Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Rezeptfreie Abgabe und ihre Folgen

Notfallkontrazeptiva — Bilanz nach Wegfall der Verschreibungspflicht

  • Fortbildung
  • Published:
gynäkologie + geburtshilfe Aims and scope

Der deutsche Bundesrat hat 2015 die Entlassung der Notfallkontrazeptiva aus der Verschreibungspflicht beschlossen. Beobachtungen aus anderen europäischen Ländern sowie erste Daten aus Deutschland zeigen, dass sich trotz dieser Liberalisierung der Abgabe bislang die Rate ungewollter Schwangerschaften nicht verringern ließ. Um dieses Ziel zu erreichen, ist weiterhin eine adäquate Aufklärungsarbeit auf verschiedenen Ebenen unerlässlich.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Literatur

  1. Wilcox, A.J., C.R. Weinberg, and D.D. Baird, Post-ovulatory ageing of the human oocyte and embryo failure. Hum Reprod, 1998. 13(2): p. 394–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Group, E.C., Emergency contraception. Widely available and effective but disappointing as a public health intervention: a review. Hum Reprod, 2015. 30(4): p. 751–60.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Cheng, L., Y. Che, and A.M. Gulmezoglu, Interventions for emergency contraception. Cochrane Database Syst Rev, 2012(8): p. CD001324.

  4. Brache, V., et al., Immediate pre-ovulatory administration of 30 mg ulipristal acetate significantly delays follicular rupture. Hum Reprod, 2010. 25(9): p. 2256–63.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Novikova, N., et al., Effectiveness of levonorgestrel emergency contraception given before or after ovulation — a pilot study. Contraception, 2007. 75(2): p. 112–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Brache, V., et al., Ulipristal acetate prevents ovulation more effectively than levonorgestrel: analysis of pooled data from three randomized trials of emergency contraception regimens. Contraception, 2013. 88(5): p. 611–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Gemzell-Danielsson, K., C. Berger, and P.G. Lalitkumar, Mechanisms of action of oral emergency contraception. Gynecol Endocrinol, 2014. 30(10): p. 685–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Gemzell-Danielsson, K., C. Berger, and G.L.L. P, Emergency contraception — mechanisms of action. Contraception, 2013. 87(3): p. 300–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Noe, G., et al., Contraceptive efficacy of emergency contraception with levonorgestrel given before or after ovulation. Contraception, 2011. 84(5): p. 486–92.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Glasier, A.F., et al., Ulipristal acetate versus levonorgestrel for emergency contraception: a randomised non-inferiority trial and meta-analysis. Lancet, 2010. 375(9714): p. 555–62.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Kiechle, M. and M. Neuenfeldt, Experience with oral emergency contraception since the OTC switch in Germany. Arch Gynecol Obstet, 2017. 295(3): p. 651–660.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Polis, C.B., et al., Advance provision of emergency contraception for pregnancy prevention: a meta-analysis. Obstet Gynecol, 2007. 110(6): p. 1379–88.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Rodriguez, M.I., et al., Advance supply of emergency contraception: a systematic review. Contraception, 2013. 87(5): p. 590–601.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Lakha, F. and A. Glasier, Unintended pregnancy and use of emergency contraception among a large cohort of women attending for antenatal care or abortion in Scotland. Lancet, 2006. 368(9549): p. 1782–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Sorensen, M.B., B.L. Pedersen, and L.E. Nyrnberg, Differences between users and non-users of emergency contraception after a recognized unprotected intercourse. Contraception, 2000. 62(1): p. 1–3.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Cameron, S.T., R. Gordon, and A. Glasier, The effect on use of making emergency contraception available free of charge. Contraception, 2012. 86(4): p. 366–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Westley, E., et al., A review of global access to emergency contraception. Int J Gynaecol Obstet, 2013. 123(1): p. 4–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. von Rosen, F.T., et al., Awareness and knowledge regarding emergency contraception in Berlin adolescents. Eur J Contracept Reprod Health Care, 2017. 22(1): p. 45–52.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Practice Bulletin Summary No. 152: Emergency Contraception. Obstet Gynecol, 2015. 126(3): p. 685-6.

  20. Dragoman, M.V., et al., Research gaps identified during the 2014 update of the WHO medical eligibility criteria for contraceptive use and selected practice recommendations for contraceptive use. Contraception, 2016. 94(3): p. 195–201.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Cameron, S.T., et al., The effects on ovarian activity of ulipristal acetate when ‚quickstarting‘ a combined oral contraceptive pill: a prospective, randomized, double-blind parallel-arm, placebo-controlled study. Hum Reprod, 2015. 30(7): p. 1566–72.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Brache, V., et al., A prospective, randomized, pharmacodynamic study of quick-starting a desogestrel progestin-only pill following ulipristal acetate for emergency contraception. Hum Reprod, 2015. 30(12): p. 2785–93.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Black, A., et al., Canadian Contraception Consensus (Part 2 of 4). J Obstet Gynaecol Can, 2015. 37(11): p. 1033–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Michie, L., et al., Contraceptive use among women presenting to pharmacies for emergency contraception: an opportunity for intervention. J Fam Plann Reprod Health Care, 2014. 40(3): p. 190–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Michie, L., et al., Pharmacy-based interventions for initiating effective contraception following the use of emergency contraception: a pilot study. Contraception, 2014. 90(4): p. 447–53.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Glasier, A., et al., Community pharmacists providing emergency contraception give little advice about future contraceptive use: a mystery shopper study. Contraception, 2010. 82(6): p. 538–42.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Mönckebergstraße 10, 20095, Hamburg, Deutschland

    Sabine Segerer (amedes experts)

Authors
  1. Sabine Segerer
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sabine Segerer.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Segerer, S. Notfallkontrazeptiva — Bilanz nach Wegfall der Verschreibungspflicht. gynäkologie + geburtshilfe 22, 34–38 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s15013-017-1282-0

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s15013-017-1282-0

Search

Navigation