Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Langzeitrisiko nach assistierter Reproduktion

Ist das Krebsrisiko der Kinder erhöht?

  • Fortbildung
  • Published:
Pädiatrie Aims and scope

Da assistierte Reproduktionstechniken einen Eingriff in die natürlichen Abläufe darstellen, ist die Nachbeobachtung hierdurch gezeugter Kinder von herausragender Bedeutung. Mögliche Langzeitrisiken konnten jedoch bisher nicht abschließend beurteilt werden. Dies gilt auch für das Risiko einer Krebserkrankung.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Literatur

  1. Ludwig M, Katalinic A (2002) Malformation rate in fetuses and children conceived after ICSI: results of a prospective cohort study. Reprod Biomed Online 5:171–178

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Ludwig M, Katalinic A (2003) Pregnancy course and health of children born after ICSI depending on parameters of male factor infertility. Hum Reprod 18:351–357

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Davies MJ et al. (2012) Reproductive technologies and the risk of birth defects. N Engl J Med 366:1803–1813

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Pinborg A et al. (2013) Why do singletons conceived after assisted reproduction technology have adverse perinatal outcome? Systematic review and meta-analysis. Hum Reprod Update 19:87–104

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Ludwig AK et al. (2009) Physical health at 5.5 years of age of term-born singletons after intracytoplasmic sperm injection: results of a prospective, controlled, single-blinded study. Fertil Steril 91:115–124

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Kaatsch P (2010) Epidemiology of childhood cancer. Cancer Treat Rev 36:277–285

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Toren A et al. (1995) Two embryonal cancers after in vitro fertilization. Cancer 76:2372–2374

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Doyle P et al. (1998) Cancer incidence in children conceived with assisted reproduction technology. Lancet 352:452–453

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Bruinsma F et al. (2000) Incidence of cancer in children born after in-vitro fertilization. Hum Reprod 15:604–607

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Raimondi S, Pedotti P, Taioli E (2005) Meta-analysis of cancer incidence in children born after assisted reproductive technologies. Br J Cancer 93:1053–1056

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Kallen B et al. (2010) Cancer risk in children and young adults conceived by in vitro fertilization. Pediatrics 126:270–276

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Hargreave M et al. (2013) Fertility treatment and childhood cancer risk: a systematic meta-analysis. Fertil Steril 100:150–161

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Hargreave M et al. Maternal use of fertility drugs and risk of cancer in children-a nationwide population-based cohort study in Denmark. Int J Cancer 136(8):1931-1939

  14. Williams CL et al. (2013) Cancer risk among children born after assisted conception. N Engl J Med 369:1819–1827

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Puumala SE et al. (2012) Parental infertility, infertility treatment and hepatoblastoma: a report from the Children’s Oncology Group. Hum Reprod 27:1649–1656

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Barker DJ (1995) Fetal origins of coronary heart disease. BMJ 311:171–174

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Horsthemke B, Ludwig M (2005) Assisted reproduction: the epigenetic perspective. Hum Reprod Update 11:473–482

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Sundh KJ et al. (2014) Cancer in children and young adults born after assisted reproductive technology: a Nordic cohort study from the Committee of Nordic ART and Safety (CoNARTaS). Hum Reprod 29(9):2050–2057

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Vessey M, Yeates D (2013) Oral contraceptive use and cancer: final report from the Oxford-Family Planning Association contraceptive study. Contraception 88:678–683

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Facharztzentrum für Kinderwunsch, Pränatale Medizin, Endokrinologie und Osteologie amedes experts Hamburg, Mönckebergstraße 10, 20095, Hamburg, Deutschland

    Barbara Sonntag

  2. Hamburg, Deutschland

    Michael Ludwig (amedes experts)

Authors
  1. Barbara Sonntag
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Michael Ludwig
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Additional information

Interessenkonflikt

Die Autoren erklären, dass bei der Erstellung des Beitrags kein Interessenkonflikt vorlag.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Sonntag, B., Ludwig, M. Ist das Krebsrisiko der Kinder erhöht?. Pädiatrie 27, 36–38 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s15014-015-0570-1

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s15014-015-0570-1

Search

Navigation