Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Qualitative Land Suitability Evaluation by Parametric and Fuzzy Approaches for Sugar Beet Crop in Sabzevar Plain, Northeast of Iran

  • Full-Length Research Article
  • Published:
Agricultural Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Land evaluation is the process of predicting land-use potential on the basis of its attributes. In the present study, the qualitative land suitability evaluation by parametric and fuzzy approaches was investigated for sugar beet crop in Sabzevar plain, Northeast of Iran. Our results indicated that the most limiting factor for sugar beet cultivation in the study area is soil organic carbon. In both models, the suitability classes for sugar beet cultivation were classified into high (S1) in north parts of the plain to moderate suitable (S2) due to lower values of soil organic carbon in southwest and scattered part in the center of the plain. The values of land indexes by parametric and fuzzy logic approaches ranged from 60.55 and 50.50 in some parts in the center and south west to 84.95 and 83.20 in the northern parts of the plain, respectively. The coefficient of determination between the results obtained from both models was R 2 = 0.995, which shows a high correlation between the calculated land index values from two approaches. The correlation coefficient between the land index values and the observed sugar beet yield (R 2) varied between 0.86 and 0.94 by parametric and fuzzy approaches which verify the validation of both models in estimating land suitability for sugar beet production in the study area.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Bagherzadeh A, Mansouri Daneshvar MR (2011) Physical land suitability evaluation for specific cereal crops using GIS at Mashhad Plain, Northeast of Iran. Front Agric China 5(4):90–100

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Bagherzadeh A, Paymard P (2015) Assessment of land capability for different irrigation systems by parametric and fuzzy approaches in the Mashhad Plain, Northeast Iran. Soil Water Res 10(2):90–98

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Ball A, De la Rosa D (2006) Modelling possibilities for the assessment of soil systems. In Uphoff N, A

  4. Burrough PA (1989) Fuzzy mathematical methods for soil survey and land evaluation. J Soil Sci 40:477–492

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Burrough PA, MacMillan RA, Van Deursen W (1992) Fuzzy classification methods for determining land suitability from soil profile observations and topography. J Soil Sci 43:193–210

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Dent D, Young A (1981) Soil survey and land evaluation. George Allen and Uniwin, Boston

    Google Scholar 

  7. FAO (1976) A framework for land evaluation. FAO Soil Bulletin 32, Rome

  8. FAO (1983) Guidelines: land evaluation for rainfed agriculture. FAO Soils Bulletin, No. 52, FAO, Rome

  9. FAO (1984) Guidelines: land evaluation for rainfed agriculture. FAO Soils Bulletin 52, Rome

  10. FAO (1985) Guideline: land evaluation for irrigated agriculture. FAO Soils Bulletin, No. 55, Rome

  11. FAO (1993) Guideline for land use planning. FAO Development Series No: 1, FAO, Rome, p 96

  12. Held M, Imeson A, Montanarella L (2003) Economic interests and benefits of sustainable use of soils and land management. Joint Res. Centre Press, Ispra

    Google Scholar 

  13. Joss BN, Hall RJ, Sidders DM, Keddy TJ (2008) Fuzzy-logic modeling of land suitability for hybrid poplar across the Prairie Provinces of Canada. Earth Environ Sci 141:79–96

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Keshavarzi A, Sarmadian F (2009) Investigation of fuzzy set theory`s efficiency in land suitability assessment for irrigated wheat in Qazvin province using Analytic hierarchy process (AHP) and multivariate regression methods. In: Proceedings of ‘Pedometrics 2009’ conference, August 26–28, Beijing, China

  15. Kurtener D, Krueger-Shvetsova E, Dubitskaia I (2004) Quality estimation of data collection. UDMS. UDMS Press, Giorggia-Venice, pp 9101–9109

    Google Scholar 

  16. McBratney AB, Odeh IOA (1997) Application of fuzzy sets in soil science: fuzzy logic, fuzzy measurements and fuzzy decisions. Geoderma 77:85–113

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Nash JE, Sutcliffe JV (1970) River flow forecasting through conceptual models, part I: a discussion of principles. J Hydrol 10(3):282–290

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Sanchez JF (2007) Applicability of knowledge-based and fuzzy theory-oriented approaches to land suitability for upland rice and rubber. M.Sc. Thesis ITC, the Netherland

  19. Shahbazi F, Jafarzadeh AA, Sarmadian F, Neyshaboury MR, Oustan S, Anaya-Romero M, Lojo M, De la Rosa D (2009) Climate change impact on land capability using MicroLEIS DSS. Int Agrophys 23:277–286

    Google Scholar 

  20. Sicat RS, Carranza EJM, Nidumolu UB (2005) Fuzzy modeling of farmers’ knowledge for land suitability classification. Agric Syst 83:49–75

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Sys C (1985) Land evaluation, parts I, II, III. ITC Lecture Notes, University of Ghent, Belgium

    Google Scholar 

  22. Sys C, Van Ranst E, Debaveye IJ (1991) Land evaluation. Part II: methods in land evaluation. General Administration for Development Cooperation, Agricultural Publication No 7, Brussels, Belgium

  23. Sys C, Van Ranst E, Debaveye IJ (1991) Land evaluation. Part I: principles in land evaluation and crop production calculations. General Administration for Development Cooperation, Agricultural publication-No. 7, Brussels, Belgium

  24. Sys C, Van Ranst E, Debaveye IJ (1991) Land evaluation. Part II: methods in land evaluation. General Administration for Development Cooperation, Agricultural publication-No. 7, Brussels, Belgium

  25. Sys C, Van Ranst E, Debaveye IJ, Beernaert F (1993) Land evaluation. Part III: crop requirements. General Administration for Development Cooperation, Agricultural publication- No. 7, Brussels, Belgium

  26. Tang H, Debaveye J, Ruan D, Van Ranst E (1991) Land suitability classification based on fuzzy set theory. Pedologie 3:277–290

    Google Scholar 

  27. Tang H, Van Ranst E, Sys C (1992) An approach to predict land production potential for irrigated and rainfed winter wheat in Pinan County, China. Soil Technol 5:213–224

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Triantafilis J, Ward WT, McBratney AB (2001) Land suitability assessment in the Namoi Valley of Australia, using a continuous model. Amst J Soil Res 39:273–290

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Van Ranst E, Tang H, Groenemans R, Sinthurahat S (1996) Application of fuzzy logic to land suitability for rubber production in Peninsular Thailand. Geoderma 70:1–19

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Wang LX (1997) A course in fuzzy systems and control. Prentice Hall, New York

    Google Scholar 

  31. Zadeh LA (1965) Fuzzy sets. Inf Control 8:338–353

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We thank Islamic Azad University-Mashhad Branch for their support of the project. Thanks are also given to one anonymous reviewer for generous suggestions on data analyses and interpretations.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ali Bagherzadeh.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Bagherzadeh, A., Gholizadeh, A. Qualitative Land Suitability Evaluation by Parametric and Fuzzy Approaches for Sugar Beet Crop in Sabzevar Plain, Northeast of Iran. Agric Res 5, 277–284 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40003-016-0210-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40003-016-0210-1

Keywords

Navigation