Skip to main content

Advertisement

Springer Nature Link
Log in

Production Constraints, Farmers’ Preferred Characteristics of Maize Varieties in the Bimodal Humid Forest Zone of Cameroon and Their Implications for Plant Breeding

  • Full-Length Research Article
  • Published:
Agricultural Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Many high-yielding improved maize varieties have been developed in Cameroon, though only a limited number of farmers have adopted them. A participatory rural appraisal consisting of focus group discussions and formal surveys was conducted in 140 households in six villages of the Central Region in the Bimodal Humid Forest Zone of Cameroon. The objective of this study was to identify constraints to maize production and farmers’ preferred maize characteristics which can be used as selection criteria by maize breeders to develop appropriate varieties as preferred by farmers. Results revealed that the most important constraints to maize production in the study area are unavailability and high cost of seeds of improved varieties (53.8%), low soil fertility (50.0%), lack of labor (48.0%), unavailability or high cost of fertilizers (41.2%), difficulty in weeding (38.9%) and post-harvest losses (31.0%). Farmers’ preferred characteristics in maize varieties were large grain size, soft grain texture, large ear size, high prolificacy, early maturity, short plants, resistance to lodging, resistance to diseases and reduced post-harvest losses. Based on these findings, there will be increased adoption of improved maize varieties if maize breeders address the identified constraints and take farmers ‘preferred traits into account while developing new varieties. Some farmers of the study area are interested in growing hybrids. Therefore, high-yielding maize hybrids with the identified traits and which are adapted to low soil fertility should be developed and promoted, hence increasing maize production. Breeders should collaborate with extensionists to ensure that varieties developed are grown with appropriate technical package for good results and high adoption.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

Explore related subjects

Discover the latest articles and news from researchers in related subjects, suggested using machine learning.

References

  1. Aquino PF, Carrion RC, Flores D (2001) Selected maize statistics. In: PL Pingali (ed) CIMMYT 1999–2000.World maize facts and trends. Meeting world maize needs: technological opportunities and priorities for the public sector. CIMMYT, Mexico, pp 45–57

  2. Aroga RR, Ambassa-kiki C, Thé LE, Ajala SO (2001) On farm evaluation of performance of selected improved maize varieties in the forest zone of Central Cameroon. In: Seventh Eastern and Southern Africa Regional Maize Conference, pp 432–437

  3. Asaah EK, Tchoundjeu Z, Leakey RB, Takousting B, Njong J, Edang I (2011) Trees, agroforestry and multifunctional agriculture in Cameroon. Int J Agric Sustain 9(1):110–119

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Banla EM, Dzidzienyo DK, Beatrice IE, Offei SK, Tongoona P, Desmae H (2018) Groundnut production constraints and farmers’ trait preferences: a pre-breeding study in Togo. J Ethnobiol Ethnomed 14:75. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13002-018-0275-y

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. Bänziger M, Diallo AO (2002)Stress tolerant maize for farmers in Sub-Saharan Africa. In: CIMMYT maize research highlights CIMMYT, Mexico, DF, pp 1–8

  6. Chambers R (1993) Challenging the professions: frontiers for rural development. Intermediate Technology Publications, London

    Book  Google Scholar 

  7. Chambers R (1994) Participatory rural appraisal (PRA): analysis of experience. World Dev 22(9):1253–1268

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Dao A, Sanou J, Gracen V, Danquah EY (2015) Indentifying farmers’ preferences and constraints to maize production in two agro-ecological zones in Burkina Faso. Agric Food Secur 4:13. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40066-015-0035-3

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Derera J (2005) Genetic effects and associations between grain yield potential, stress tolerance and yield stability in Southern African Maize (Zea mays L.) base germplasm. School of Biochemistry, Genetics, Microbiology and Plant Pathology, Faculty of Science and Agriculture, University of KwaZulu-Natal, Republic of South Africa, p 175

  10. Etoundi SMN, Dia KB (2008) Determinants of the adoption of improved varieties of maize in Cameroon: case of CMS 8704. Globalisation, institutions and african economic development. In: Proceedings of the African economic conference, 12–14 November 2008, Tunis, Tunisia, pp 397–413

