Advertisement

Journal of Pharmaceutical Investigation

, Volume 45, Issue 1, pp 13–22 | Cite as

Development of simvastatin electrospun fibers: a novel approach for sustained drug delivery

  • Sudheer BethaEmail author
  • B. Pamula Reddy
  • M. Mohan Varma
  • D. Basava Raju
  • Venkata Ramana Murthy Kolapalli
Research Article

Abstract

In the present investigation simvastatin electrospun fibers were developed using electrospinning apparatus with drug–polymer w/w ratios of 1:1, 1:2, 1:3 and 1:4. Also solid mixtures were prepared with same ratios by employing kneading technique as conventional approach for comparison in drug release rate. Polyethylene oxide WSR coagulant 301, a hydrophilic matrix forming polymer, was used as carrier for sustained release of simvastatin. The ability of polyethylene oxide to control the drug release rate in both the formulations was also investigated. Studies were performed to characterize the optimized dosage form. Drug was crystalline in pure form. SEM surface morphology studies as well as powder X-ray diffractometry studies to developed fibers reveals that the crystalline drug was converted into amorphous form after fiber development. No physical incompatibility was found in FTIR and DSC studies of pure drug and physical mixture of drug, polymer. In vitro studies were performed in sodium phosphate buffer (pH 7.0) containing 0.5 % SLS. Simvastatin release was sustained over a period of 12 h in electrospinning fibers developed with drug to polymer w/w ratio 1:4 and 98.86 ± 0.42 % drug release was observed, interestingly with the same ratio there was a burst release of drug was obtained in case of solid mixtures “within span of 1 h”. Polyethylene oxide showed vast difference in drug release rate due to the techniques chosen to prepare formulations. The stability studies were also performed to the optimized product and no significant variance was observed in all the evaluation parameters. From the various mathematical models the drug release kinetics was estimated and found that the drug release followed zero order release rate kinetics with non fickian process as drug release mechanism.

Keywords

Simvastatin fibers Electrospinning process Polyethylene oxide Solid mixtures Kneading method 

Notes

Acknowledgments

This article dose not contain any studies with human and animal subjects performed by any of the authors. All authors (S. Betha, B. P. Reddy, M. M. Varma, D. B. Raju, and V. R. M. Kolapalli) declare that they have no conflict of interest. The authors are very much thankful to Biocon Ltd, for providing Simvastatin as gift sample.

Conflict of interest

The authors report no conflicts of interest. The authors alone are responsible for the content and writing of the paper.

