Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

The effect of pharmaceutical properties on the acid neutralizing capacity of antacid oral suspensions

  • Research Article
  • Published:
Journal of Pharmaceutical Investigation Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Acid neutralizing capacity (ANC) of antacids is an important indicator of the efficacy of such products. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the effect of pharmaceutical properties on the ANC of antacid oral suspensions. Fifteen antacid oral suspensions randomly sourced from different manufacturers and coded A1-A15 were assessed using ANC, raft formation, sedimentation profiles, ease of re-dispersibility, density, alkalinity, particle size, viscosity and rheological patterns. The effects of the pharmaceutical properties were discussed on the ANC and conclusions drawn. The results showed that ten (66.67 %) of the samples passed the ANC test among which 5 (83.33 %) were non-sedimenting highly viscous suspensions. One sample (A5) presented raft formation. Sedimentation volume reduces with time, ease of re-dispersibility was in seconds and the density range for all samples was 1.06–1.26 g/mL. The particle sizes of the antacid oral suspensions were within the range for coarse dispersions. The viscosity values ranged from 39.33 ± 1.53 to 2508 ± 24.33 cp. The rheogram of A3 shows a Newtonian flow with a regression coefficient of 0.999 and it had the least ANC. Other samples present non-Newtonian flow in a pseudoplastic pattern. Comparison of the viscosity of samples with ANC shows no direct relationship between the two variables although most samples with low viscosity failed the ANC test. The acid neutralizing capacity of the antacid oral suspensions is influenced by the dynamics of different parameters including type of active pharmaceutical ingredient, sedimentation profile, viscosity and overall rheology of the suspension.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Ajala TO, Oreagba MI, Odeku OA (2014) The pharmaceutical equivalence and stability of multisource metronidazole suspensions. Afr J Med Med Sci 43:139–148

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ansel HC, Allen LV, Popovich NG (eds) (1999) Pharmaceutical dosage forms and drug delivery systems, 7th edn. Lippincott Williams and Wilkins, Philadelphia, 64–67, 347–348

  • Ashford M (2002) Bioavailability—physicochemical and dosage form factors. In Aulton ME (ed) Pharmaceutics. The science of dosage form design, 2nd edn. Churchill Livingstone, Edinburgh, pp 244–245

  • Billany MR (1998) Suspensions and emulsions. In: Aulton ME (ed) Pharmaceutics: the science of dosage form design, 2nd edn. Churchill Livingstone, London, pp 334–358

    Google Scholar 

  • British Pharmacopoea (2005). H.M.S.O. London vol III CD

  • British Pharmacopoeia (2012) Volume III: formulated preparations: specific monographs, compound alginate antacid oral suspension, p 21

  • Brown LF, Wilson DE (1999) Gastro-duodenal ulcers: causes, diagnosis, prevention and treatment. Compr Ther 25(1):30–38

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • DeVault KR, Castell DO (2005) Updated guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of gastroesophageal reflux disease. Am J Gastroenterol 100:190–200

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Dimaline R, Varro A (2007) Attack and defence in the gastric epithelium-a delicate balance. Exp Physiol 92(4):591–601

  • Inadomi JE, Pandolfi JE, Sabesin SM (2007) Update on the diagnostic evaluation and medical management of reflux esophagitis. Gastroenterol Hepatol 10(suppl 30):4–12

    Google Scholar 

  • Kumar P, Clark M (2000) Peptic ulcer disease: Gastrointestinal disease. In: Clinical medicine, vol 6, 5th edn. Elsevier Saunders, London pp 272–273

  • Kumar S, Gupta SK (2012) Natural polymers, gums and mucilages as excipients in drug delivery. Polym Med 42(3–4):191–197

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Leong RW (2009) Differences in peptic ulcer between the East and the West. Gastroenterol Clin N Am 38(2):363–379

  • Liebow C (2006) The stomach’s work. In: Stomach. Accessed 4 April 2014, from World Book Online Reference Center database: http://www.worldbookonline.com/wb/Article?id=ar534380&st=antacid

  • Mandel KG, Daggy BP, Brodie DA (2000) Review article: alginate-raft formulations in the treatment of heartburn an acid reflux. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 14(6):669–690

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Martin A (2001) Suspensions. In: Physical pharmacy. 4th edn, Lippincott William & Wilkins, Baltimore, pp 480–481

  • Miskovitz PMD, Betancourt M (2005) Treating reflux disease. In: The doctor’s guide to gastrointestinal health: preventing and treating acid reflux, ulcers, irritable bowel syndrome, diverticulitis, celiac disease, colon cancer, pancreatitis, cirrhosis, hernias and more, Wiley, Hoboken, p 55

  • Moayyedi P, Talley NJ (2006) Gastroesophageal reflux disease. Lancet 367:2086–2100

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Mycek MJ, Harvey RA, Champe PC (2000) Gastrointestinal and antiemetic drugs. In: Harvey RA, Champe PC (eds) Lippincott’s illustrated reviews: pharmacology, 2nd edn. Lippincott William and Wilkin, Philadelphia, pp 235–246

    Google Scholar 

  • Nguyen L, Birk J (2009) Current and prospective pharmacotherapies in gastroesophageal reflux disease. Clin Med 2009(1):983–997

    Google Scholar 

  • Soll AH (1996) Medical treatment of peptic ulcer disease: practice guidelines. J Am Med Assoc 275:622–629

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Swarbrick J, Rubino JT, Rubino OP (2000) Coarse dispersions. In: Gennaro AR (ed) Remington: the science and practice of pharmacy, 20th edn. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Pennsylvania, pp 317–322

    Google Scholar 

  • Tulassay Z, Herszényi L (2010) Gastric mucosal defense and cytoprotection. Best Pract Res Clin Gastroenterol 24(2):99–108

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Walker P, Wood E (2003) The temporary storage tank. In: The digestive system. Lucent Books, Farmington Mills, pp15–16

  • Wilson JD (1992) Disorders of the gastrointestinal system: Peptic ulcer and gastritis. Harrison’s Principles of Internal Medicine, vol 9, 12th edn. The Mcgraw Hill Companies, Medical Publishing Division, London, pp 1222–1248

    Google Scholar 

  • Yoshida CM, Kotz D (2004) Try an over-the-counter heartburn remedy. In: No more digestive problems. Bantam Books, New York, pp 105–106, 214

  • Yuan Y, Padol IT, Hunt RH (2006) Peptic ulcer disease today. Nat Clin Pract Gastroenterol Hepatol 3(2):80–89

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This article does not contain any studies with human and animal subjects performed by any of the authors. And all authors (T.O. Ajala, B.O. Silva) declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Tolulope O. Ajala.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Ajala, T.O., Silva, B.O. The effect of pharmaceutical properties on the acid neutralizing capacity of antacid oral suspensions. Journal of Pharmaceutical Investigation 45, 433–439 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40005-015-0188-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40005-015-0188-x

Keywords

Navigation