Skip to main content
Log in

Geostatistical Assessment of Spatial Variability of Soil Organic Carbon Under Different Land Uses of Northwestern India

  • Full-Length Research Article
  • Published:
Agricultural Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Changes in land use over time can induce spatial variability and these spatial variability patterns may be land use specific. Blanket nutrient management strategies that disregard spatial variability, not only cause economic losses but can impair soil and environmental quality and crop productivity. Geostatistical tools help better in capturing spatial variability than classical tools. This present study was conducted in three different land uses viz., berseem-based, rice–wheat, and poplar-wheat cropping systems prevalent in the northwestern part of India. A total of 144 geo-referenced surface soil samples were collected from these land uses and analyzed chemically to determine SOC and other physicochemical parameters. The highest amount of SOC was associated with poplar-based system, signifying thereby considerable potential for carbon sequestration. The experimental semivariograms models were computed to find the best fitted model for characterizing the spatial pattern of SOC. Gaussian model was found as the best fit for describing the spatial structure of SOC under berseem-based land use; on the other hand, spherical and exponential models were found suitable for rice–wheat and poplar-wheat systems, respectively. The nugget:sill ratio (NS ratio) of SOC was 0.21 for poplar-wheat based land use, suggesting strong spatial dependence, whereas the other land uses exhibited moderate spatial dependence (Berseem based=0.65; Rice-wheat=0.35). Spatial variability maps of SOC were generated using ordinary kriging (OK) technique which helped identify management zones within a field.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

Explore related subjects

Discover the latest articles and news from researchers in related subjects, suggested using machine learning.

References

  1. Arévalo-Gardini E, Canto M, Alegre J, Loli O, Julca A, Baligar V (2015) Changes in soil physical and chemical properties in long term improved natural and traditional agroforestry management systems of cacao genotypes in peruvianamazon. PLoS ONE 10(7):132–147

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Behera SK, Shukla AK (2015) Spatial distribution of surface soil acidity, electrical conductivity, soil organic carbon content and exchangeable potassium, calcium and magnesium in some cropped acid soils of India. Land Degrad Dev 26:71–79

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Bhunia GS, Shit PK, Chattopadhyay R (2018) Assessment of spatial variability of soil properties using geostatistical approach of lateritic soil (West Bengal, India). Ann Agrar Sci 16:436–443

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Cambardella CA, Moorman TB, Novak JM, Parkin TB, Karlen DL, Turco RF, Konopka AE (1994) Field-scale variability of soil properties in Central Iowa soils. Soil Sci Soc Am J 58:1501–1511

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Goovaerts P (1998) Geostatistics in soil science: state-of-the-art and perspectives. Geoderma (in Press)

  6. Jackson ML (1973) Soil chemical analysis-advanced course: a manual of methods useful for instruction and research in soil chemistry, physical chemistry, soil fertility and soil genesis, 2nd edn. Madison

  7. Kumar S, Stohlgem TJ, Chong GW (2006) Spatial heterogeneity influences native and nonnative species richness. Ecology 87:3186–3199

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Lin H, Wheeler D, Bell J, Wilding L (2005) Assessment of soil spatial variability at multiple scales. Ecol Model 182:271–290

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Liu PZ, Shao AM, Wang YQ (2012) Large-scale spatial variability and distribution of soil organic carbon across the entire Loess Plateau, China. Soil Res 50:114–124

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Nair RP, Kumar MB, Nair VD (2009) Agroforestry as a strategy for carbon sequestration. J Plant Nutr Soil Sci 172(1):10–23

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Pang S, Li TX, Zhang XF, Wang YD, Yu HY (2011) Spatial variability of cropland lead and its influencing factors: a case study in Shuangliu county, Sichuan province, China. Geoderma 162:223–230

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Paul OO, Sekhon BS, Sharma S (2018) Spatial variability and simulation of soil organic carbon under different land use systems: geostatistical approach. Agrofor Syst 92:1–10

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Robinson GW (1922) A new method for the mechanical analysis of soils and other dispersions. J Agric Res 12:306–321

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Vasu D, Singh SK, Sahu N, Tiwary P, Chandran P, Duraisami VP, Ramamurthy V, Lalitha M, Kalaiselvi B (2017) Assessment of spatial variability of soil properties using geospatial techniques for farm level nutrient management. Soil Till Res 169:25–34

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Walkey A, Black IA (1934) An examination of the Degtjareff method for determining soil organic matter and a proposed modification of the chromic acid titration method. Soil Sci 37:29–37

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Wei JB, Xiao DN, Zeng H, Fu YK (2008) Spatial variability of soil properties in relation to land use and topography in a typical small watershed of the black soil region, northeastern China. Environ Geol 53:1663–1672

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Weller U, Castell WZ, Sommer M, Wehrhan M (2002) Kriging and interpolation with radial base functions a case study. http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/versions?doi=10.1.1.73.1305

  18. Wilding LP (1985) Spatial variability: its documentation, accommodation, and implication to soil surveys. In: Nielsen DR, Bouma J (eds) Soil spatial variability. Pudoc, Wageningen

    Google Scholar 

  19. Zhang XY, Sui YY, Zhang XD, Meng K, Herbert SJ (2007) Spatial variability of nutrient properties in black soil of northeast China. Pedosphere 17:19–29

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The first author gratefully acknowledges the financial help extended by Indian Council of Agricultural Research (ICAR) in the form of ICAR-Junior Research Fellowship during M.Sc. studies at Punjab Agricultural University, Ludhiana.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

BPM along with BSS planned, executed, and interpreted this research work. BPM wrote the manuscript and BSS finalized it. RKS did the geostatistical analysis of the soil parameters and RS assisted in laboratory analysis and helped in the preparation of the manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Bhabani Prasad Mondal.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

There are no potential conflicts of interest.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Mondal, B.P., Sekhon, B.S., Setia, R.K. et al. Geostatistical Assessment of Spatial Variability of Soil Organic Carbon Under Different Land Uses of Northwestern India. Agric Res 10, 407–416 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40003-020-00509-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40003-020-00509-9

Keywords