure (FYM)), (4) T4—100 % NPK + green manure (Sesbania), (5) T5—100 % NPK (25 % N substituted by biofertilizer), (6) T6—100 % NPK (25 % N substituted by sewage sludge), (7) T7—100 % NPK + crop residue incorporated (from previous crop), (8) T8—100 % organic source (50 % FYM + 25 % bio-fertilizer + 25 % crop residue), and (9) T9—no crop no fertilizer; were identified for this study. BP significantly improved the soil physical quality compared to CT. Within nutrient treatments, S index was highest in T8 followed by the T5, whereas lowest in T1. There is high and significant correlation between S index and soil physical parameter and crop yield which shows that S index can be used effectively for quantifying soil physical quality under diverse environments vis-à-vis crop yield.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Silva AP, Kay BD (1996) The sensitivity of shoot growth of corn to the least limiting water range of soils. Plant Soil 184:323–329

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Drury CF, Zhang TQ, Kay BD (2003) The non-limiting and least limiting water range for soil nitrogen mineralization. Soil Sci Soc Am J 67:1388–1404

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Allmaras RR, Fritz VA, Pfleger FL, Copeland SM (2002) Impaired internal drainage and Aphanomyces euteiches root rot of pea caused by soil compaction in a fine-textured soil. Soil Tillage Res 1740:1–12

    Google Scholar 

  4. Dexter AR (2004) Soil physical quality. Part I. Theory, effects of soil texture, density and organic matter, and effects on root growth. Geoderma 120:201–214

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Dexter AR (2004a) Soil physical quality. Part II. Friability, tillage, tilth and hard-setting. Geoderma 120:215–225

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Dexter AR (2004b) Soil physical quality. Part III. Unsaturated hydraulic conductivity and general conclusions about S-theory. Geoderma 120:227–239

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Yadav RL and Subba Rao AVM (2001) Atlas of cropping systems of India. PDCSR Bulletin Project Directorate of Cropping Systems Research, Modhopuram, Meerut, India No. 2001–2

  8. Sidhu HS, Singh S, Singh T, Ahuja SS (2004) Optimization of energy usage in different crop production systems. J Inst Eng 85:1–4

    Google Scholar 

  9. Hobbs PR (2001) Tillage and crop establishment in South Asian rice–wheat system: present practices and future options. J Crop Prod 4:1–22

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Painuli DK, Tomar SS, Tembe GP, Sharma SK (2002) Raised-sunken bed technology for rainfed vertisols of high rainfall areas. In: AICRP on soil physical constraints and their amelioration for sustainable crop production. IISS, Bhopal, p 19

    Google Scholar 

  11. Connor DJ, Timsina J, Humphreys (2003) Prospects for permanent beds for the rice–wheat system. Improving the productivity and sustainability of rice–wheat systems: issue and impact, vol 65. American Society of Agronomy Special Publication, Wisconsin, pp 197–210

    Google Scholar 

  12. Jat ML, Srivastva A, Sharma SK, Gupta RK, Zaidi PH, Srinivasan G (2005) Evaluation of maize–wheat cropping system under double-no-till practice in Indo-Gangetic plains of India. Paper presented in the 9th Asian regional maize workshop, Beijing, China, 6–9 September 2005

  13. Ram H, Singh Y, Saini KS, Kler DS, Timsina J, Humphreys J (2012) Agronomic and economic evaluation of permanent raised beds, no tillage and straw mulching for an irrigated maize–wheat system in northwest India. Exp Agric 48:21–38

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Letey J (1985) Relationship between soil physical properties and crop production. Adv Soil Sci 1:277–294

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. De Silva AP, Kay BD, Perfect E (1994) Factors influencing least limiting water range of soils. Soil Sci Soc Am J 58:1775–1781

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Singh KK, Colvin TS (1992) Tilth index and crop yield. ASAE paper no. 92–1023. ASAE, St. Joseph

  17. Tormena CA, Da Silva ÁP, Imhoff SDC, Dexter AR (2008) Quantification of the soil physical quality of a tropical oxisol using the S index. Sci Agric (Piracicaba, Braz.) 65:56–60

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Chakraborty D, Garg RN, Tomar RK, Dwivedi BS, Aggarwal P, Singh R, Behera UK, Thangasamy A, Singh D (2010) Soil physical quality as influenced by long-term application of fertilizers and manure under maize–wheat system. Soil Sci 175:128–136

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Kutlu T, Ersahin S (2008) Evaluation of soil physical quality in mollic ustifluvent, typic ustifluvent and typic ustorthent using Dexter’s S-theory. J Food Agric Environ 6:450–455

    Google Scholar 

  20. van Genuchten MTH (1980) A closed-form equation for predicting the hydraulic conductivity of unsaturated soils. Soil Sci Soc Am J 44:892–898

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Mualem Y (1986) Hydraulic conductivity of unsaturated soils: prediction and formulas. In: Klute A (ed) Methods of soil analysis: part 1. physical and mineralogical methods, 2nd edn. American Society of Agronomy Monograph, Madison, WI, pp 799–823

    Google Scholar 

  22. Zhang X, Li Ma, Gilliam FS, Wang Q, Li C (2012) Effects of raised-bed planting for enhanced summer maize yield on rhizosphere soil microbial functional groups and enzyme activity in Henan Province, China. Field Crop Res 130:28–37

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Patino-Zúniga L, Ceja-Navarro JA, Govaerts B, Luna-Guid M, Sayre KD, Dendooven L (2009) The effect of different tillage and residue management practices on soil characteristics, inorganic N dynamics and emissions of nitrous oxide, carbon dioxide and methane in the central highlands of Mexico: a laboratory study. Plant Soil 314:231–241

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Benbi DK, Biswas CR, Bawa SS, Kumar K (1998) Influence of farmyard manure, inorganic fertilizers and weed control practices on some soil physical properties in a long-term experiment. Soil Use Manag 14:52–54

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Nimmo JR (2004) porosity and pore size distribution. In: Hillel D (ed) Encyclopedia of soils in the environment, vol 3. Elsevier, London, pp 295–303

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  26. Bavel Van (1950) Mean weight-diameter of soil aggregates as a statistical index of aggregation. Proceedings Soil Sci Soc Am J 14:20–23

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Fernandes JC, Gamero CA, Rodrigues JGL, Miras-Avalos JM (2011) Determination of quality index of a Paleudult under sunflower culture and different management systems. Soil Tillage Res 112:167–174

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Mohanty M, Painuli DK, Misra AK, Ghosh PK (2007) Soil quality effects of tillage and residue under rice–wheat cropping on a Vertisol in India. Soil Tillage Res 92:243–250

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Division of Soil Physics, Indian Institute of Soil Science (IISS), Nabibagh, Berasia Road, Bhopal, 462038, Madhya Pradesh, India

    Nishant K. Sinha, M. Mohanty, J. Somasundaram & R. S. Chaudhary

  2. Division of Agricultural Physics, IARI, New Delhi, 110012, India

    Usha K. Chopra

  3. RVSKVV, Gwalior, Madhya Pradesh, India

    Anil K. Singh

Authors
  1. Nishant K. Sinha
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Usha K. Chopra
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Anil K. Singh
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. M. Mohanty
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. J. Somasundaram
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. R. S. Chaudhary
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Nishant K. Sinha.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Sinha, N.K., Chopra, U.K., Singh, A.K. et al. Soil Physical Quality as Affected by Management Practices Under Maize–Wheat System. Natl. Acad. Sci. Lett. 37, 13–18 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40009-013-0194-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40009-013-0194-3

Keywords

Search

Navigation