Abstract
In recent years, there has been increased interest in agricultural production systems in order to achieve high productivity and promote sustainability over time. Hence, an experiment was conducted in order to evaluate the effects of intercropping systems on total yield, land equivalent ratio, and weed control efficiency (WCE). Pure standing of chickpea and barley, and intercropping systems of 100:25, 100:50, 100:75, 100:100, 25:75, 50:50, and 75:25 (chickpea:barley) were studied as randomized complete block design with three replications. Results indicated that weed density and biomass, grain yield, and index of WCE were affected significantly by intercropping systems. In comparison with control (sole cropping of chickpea with full infested), intercropping could decrease total weed density and biomass up to 66 and 90 %, respectively. The highest (89.9 %) and the lowest (49.2 %) values for WCE were achieved at 100:100 and 75:25 treatments, respectively. Moreover, in all treatments, LER was >1 which shows that intercropping has advantages. The highest value of LER (2.36) was achieved at 100:100 treatment. In general, chickpea–barley intercropping can suppress weeds and increase land-use efficiency.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Aasim M, Umer EM, Karim A (2008) Yield and competition indices of intercropping cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.) using different planting patterns. Tarim Bilimleri Dergisi 14(4):326–333
Agegnehu G, Ghizaw A, Sinebo W (2006) Yield performance and land use efficiency of barley and fababean mixed cropping in Ethiopian highlands. Eur J Agron 25:202–207
Altieri MA (1999) The ecological role of biodiversity in agroecosystems. Agric Ecosyst Environ 74:19–31
Banik P, Midya A, Sarkar BK, Ghose SS (2006) Wheat and chickpea intercropping systems in an additive series experiment: advantages and weed smothering. Eur J Agron 24:325–332
Den Hollander NG, Bastiaans L, Kropff MJ (2007) Clover as a cover crop for weed suppression in an intercropping design II. Competitive ability of several clover species. Eur J Agron 26:104–112
Dhima KV, Vasilakoglou IB, Eleftherohorinos IG, Lithourgidis AS (2006) Allelopathic potential of winter cereals and their cover crop mulch effects on grass weed suppression and corn development. Crop Sci 46:345–352
Evans LT (1998) Feeding the ten billion. Plants and population growth. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
Geren H, Avcioglu R, Soya H, Kir B (2008) Intercropping of corn with cowpea and bean: biomass yield and silage quality. Biotechnology 22:4100–4104
Gomes P, Gurevitch J (2005) Weed community responses in a corn-soybean intercrop. Opulus Press 1:281–288
Hauggaard-Nielsen H, Ambus P, Jensen ES (2001) Temporal and spatial distribution of roots and competition for nitrogen in pea-barley intercrops. Plant Soil 236:63–74
Hauggaard-Nielsen H, Andersen MK, Jornsgaard B, Jensen ES (2006) Density and relative frequency effects on competitive interactions and resource use in pea–barley intercrops. Field Crops Res 95:256–267
Hauggaard-Nielsen H, Gooding M, Ambus P, Corre-Hellou G, Crozat Y, Dahlmann C, Dibet A, Von Fragstein P, Pristeri A, Monti M, Jensen ES (2009) Pea–barley intercropping for efficient symbiotic N2-fixation, soil N acquisition and use of other nutrients in European organic cropping systems. Field Crops Res 113:64–71
Pandey IB, Bharati V, Mishra SS (2003) Effect of maize—based intercropping systems on maize yield and associated weeds under rainfed condition. Indian J Agron 48:30–33
Poggio BS (2005) Structure of weed communities occurring in monoculture and intercropping of field pea and barley. Agric Ecosyst Environ 109:48–58
Silva PSL, Oliveira OF, Silva PIB, Silva KMB, Braga JD (2009) Effect of cowpea intercropping on weed control and corn yield. Plant Danin 27:491–549
Singh RK, Singh SRK, Gautam US (2013) Weed control efficiency of herbicides in irrigated wheat (Triticum aestivum). Indian Res J Ext Edu 13(1):126–128
Vandermeer J (1993) The ecology of Intercropping. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
Willey RW (1979) Intercropping its importance and research needs. I. Competition and yield advantages. Field Crop Abst 32:1–10
Willey RW (1990) Recourse use in intercropping systems. Agric Water Manag 17:215–231
Willey RW, Rao MR (1980) A competitive ratio for quantifying competition between intercrops. Exp Agric 16:117–125
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Hamzei, J., Seyedi, M. Evaluation of the Effects of Intercropping Systems on Yield Performance, Land Equivalent Ratio, and Weed Control Efficiency. Agric Res 4, 202–207 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40003-015-0161-y
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40003-015-0161-y