Literatur
Carrier M et al. Systematic review: case-fatality rates of recurrent venous thromboembolism and major bleeding events among patients treated for venous thromboembolism. Ann Intern Med 2010; 152: 578–589
Kearon C et al. Antithrombotic therapy for VTE disease: antithrombotic therapy and prevention of thrombosis, 9th ed: American College of Chest Physicians Evidence-Based Clinical Practice Guidelines. Chest 2012; 141: 419–94.
Stein PD et al. Impact of vena cava filters on in- hospital case fatality rate from pulmonary embolism. Am J Med 2012; 125: 478–84.
The PREPIC study group: Eight-year follow-up of patients with permanent vena cava filters in the prevention of pulmonary embolism: the PREPIC ( Prevention du Risque d Émbolie Pulmonaire par Interruption Cave) randomized study, Circulation 2005; 112: 416–22.
Literatur
Mismetti P, Laporte S, Pellerin O et al. Effect of a retrievable inferior vena cava filter plus anticoagulation vs anticoagulation alone on risk of recurrent pulmonary embolism: a randomized clinical trial. JAMA 2015; 313(16):1627–35.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Gutjahr, K. Kein Vorteil durch Vena-cava-Filter in Ergänzung zur Antikoagulation. Pneumo News 7, 32–33 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s15033-015-0225-5
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s15033-015-0225-5