Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Sustainability Management Status of Agro-Ecosystems: A Case Study of Sugarcane Farmers in Shevgaon and Paithan (Sub-Districts) of Maharashtra, India

  • Full-Length Research Article
  • Published:
Agricultural Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Sugarcane is cash crop that demands various agricultural inputs like fertilizers, labor, etc. The study area is Shevgaon and Paithan sub-districts of Maharashtra, around Jayakwadi Dam on the Godavari River. The objectives of the present study are (1) to assess the sustainability of the Agroecosystem of the sugarcane cultivation in a local context with fewer resources available for study. (2) To identify and know the present status of activities that need to be improved for sustainable agriculture. Agroecological sustainability of sugarcane management practices conceptualized and operationalized using SALT (The sustainability assessment Adaptive and Low-input Tool). Overall, social and economic dimensions showed low values. Sub-indicators within social dimension like organized farmers, participation in decision making and level of trust in public institution were observed low. Most of other sub-indicators are of average values. Farmers training, self help groups, Group farming, subsidies for infrastructure and agricultural inputs, crushing of sugarcane residue, preservation of local seeds, use of locally made and organic fertilizers like vermicopost, biofertilizers can aid sustainable agriculture. Use of MIS,GIS,and IT can support good governance which will improve public trust and participation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. Farmers who cultivate sugarcane.

References

  1. Alkon M, Urpelainen J (2018) Trust in government and subsidy reform: evidence from a survey of Indian farmers. Stud Comp Int Dev. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12116-018-9266-1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Allen P, Van Dusen D, Lundy J, Gliessman S (1991) Integrating social, environmental, and economic issues in sustainable agriculture. Am J Altern Agric 6(1):34–39. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0889189300003787

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Altieri MA, Toledo VM (2011) The agroecological revolution in Latin America: rescuing nature, ensuring food sovereignty and empowering peasants. J Peasant Stud 38(3):587–612. https://doi.org/10.1080/03066150.2011.582947

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Ananda J, Crase L, Pagan PG (2006) A preliminary assessment of water institutions in India: an institutional design perspective. Rev Policy Res 23(4):927–953. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1541-1338.2006.00239.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Barbier EB (2017) The concept of sustainable economic development. Econ Sustain 14(2):87–96. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315240084-7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Bodin Ö, Crona BI (2009) The role of social networks in natural resource governance: What relational patterns make a difference? Glob Environ Chang 19(3):366–374. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2009.05.002

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Bos MG et al (2007) Quantifying the sustainability of agriculture. Irrig Drain Syst 21(1):1–15. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10795-006-9014-y

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Calleros-Islas A (2019) Sustainability assessment. An adaptive low-input tool applied to the management of agroecosystems in México. Ecol Indic 105:386–397. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2017.12.040

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Costanza R (2000) The dynamics of the ecological footprint concept. Ecol Econ 32(3):341–345. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0921-8009(99)00150-0

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Cristini H, Kauppinen-Räisänen H (2019) Managing the transformation of the global commons into luxuries for all. J Bus Res. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2019.12.002

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Dalgaard T, Hutchings NJ, Porter JR (2003) Agroecology, scaling and interdisciplinarity. Agric Ecosyst Environ 100(1–3):39–51. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0167-8809(03)00152-X

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Dominy CS, Haynes RJ, Van Antwerpen R (2002) Loss of soil organic matter and related soil properties under long-term sugarcane production on two contrasting soils. Biol Fertil Soils 36(5):350–356. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00374-002-0538-5

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Dwivedi BS, Singh VK, Meena MC (2017) Efficient nitrogen management under predominant cropping systems of India. Elsevier

    Book  Google Scholar 

  14. Farrell A, Hart M (1998) What does sustainability really mean?: The search for useful indicators. Environment 40(9):4–31. https://doi.org/10.1080/00139159809605096

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Frank JJ, Poulakos AG, Tornero-Velez R, Xue J (2019) Systematic review and meta-analyses of lead (Pb) concentrations in environmental media (soil, dust, water, food, and air) reported in the United States from 1996 to 2016. Sci Total Environ 694:133489. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.07.295

