Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Path Loss Estimation for Wireless Underground Sensor Network in Agricultural Application

  • Brief Research Article
  • Published:
Agricultural Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Path loss models are used to estimate the path loss between transmitter and receiver in applications that involve transmission of electromagnetic waves. This paper describes the wireless underground sensor networks, which communicates within the soil and is different from the terrestrial wireless sensor network. An integrated study of electromagnetic waves propagation for a wireless underground sensor network is described in this paper. Here, path loss model and signal strength are presented, because of electromagnetic waves attenuation in the soil medium. Tests were conducted at various soil volumetric water contents and node deployment depths using three different frequencies, when soil consists of 0% sands, 35% silt and 15% clay. The results showed that radio signal path loss was minimum when frequency and moisture content are low. The experimental results revealed that a 20% increase in the soil moisture content increased the path loss by more than 30%.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Akyildiz IF, Stuntebeck EP (2006) Wireless underground sensor networks: research challenges. Ad Hoc Netw 4:669–686

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Akyildiz IF, Su W, Sankarasubramaniam Y, Cayirci E (2002) Wireless sensor networks: a survey. Comput Netw 38(4):393–422

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Akyildiz IF, Sun Z, Vuran MC (2009) Signal propagation techniques for wireless underground communication networks. Phys Commnu J 2(3):167–183

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Bogena HR, Huismana JA, Meierb H, Rosenbauma U, Weuthena A (2009) Hybrid wireless underground sensor networks: quantification of signal attenuation in soil. Vadose Zone J 8(3):755–761

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Daniels DJ (1996) Surface-penetrating radar. Electron Commun Eng J 8(4):165–182

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Harun A, Ndzi DL, Ramli MF, Shakaff AYM, Ahmad MN, Kamarudin LM, Ndzi DL, Kamarudin LM, Muhammad EAA, Zakaria A, Ahmad RB, Malek MFBA, Shakaff AYM, Jafaar MN (2012) Vegetation attenuation measurements and modeling in plantations for wireless sensor network planning. Prog Electromagn Res B 36:283–301

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Harun A, Ndzi DL, Ramli MF, Shakaff AYM, Ahmad MN, Kamarudin LM, Zakaria A, Yang Y (2012) Signal propagation in aquaculture environment for wireless sensor network applications. Prog Electromag Res 131:477–494

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Hunt KP, Niemeier JJ, Kruger A (2010) RF communications in underwater wireless sensor networks. In: IEEE international conference on electro/information technology (EIT), pp 1–6

  9. Li L (2008) Study on some key techniques in wireless underground sensor networks. Beijing University of Posts and Telecommunications, Beijing

    Google Scholar 

  10. Li L, Vuran MC, Akyildizy IF (2007) Characteristics of underground channel for wireless underground sensor networks. In: The sixth annual mediterranean ad hoc networking workshop, vol 6, pp 12–15

  11. Miller TW, Borchers B, Hendrickx JMH, Hong SH, Dekker LW, Ritsema CJ (2002) Effects of soil physical properties on GPR for landmine detection. In: Proceedings of the fifth international symposium on technology and the mine problem

  12. Ramo S, Whinnery J, Van DT (1994) Fields and water for communications electronics. Wiley, New York

    Google Scholar 

  13. Ritsema CJ, Kuipers H, Kleiboer L, Elsen E, Oostindie K, Wesseling JG, Wolthuis JW (2009) A new wireless underground network system for continuous monitoring of soil water contents. Water Resour Res 45(36):36–44

    Google Scholar 

  14. Sharma PK, Singh RK (2010) Comparative analysis of propagation path loss models with field measured data. Int J Eng Sci Technol 2(6):2008–2013

    Google Scholar 

  15. Silva AR, Vuran MC (2010) Integration of center pivot systems with wireless underground sensor networks for autonomous precision agriculture. In: IEEE international conference on cyber-physical systems, pp 79–88

  16. Silva AR, Vuran MC (2010) Communication with above devices in wireless underground sensor networks: a empirical study. In: 2010 IEEE international conference on communications, pp 23–27

  17. Stuber G (2001) Principles of mobile communication. Klumer, Dordrecht

    Google Scholar 

  18. Stuntebeck EP, Pompili D, Melodia T (2006) Wireless underground sensor networks using commodity terrestrial motes. IEEE, pp 112–114

  19. Sun Z, Akyildiz IF (2008) Channel modeling of wireless networks in tunnels. In: Proceedings of IEEE Globecom 2008, New Orleans, USA

  20. Tiusanen J (2005) Attenuation of a soil scout radio signal. Biosyst Eng 90(2):127–133

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Tiusanen J (2007) Validation and results of the soil scout radio signal attenuation model. Biosyst Eng 97(1):11–17

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Vuran MC, Akyildiz IF (2010) Channel model and analysis for wireless underground sensor networks in soil medium. Phys Commun 3(4):245–254

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Wait J (1985) Electromagnetic wave theory. Harper and Row, New York

    Google Scholar 

  24. Wait J, Fuller J (1971) On radio propagation through earth: antennas and propagation. IEEE Trans Antennas Propag 19(6):796–798

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Weldon TR, Rathore AY (1999) Wave propagation model and simulations for landmine detection. Technical report. University of N. Carolina at Charlotte

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors wish to thank the National Engineering Research Center for Water-Saving Irrigation, which partially supported this research through the “National Natural Science Funds of China (51509207)”. The authors are also grateful to the anonymous reviewers for their valuable feedback.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Northwest Agriculture and Forestry University, Yangling, 712100, Shaanxi, China

    Xiaoqing Yu, Wenting Han & Zenglin Zhang

Authors
  1. Xiaoqing Yu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Wenting Han
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Zenglin Zhang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Xiaoqing Yu.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Yu, X., Han, W. & Zhang, Z. Path Loss Estimation for Wireless Underground Sensor Network in Agricultural Application. Agric Res 6, 97–102 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40003-016-0239-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40003-016-0239-1

Keywords

Search

Navigation