References

  1. Andrady AL (2008) Science and technology of polymer nanofibers. Wiley, New York, pp 81–96CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Baumgarten P (1971) Electrostatic spinning of acrylic microfibers. J Colloid Interface Sci 36(1):71–79. doi: 10.1016/0021-9797(71)90241-4 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Berkland C, Pack DW, Kim KK (2004) Controlling surface nano-structure using flow-limited field-injection electrostatic spraying (FFESS) of poly(D, Llactide-co-glycolide). Biomaterials 25(25):5649–5658. doi: 10.1016/S0142-9612(04)00054-7 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Brannon LP (1990) Preparation and characterization of crosslinked hydrophilic networks. In: Brannon-Peppas L, Harland RS (eds) Absorbent polymer technology. Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp 45–66CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Buchko CJ, Chen LC, Shen Y, Martin DC (1999) Processing and microstructural characterization of porous biocompatible protein polymer thin films. Polymer 40(26):7397–7407. doi: 10.1016/S0032-3861(98)00866-0 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Colombo P, Bettini R, Santi P, Peppas NA (2000) Swellable matrices for controlled drug delivery: gel-layer behaviour, mechanisms and optimal performance. Pharm Sci Technol Today 3(6):198–204CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Deitzel JM, Kleinmeyer J, Harris D, Tan NCB (2001) The effect of processing variables on the morphology of electrospun nanofibers and textiles. Polymer 42(1):261–272. doi: 10.1016/S0032-3861(00)00250-0 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Deng-Guang Y, Li-Min Z, White K, Branford-White C (2009) Electrospun nano fiber based drug delivery systems. Health 1(2):67–75. doi: 10.4236/health.2009.12012 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Dhawan S, Dhawan K, Varma M, Sinha VR (2005) Applications of polyethylene oxide in drug delivery systems—Part II. Pharm Technol 29:82–96Google Scholar
  10. Doshi J, Reneker DH (1995) Electrospinning process and applications of electrospun fibers. J Electrost 35(2–3):151–160. doi: 10.1016/0304-3886(95)00041-8 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Flory PJ (1953) Principles of polymer chemistry. Cornell University Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  12. Halliday AJ, Moulton SE, Wallace GG, Cook MJ (2012) Novel methods of antiepileptic drug delivery polymer-based implants. Adv Drug Deliv Rev 64:953–964. doi: 10.1016/j.addr.2012.04.004 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Higuchi T (1963) Mechanism of sustained action medication theoretical analysis of rate of release of solid matrices. J Pharm Sci 51:1145–1149. doi: 10.1002/jps.2600521210 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Larrondo L, Manley RSJ (1981) Electrostatic fiber spinning from polymer melts. I. Experimental observations on fiber formation and properties. J Polym Sci Polym Phys Ed 19:909–920. doi: 10.1002/pol.1981.180190601 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. McClelland CA, Stubbs RJ, Fix JA, Pogany SA, Zentner GM (1991) Enhancement of 3-hydroxy-3-methyl-glutaryl-coenzyme A (HMG-CoA) reductage inhibitor efficacy through administration of a controlled osmotic pump dosage form. Pharm Res 8(7):873–876. doi: 10.1023/A:1015899328105 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Megelski S, Stephens JS, Chase DB, Rabolt JF (2002) Micro- and nanostructured surface morphology on electrospun polymer fibers. Macromolecules 35(22):8456–8466. doi: 10.1021/ma020444a CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Meinel AJ, Germershaus O, Luhmann T, Merkle HP, Meinel L (2012) Electrospun matrices for localized drug delivery: current technologies and selected biomedical applications. Eur J Pharm Biopharm 81:1–13. doi: 10.1016/j.ejpb.2012.01.016 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Moghe AK, Gupta BS (2008) Co-axial electrospinning for nanofiber structures: preparation and applications. Polym Rev 48:353–377. doi: 10.1080/15583720802022257 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Peppas NA (1985) Analysis of Fickian and Non-Fickian drug release from polymers. Pharma Acta Helv 60:110–111Google Scholar
  20. Pham AT, Lee PI (1994) Probing the mechanisms of drug release from hydroxypropylmethyl cellulose matrices. Pharm Res 11(10):1379–1384. doi: 10.1023/A:1018975318805 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Pham QP, Sharma U, Mikos AG (2006) Electrospinning of polymeric nanofibers for tissue engineering applications: a review. Tissue Eng 12:1197–1211. doi: 10.1089/ten.2006.12.1197 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Reneker DH, Yarin AL (2000) Bending instability of electrically charged liquid jets of polymer solutions in electrospinning. J Appl Phys 87(9):4531–4547. doi: 10.1063/1.373532 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Reyderman L, Stavchansky S (1995) Electrostatic spraying and its use in drug-delivery-cholesterol microspheres. Int J Pharm 124:75–85. doi: 10.1016/0378-5173(95)00078-W CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Robinson JR, Lee VHL (1987) Controlled drug delivery: fundamentals and applications. 2nd edn. 390. DekkerGoogle Scholar
  25. Shen X, Dengguang Y, Zhu L, Branford-White C, White K, Chatterton NP (2011) Electrospun diclofenac sodium loaded Eudragit® L 100-55 nanofibers for colon-targeted drug delivery. Int J Pharm 408:200–207. doi: 10.1016/j.ijpharm.2011.01.058 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Siepmanna J, Peppas NA (2001) Modeling of drug release from delivery systems based on hydroxypropyl methylcellulose (HPMC). Adv Drug Deliv Rev 48:139–157. doi: 10.1016/S0169-409X(01)00112-0 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Sill TJ, Von Recum HA (2008) Electrospinning: applications in drug delivery and tissue engineering. Biomaterials 29:1989–2006. doi: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2008.01.011 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. Taylor GI (1964) Electrically driven jets. Proc R Soc Lond 313A:453. doi: 10.1098/rspa.1969.0205 Google Scholar
  29. Verreck G, Chun I, Peeters J, Rosenblatt J, Brewster ME (2003) Preparation and characterization of nanofibers containing amorphous drug dispersions generated by electrostatic spinning. Pharm Res 20(5):810–817. doi: 10.1023/A:1023450006281 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Korean Society of Pharmaceutical Sciences and Technology 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  • Sudheer Betha
    • 1
    • 2
    Email author
  • B. Pamula Reddy
    • 1
  • M. Mohan Varma
    • 1
  • D. Basava Raju
    • 1
  • Venkata Ramana Murthy Kolapalli
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of Pharmaceutical TechnologyShri Vishnu College of PharmacyBhimavaramIndia
  2. 2.Department of Pharmaceutical Technology, AU College of Pharmaceutical SciencesAndhra UniversityVisakhapatnamIndia

Personalised recommendations