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Gaur A, Biggs TW, Gumma MK, Parthasaradhi G, Turral H (2008) Water scarcity effects on equitable water distribution and land use in a major irrigation project—case study in India. J Irrig Drain Eng 134(1):26–35. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9437(2008)134:1(26)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Glasgow RE, Chambers D (2012) developing robust, sustainable, implementation systems using rigorous, rapid and relevant science. Clin Transl Sci 5(1):48–55. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1752-8062.2011.00383.x

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  18. Government of Maharashtra (2020) District rainfall. National Informatics Centre, Ministry of Electronics & Information Technology, Government of India. https://ahmednagar.nic.in/about-district/rainfall/. Accessed 11 Mar 2020

  19. Hansen JW (1996) Is agricultural sustainability a useful concept? Agric Syst 50(2):117–143. https://doi.org/10.1016/0308-521X(95)00011-S

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Hayati D, Ranjbar Z, Karami E (2011) Biodiversity, biofuels, agroforestry and conservation agriculture. Biodivers, Biofuels, Agrofor, Conserv Agric 5:317–358. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-90-481-9513-8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Holling CS (2001) Understanding the complexity of economic, ecological, and social systems. Ecosystems 4(5):390–405. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10021-001-0101-5

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Ikerd JE (1993) The need for a system approach to sustainable agriculture. Agric Ecosyst Environ 46(1–4):147–160. https://doi.org/10.1016/0167-8809(93)90020-P

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Jadhav PB, Thokal RT, Mane MS, Bhange HN, Kale SR (2014) Conveyance efficiency improvement through canal lining and yield increment by adopting drip irrigation in command area. Int J Innov Res Sci Eng Technol 3(4):120–129

    Google Scholar 

  24. Kesavan PC, Swaminathan MS (2008) Strategies and models for agricultural sustainability in developing Asian countries. Philos Trans R Soc B Biol Sci 363(1492):877–891. https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2007.2189

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Lee D (2005) Agricultural sustainability and technology adoption: Issues and policies for developing countries. Issues Policies Dev Countries Am J Agric Econ 87(5):1325–1334

    Google Scholar 

  26. Lopez-Ridaura S, Masera O, Astier M (2000) Evaluating the sustainability of integrated peasantry systems the MESMIS framework. Ecol Indic 16(4):28–30

    Google Scholar 

  27. Lovell C, Mandondo A, Moriarty P (2018) The question of scale in integrated natural resource management author (s): Chris Lovell, Alois Mandondo and Patrick Moriarty. Ecol Soc. http://www.consecol.org/vol5/iss2/art25/

  28. Mali SC, Shrivastava PK, Thakare HS (2014) Impact of weather changes on sugarcane production. Res Environ Life Sci 7(4):4

    Google Scholar 

  29. McPeake J (2014) Electronic surveys: how to maximise success. McPeake, Joanne; Bateson, Meghan; O’Neill, Anna 21(3):24–26. https://doi.org/10.7748/nr2014.01.21.3.24.e1205

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Meadows D (1998) Indicators and information system for sustainable development. Hartland VT 05048

  31. Meyer JH, Van Antwerpen R, Meyer E (1996) A review of soil degradation and management research under intensive sugarcane cropping. Proc South Afr Sugar Technol Assoc 70(1960):22–28

    Google Scholar 

  32. Morse S, McNamara N, Acholo M (2008) Agricultural sustainability: comparing external and internal perspectives. J Sustain Agric 0046:37–41. https://doi.org/10.1300/J064v20n04

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Narayanamoorthy A (2013) Profitability in crops cultivation in India: some evidence from cost of cultivation survey data. Indian J Agric Econ 68(1):104–121

    Google Scholar 

  34. National B, Stewardship E (2005) 2005 environmental sustainability index [Online]. https://sedac.ciesin.columbia.edu/es/esi/ESI2005_Main_Report.pdf