  11. FSSRP (2011) Technical bulletin on the mineral fertilization of maize in zone III, IV and V. Fertilizer Sub-Sector Reform Program Yaounde, Cameroon

  12. IITA (2009) Maize. International Institute of Tropical Agriculture. http://old.iita.org/cms/details/maize_project_details.aspx?zoneid=63&articleid=273. Accessed 21 Aug 2014

  13. Islam MR, Salam MA, Bhuiyan MAR, Rahman MA, Gregorio GB (2008) Participatory variety selection for salt tolerance. Int J BioResour 4:21–25

    Google Scholar 

  14. Jon H, Mauricio RB, Sarah JH (2014) Maize landraces and adaptation to climate change in Mexico. J Crop Improv 28(4):484–501. https://doi.org/10.1080/15427528.2014.921800

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Joseph KM, Melis R, Laing M, Shanahan P, Derera J, Ngugi K, Migwa Y (2016) Farmers’ perceptions of production constraints and preferences in cassava grown in semi-arid areas of Kenya. Int J Curr Microbiol Appl Sci 5(3):844–859. https://doi.org/10.20546/ijcmas.2016.503.098

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Kafle B (2010) Determinants of adoption of improved maize varieties in developing countries: a review. Int Res J Appl Basic Sci 1:1–7

    Google Scholar 

  17. Kemajou E (2008) Impact de la domestication participative des arbres locaux sur les conditions de vie des populations locales: cas de la province du. Centre, Cameroun, Université de Dschang, Cameroun, Cameroun, p 87

    Google Scholar 

  18. Kenga RC, Thé C, Zonkeng C (2007) Combining ability in medium-maturity maize genotypes adapted to mid-altitude and lowland tropical environments. Cameroon J Agric Sci 3:9–16

    Google Scholar 

  19. Mala WA (2009) Knowledge systems and adaptive collaborative management of natural resources in southern Cameroon: decision analysis of agrobiodiversity for forest-agriculture innovations. Department of Forest and Wood Sciences, Faculty of AgriSciences, Stellenbosch University, p 238

  20. MINADER (2012) Carnet du poste agricole. Cameroon

  21. Miti F (2007) Breeding investigations of Maize (Zea mays L.) genotypes for tolerance to low nitrogen and drought in Zambia. University of Kwa-Zulu Natal, Pietermaritzburg, South Africa, p 196

  22. Moudingo E (2007) La situation des forêts au Cameroun. Wildlife Conservation Society, Douala, Cameroun

    Google Scholar 

  23. Ngo NF (2008) Analyse de la diversité des exploitations familiales à base de maïs dans le Centre et l’Ouest du Cameroun. PCP/REPARAC/IRAD, PRP OP Maïs, p 102

    Google Scholar 

  24. Ngo NF (2008) Durabilité des activités agricoles des exploitations familiales agricoles à base de maïs du Grand Sud Cameroun, 2èmes journées de recherches en sciences sociales. INRA SFER CIRAD, Lille, France

    Google Scholar 

  25. Ngoko Z, Cardwell KF, Marasas WFO, Wingfield MJ, Ndemah R, Shulthess F (2002) Biological and physical constraints on maize production in the humid forest and Western Highlands of Cameroon. Eur J Plant Pathol 108:893–902

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Ngonkeu ELM, Tandzi LN, Dickmi CV, Nartey E, Yeboah M, Ngeve J, Mafouasson HA, Kosgei A, Woin N, Gracen V (2017) Identification of farmer’s constraints to maize production in the humid forest zone of Cameroon. J Exp Agric Int 15(3):1–9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Nguimgo KAB, Balasubramanian V, Kaho F, Zeukeng P (2003) Maize-legume rotation and association for intensive maize production in the humid forest zone of Cameroon. In: Badu-Apraku B et al (eds) Maize revolution in West and Central Africa. Proceedings of a regional maize workshop, 14–18 May, 2001, IITA-Cotonou, Benin Republic. WECAMAN/IITA, pp 189–201

  28. Njessa B (2007) Impact du projet pipeline sur les populations riveraines du Centre Cameroun. Université de Dschang, Cameroun, p 58

