Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Evaluation of the Effects of Intercropping Systems on Yield Performance, Land Equivalent Ratio, and Weed Control Efficiency

  • Full-Length Research Article
  • Published:
Agricultural Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In recent years, there has been increased interest in agricultural production systems in order to achieve high productivity and promote sustainability over time. Hence, an experiment was conducted in order to evaluate the effects of intercropping systems on total yield, land equivalent ratio, and weed control efficiency (WCE). Pure standing of chickpea and barley, and intercropping systems of 100:25, 100:50, 100:75, 100:100, 25:75, 50:50, and 75:25 (chickpea:barley) were studied as randomized complete block design with three replications. Results indicated that weed density and biomass, grain yield, and index of WCE were affected significantly by intercropping systems. In comparison with control (sole cropping of chickpea with full infested), intercropping could decrease total weed density and biomass up to 66 and 90 %, respectively. The highest (89.9 %) and the lowest (49.2 %) values for WCE were achieved at 100:100 and 75:25 treatments, respectively. Moreover, in all treatments, LER was >1 which shows that intercropping has advantages. The highest value of LER (2.36) was achieved at 100:100 treatment. In general, chickpea–barley intercropping can suppress weeds and increase land-use efficiency.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Aasim M, Umer EM, Karim A (2008) Yield and competition indices of intercropping cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.) using different planting patterns. Tarim Bilimleri Dergisi 14(4):326–333

    Google Scholar 

  2. Agegnehu G, Ghizaw A, Sinebo W (2006) Yield performance and land use efficiency of barley and fababean mixed cropping in Ethiopian highlands. Eur J Agron 25:202–207

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Altieri MA (1999) The ecological role of biodiversity in agroecosystems. Agric Ecosyst Environ 74:19–31

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Banik P, Midya A, Sarkar BK, Ghose SS (2006) Wheat and chickpea intercropping systems in an additive series experiment: advantages and weed smothering. Eur J Agron 24:325–332

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Den Hollander NG, Bastiaans L, Kropff MJ (2007) Clover as a cover crop for weed suppression in an intercropping design II. Competitive ability of several clover species. Eur J Agron 26:104–112

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Dhima KV, Vasilakoglou IB, Eleftherohorinos IG, Lithourgidis AS (2006) Allelopathic potential of winter cereals and their cover crop mulch effects on grass weed suppression and corn development. Crop Sci 46:345–352

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Evans LT (1998) Feeding the ten billion. Plants and population growth. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  8. Geren H, Avcioglu R, Soya H, Kir B (2008) Intercropping of corn with cowpea and bean: biomass yield and silage quality. Biotechnology 22:4100–4104

    Google Scholar 

  9. Gomes P, Gurevitch J (2005) Weed community responses in a corn-soybean intercrop. Opulus Press 1:281–288

    Google Scholar 

  10. Hauggaard-Nielsen H, Ambus P, Jensen ES (2001) Temporal and spatial distribution of roots and competition for nitrogen in pea-barley intercrops. Plant Soil 236:63–74

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Hauggaard-Nielsen H, Andersen MK, Jornsgaard B, Jensen ES (2006) Density and relative frequency effects on competitive interactions and resource use in pea–barley intercrops. Field Crops Res 95:256–267

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Hauggaard-Nielsen H, Gooding M, Ambus P, Corre-Hellou G, Crozat Y, Dahlmann C, Dibet A, Von Fragstein P, Pristeri A, Monti M, Jensen ES (2009) Pea–barley intercropping for efficient symbiotic N2-fixation, soil N acquisition and use of other nutrients in European organic cropping systems. Field Crops Res 113:64–71

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Pandey IB, Bharati V, Mishra SS (2003) Effect of maize—based intercropping systems on maize yield and associated weeds under rainfed condition. Indian J Agron 48:30–33

    Google Scholar 

  14. Poggio BS (2005) Structure of weed communities occurring in monoculture and intercropping of field pea and barley. Agric Ecosyst Environ 109:48–58

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Silva PSL, Oliveira OF, Silva PIB, Silva KMB, Braga JD (2009) Effect of cowpea intercropping on weed control and corn yield. Plant Danin 27:491–549

    Google Scholar 

  16. Singh RK, Singh SRK, Gautam US (2013) Weed control efficiency of herbicides in irrigated wheat (Triticum aestivum). Indian Res J Ext Edu 13(1):126–128

    Google Scholar 

  17. Vandermeer J (1993) The ecology of Intercropping. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  18. Willey RW (1979) Intercropping its importance and research needs. I. Competition and yield advantages. Field Crop Abst 32:1–10

    Google Scholar 

  19. Willey RW (1990) Recourse use in intercropping systems. Agric Water Manag 17:215–231

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Willey RW, Rao MR (1980) A competitive ratio for quantifying competition between intercrops. Exp Agric 16:117–125

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Javad Hamzei.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Hamzei, J., Seyedi, M. Evaluation of the Effects of Intercropping Systems on Yield Performance, Land Equivalent Ratio, and Weed Control Efficiency. Agric Res 4, 202–207 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40003-015-0161-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40003-015-0161-y

Keywords

Navigation