  35. Joint Research Centre-European Commission (2008) Handbook on constructing composite indicators: methodology and user guide. OECD publishing

  36. Oliver MA, Bishop TFA, Marchant BP (2013) Precision agriculture for sustainability and environmental protection, vol 9780203128. Routledge, Abingdon

    Book  Google Scholar 

  37. Pickup G, Smith DMS (1993) Problems, prospects and procedures for assessing the sustainability of pastoral land management in arid Australia. J Biogeogr 20(5):471. https://doi.org/10.2307/2845721

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Pretty JN (1997) The sustainable intensification of agriculture. Nat Resour Forum 21(4):247–256. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1477-8947.1997.tb00699.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Rist S, Chidambaranathan M, Escobar C, Wiesmann U, Zimmermann A (2007) Moving from sustainable management to sustainable governance of natural resources: the role of social learning processes in rural India, Bolivia and Mali. J Rural Stud 23(1):23–37. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrurstud.2006.02.006

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Sajeev MV, Singha AK, Venkatasubramanian V (2012) training needs of farmers and rural youth: an analysis of Manipur State, India. J Agric Sci 3(2):103–112. https://doi.org/10.1080/09766898.2012.11884691

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Satpathy C (2013) Initiatives and challenges of good governance in India. Yojana, 51

  42. Sayer J et al (2013) Ten principles for a landscape approach to reconciling agriculture, conservation, and other competing land uses. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 110(21):8349–8356. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1210595110

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  43. Gough S, Scott W (2003) Sustainable development and learning: framing the issues. Routledge

  44. Van Selm M, Jankowski NW (2006) Conducting online surveys. Qual Quant 40(3):435–456. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11135-005-8081-8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Sileshi M, Kadigi R, Mutabazi K, Sieber S (2019) Determinants for adoption of physical soil and water conservation measures by smallholder farmers in Ethiopia. Int Soil Water Conserv Res 7(4):354–361. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iswcr.2019.08.002

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Speelman EN, López-Ridaura S, Colomer NA, Astier M, Masera OR (2007) Ten years of sustainability evaluation using the MESMIS framework: lessons learned from its application in 28 Latin American case studies. Int J Sustain Dev World Ecol 14(4):345–361. https://doi.org/10.1080/13504500709469735

    Article  Google Scholar 

  47. Srivastava P, Singh R, Tripathi S, Raghubanshi AS (2016) An urgent need for sustainable thinking in agriculture—an Indian scenario. Ecol Indic 67:611–622. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2016.03.015

    Article  Google Scholar 

  48. Thrupp LA (2000) Linking agricultural biodiversity and food security: the valuable role of sustainable agriculture Lori Ann Thrupp International Affairs [Online]. http://www.jstor.org/stable/2626366?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents

  49. Tyagi NK, Agrawal A, Sakthivadivel R, Ambast SK (2005) Water management decisions on small farms under scarce canal water supply: a case study from NW India. Agric Water Manag 77(1–3):180–195. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agwat.2004.09.031

    Article  Google Scholar 

  50. World Bank (2012) India: issues and priorities for agriculture. World Bank. https://www.worldbank.org/en/news/feature/2012/05/17/india-agriculture-issues-priorities

Download references

Acknowledgements

I am thankful of the Indian Institute of Forest Management, Bhopal, India, for its monthly fellowship as Fellow Program in Management to do this research work. I am also thankful to my FPM (PhD) supervisor, Dr. Omprakash Madguni for valuable guidance. Lastly, I thank farmers from the study area who responded to online survey and sugarcane factories, shops of agriculture inputs who provided list of farmers.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Rahul Wadghane.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary file1 (DOCX 20 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Wadghane, R. Sustainability Management Status of Agro-Ecosystems: A Case Study of Sugarcane Farmers in Shevgaon and Paithan (Sub-Districts) of Maharashtra, India. Agric Res 11, 737–746 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40003-022-00617-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40003-022-00617-8

Keywords

Navigation