    Google Scholar 

  29. Nkamleu GB (2004) L’échec de la croissance de la productivité agricole en Afrique Francophone. Economie Rurale 279:55–67

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Okali C, Sumberg J, Farrington J (1994) Farmer participatory research: rhetoric and reality. Intermediate Technology Publications, London

    Book  Google Scholar 

  31. Pingali PL (2012) Green Revolution: Impacts, limits, and the path ahead. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 109(31):12302–12308

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Reeves TG, Cassaday K (2002) History and past achievements of plant breeding. Aust J f Agric Res 53:851–863

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Sibiya J, Pangirayi T, Derera J, Makanda I (2013) Farmers’ desired traits and selection criteria for maize varieties and their implications for maize breeding: A case study from KwaZulu-Natal Province, South Africa. J Agric Rural Dev Trop Subtrop 114:39–49

    Google Scholar 

  34. Sperling L, Loevinsohn M, Ntabomvura B (1993) Rethinking the farmer’s role in plant breeding: local bean experts and on-situation selection in Rwanda. Exp Agric 29:509–515

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Sperling L, Ashby JA, Smith ME, Weltzien-R E, McGuire S (2001) A framework for analyzing participatory plant breeding approaches and results. Euphytica 122:439–450

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Tandzi NL, Ngonkeu EM, Nartey E, Yeboah M, Ngeve J, Mafouasson HA, Ngang AN, Bassi O, Gracen V (2015) Farmers’ adoption of improved maize varieties in the humid forest area of Cameroon. Int J Sci Eng Appl Sci (IJSEAS) 1(8):2395–3470

    Google Scholar 

  37. The C, Meka SS, Ngonkeu ELM, Bell JM, Mafouasson HA, Menkir A, Calba H, Zonkeng C, Atemkeng M, Horst WJ (2012) Maize grain yield response to changes in acid soil characteristics with yearly leguminous crop rotation, fallow, slash, burn and liming practices. Int J Plant Soil Sci 1:1–15

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Theis J, Grady H (1991) Participatory rapid appraisal for community development: a training manual based on experiences in the Middle East and North Africa. Save the Children and IIED, London

    Google Scholar 

  39. Witcombe JR, Joshi KD, Gyawali S, Musa AM, Johansen C, Virk DS, Sthapit BR (2005) Participatory plant breeding is better described as highly client-oriented plant breeding. I. Four indicators of client-orientation in plant breeding. Exp Agric 41(03):299–319

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. World Bank. Agriculture for development. World development report 2008, The World Bank, Washington DC, p 365

Download references

Acknowledgements

This study was supported by Alliance for Green Revolution in Africa (AGRA) through the West Africa Centre for Crop Improvement (WACCI), University of Ghana. The authors are thankful to IRAD for the research facilities, to the Sub-Divisional Officer and staff of MINADER at Okola and Mbalmayo for facilitating the PRA.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Institut de Recherche Agricole pour le Développement (IRAD), B. P. 2123, Yaoundé, Cameroon

    Hortense Noëlle Apala Mafouasson, Richard Kenga, Godswill Ntsomboh-Ntsefong, Liliane Ngoune Tandzi & Precillia Ijang Tata Ngome

  2. West Africa Centre for Crop Improvement (WACCI), College of Basic and Applied Sciences, University of Ghana, PMB 30, Legon, Accra, Ghana

    Vernon Gracen

Authors
  1. Hortense Noëlle Apala Mafouasson
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Richard Kenga
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Vernon Gracen
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Godswill Ntsomboh-Ntsefong
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Liliane Ngoune Tandzi
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Precillia Ijang Tata Ngome
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

All authors contributed to this study. HNAM contributed to study conception. RK and VG helped in study design and critical revision of the manuscript. HNAM carried out the study. GN-N, LNT and IPT contributed to data interpretation and manuscript writing. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Hortense Noëlle Apala Mafouasson.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Mafouasson, H.N.A., Kenga, R., Gracen, V. et al. Production Constraints, Farmers’ Preferred Characteristics of Maize Varieties in the Bimodal Humid Forest Zone of Cameroon and Their Implications for Plant Breeding. Agric Res 9, 497–507 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40003-020-00463-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40003-020-00463-6

Keywords