Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Beatmete Intensivpatienten

Bedarfsgesteuerte versus flache Sedierung bei Beatmung ohne signifikante Vorteile

  • Journalclub
  • Published:
Pneumo News Aims and scope

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Literatur:

  1. Kress JP, Pohlman AS, O'Connor MF, Hall JB. Daily interruption of sedative infusions in critically ill patients undergoing mechanical ventilation. N Engl J Med. 2000;342:1471-7

  2. Strøm T, Martinussen T, Toft P. A protocol of no sedation for critically ill patients receiving mechanical ventilation: a randomised trial. Lancet. 2010;375:475-80

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. ChA der Medizinischen Klinik III, Pettenkoferstr. 10, 83022, Rosenheim, Deutschland

    Stephan Budweiser

Authors
  1. Stephan Budweiser
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Stephan Budweiser.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Budweiser, S. Bedarfsgesteuerte versus flache Sedierung bei Beatmung ohne signifikante Vorteile. Pneumo News 12, 19–20 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s15033-020-1885-3

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s15033-020-1885-3

Search

Navigation