Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Grenzwerte statt Korridore

Transatlantische Unterschiede bei den Hochdruckleitlinien

  • Fortbildung
  • Schwerpunkt Hypertonie
  • Published:
CardioVasc Aims and scope

Ein regelmäßig wiederkehrendes Ritual der letzten Jahrzehnte ist die Neubewertung der Blutdruckziele und Blutdrucktherapie. Die ersten Empfehlungen (JNC1) gab es Ende der 1970er-Jahre. 2017 und 2018 war es wieder soweit, die amerikanischen und europäischen Fachgesellschaften veröffentlichten ihre Hochdruckempfehlungen — mit unterschiedlichen Ergebnissen.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Literatur

  1. Williams B, Mancia G, Spiering W et al. 2018 ESC/ESH Guidelines for the management of arterial hypertension. Eur Heart J. 2018;39(33):3021–104

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Whelton PK, Carey RM, Aronow WS et al. 2017 ACC/AHA/AAPA/ABC/ACPM/AGS/APhA/ASH/ASPC/NMA/PCNA Guideline for the Prevention, Detection, Evaluation, and Management of High Blood Pressure in Adults: A Report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Clinical Practice Guidelines. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2018;71(19):e127–e248

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Chobanian AV, Bakris GL, Black HR et al. The Seventh Report of the Joint National Committee on Prevention, Detection, Evaluation, and Treatment of High Blood Pressure: the JNC 7 report. JAMA. 2003;289(19):2560–72

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. James PA, Oparil S, Carter BL et al. 2014 evidence-based guideline for the management of high blood pressure in adults: report from the panel members appointed to the Eighth Joint National Committee (JNC 8). JAMA. 2014;311(5):507–20

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Verdecchia P, Angeli F, Reboldi G. The SPRINT trial. J Am Soc Hypertens. 2015;9(10):750–3

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Mancia G, Fagard R, Narkiewicz K et al. 2013 ESH/ESC guidelines for the management of arterial hypertension: the Task Force for the Management of Arterial Hypertension of the European Society of Hypertension (ESH) and of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC). Eur Heart J. 2013;34(28):2159–219

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Bauer F, Seibert FS, Rohn B et al. Attended Versus Unattended Blood Pressure Measurement in a Real Life Setting. Hypertension. 2018;71(2):243–9

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. SPRINT Research Group, Wright JT Jr, Williamson JD, Whelton PK et al. A Randomized Trial of Intensive versus Standard Blood-Pressure Control. N Engl J Med. 2015;373(22):2103–16

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Textor SC, Schwartz GL. BP Targets in CKD, Mortality, and SPRINT: What Have We Learned? J Am Soc Nephrol. 2017;28(9):2561–3

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Huang C, Dhruva SS, Coppi AC et al. Systolic Blood Pressure Response in SPRINT (Systolic Blood Pressure Intervention Trial) and ACCORD (Action to Control Cardiovascular Risk in Diabetes): A Possible Explanation for Discordant Trial Results. J Am Heart Assoc. 2017;6(11). https://doi.org/10.1161/JAHA.117.007509

  11. Ismail-Beigi F, Craven T, Banerji MA et al. Effect of intensive treatment of hyperglycaemia on microvascular outcomes in type 2 diabetes: an analysis of the ACCORD randomised trial. Lancet. 2010;376(9739):419–30

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Myers MG, Godwin M, Dawes M et al. Measurement of blood pressure in the office: recognizing the problem and proposing the solution. Hypertension. 2010;55(2):195–200

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Agarwal R. Implications of Blood Pressure Measurement Technique for Implementation of Systolic Blood Pressure Intervention Trial (SPRINT). J Am Heart Assoc. 2017;6(2). https://doi.org/10.1161/JAHA.116.004536

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Charité — Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Campus Benjamin Franklin, Med. Klinik mit SP Nephrologie Hochdruckzentrum, Hindenburgdamm 30, 12203, Berlin, Deutschland

    Markus van der Giet

Authors
  1. Markus van der Giet
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Markus van der Giet.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

van der Giet, M. Transatlantische Unterschiede bei den Hochdruckleitlinien. CV 19, 39–44 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s15027-019-1513-5

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s15027-019-1513-5

Search

Navigation