The aim of this retrospective study was to investigate the impact of a broad spectrum of antihypertensive (AH) medications on urinary tract infections (UTI) of outpatients diagnosed in general practices in Germany.
This study included a total of 367,960 patients aged ≥ 18 years newly a diagnosed with UTI in 1274 general practices in Germany between January 2010 and December 2019. The analysis was conducted for five groups representing five AH therapy classes (diuretics (DIU); beta blockers (BB); calcium channel blockers (CCB); ACE inhibitors (ACEi); angiotensin II receptor blockers (ARB)), each containing 73,592 patients. A Cox regression model was used to analyze the association between each antihypertensive drug class and UTI incidence as compared to all other antihypertensive drug classes (as a group).
The incidence of UTI diagnosis was slightly higher in patients treated with DIU (8.6%), followed by ACEi (8.1%), ARB (7.9%), and CCB (6.5%). Antibiotic therapy for UTI was given in 5.6% of DIU and 4.3% of CCB patients. The incidence of UTI and antibiotic therapy was much higher in women than in men across all therapy classes. No significant increase or decrease in UTI incidence or antibiotic therapy was observed in any of the AH therapy classes investigated.
The present study did not identify a significant increase or decrease of UTI incidence or antibiotic therapy in patients treated with ACEi, ACB, CCB, beta blockers or diuretics. Across all AH classes studied, the incidence of UTI and antibiotic therapy was higher in women than in men, although not significantly.
Arterial hypertension (AH) is the most common preventable risk factor for cardiovascular disease (CVD) and chronic kidney disease (CKD) and is considered as the biggest single contributor to the global burden of disease and to global mortality with a total of 9.4 million deaths per year [1, 2]. The etiology of AH includes genetic predisposition, as well as a complex interplay of environmental and pathophysiological factors affecting multiple blood pressure (BP) regulation systems [3, 4]. One of the major BP regulation systems is the renin angiotensin aldosterone system (RAAS) which has a wide-ranging effect on BP control by regulating vascular tonicity as well as blood volume and, therefore, plays a pivotal role in AH pathogenesis [5, 6]. Based on this pathophysiological knowledge, a diverse subset of antihypertensive pharmacotherapeutics affecting the RAAS-System [e.g., ACE Inhibitors (ACEi) and Angiotensin II receptor blockers (ARB)] have been approved and have entered clinical practice in the past [7, 8]. However, clinicians are faced with many more classes of antihypertensive drugs, such as β-adrenoreceptor blockers (BB), calcium channel blockers (CCB), and different types of diuretics (DIU) [9, 10]. The World Health Organization (WHO) recently published a new guideline for the pharmacological treatment of AH in adults based on the data from 32 systematic reviews and pinpointed thiazide diuretics, ACEi/ARB’s, and long-acting dihydropyridine calcium channel blockers as first-line therapeutic agents. Especially in the treatment of patients with multimorbidity and frailty, these guidelines recommend clinical judgment because of potential risks arising from treatment side effects such as acute kidney injury, hyperkalemia, hypotension, and syncope which can result in hospital admission and reduced adherence of patients to antihypertensive medications [11, 12].
In view of these known side effects, the emergence of urinary tract infections (UTI) has become a subject of intense discussion in literature and has also repeatedly been identified as a possible side effect of antihypertensive therapy [13,14,15]. In general, UTIs are one of the most common diseases seen in general practitioner practices in Germany and are classified as either lower (confined to the bladder) or upper (pyelonephritis) and either uncomplicated (no relevant functional or anatomical anomalies in the urinary tract) or complicated (when those anomalies are present) [16, 17]. However, the evidence in the literature to date regarding the possible association between antihypertensive drugs and UTI is unsatisfying and contradictory. In this context, a population-based prescription sequence symmetry analysis conducted by Pouwels et al. showed a statistically significant increased risk of developing UTI upon ACEi initiation, whereas no association was found between beta blockers and UTI treatment.
Therefore, the aim of the present study is to analyze the incidence of UTI as a function of antihypertensive therapy and to reveal any potential association between a broad spectrum of antihypertensive medication and UTI incidence in outpatients with AH treated in general practices in Germany.
This study was based on data from the Disease Analyzer database (IQVIA), which contains drug prescriptions, diagnoses, and basic medical and demographic data obtained directly and in anonymous format from computer systems used in the practices of general practitioners and specialists . The database covers approximately 3% of all outpatient practices in Germany. Diagnoses (according to the International Classification of Diseases, 10th revision [ICD-10]), prescriptions (according to the Anatomical Therapeutic Chemical [ATC] classification system), and the quality of reported data are monitored by IQVIA. In Germany, the sampling methods used to select physicians’ practices are appropriate for obtaining a representative database of general and specialized practices. It has previously been shown that the panel of practices included in the Disease Analyzer database is representative of general and specialized practices in Germany . Finally, this database has already been used in previous studies focusing on antihypertensive therapy [19, 20] as well as urinary tract infections [21, 22].
This retrospective cohort study included adult patients (≥ 18 years) with an initial prescription of a single antihypertensive therapy (diuretics, ATC: C03A; beta blockers, ATC: C07A; calcium channel blockers, ATC: C08A; ACE inhibitors, ATC: C09A; angiotensin II receptor blockers, ATC: C09A) in 1,274 general practices in Germany between January 2010 and December 2019 (index date; Fig. 1). Patients diagnosed with urinary tract infections, site not specified (ICD-10: N39.0) or acute cystitis (ICD-10: N30.0) within 12 months prior to or on the index date were excluded.
Five groups of patients treated with different antihypertensive drug classes were matched 1:1:1:1:1 to controls by propensity scores based on sex, age, and diagnoses documented within 12 months prior to or on the index date including diabetes (ICD-10: E10–E11), hypertension (ICD-10: I10), renal failure (ICD-10: N18, N19), and cancer (ICD-10: C00–C97), as well as therapy duration in months.
Study outcomes and covariates
The main outcome of the study was the incidence of UTI within 12 months after the index date as a function of antihypertensive therapy. Each patient was followed for up to 12 months from the index date until the first UTI diagnosis was documented or antihypertensive therapy ended (either because of a switch to a different antihypertensive therapy or the addition of another drug class to the initial single therapy).
Differences in the sample characteristics between five antihypertensive drug class groups were tested using chi-squared tests for categorical variables and Kruskal–Wallis tests for age. Conditional Cox regression models were applied to study the association between each antihypertensive drug class and UTI incidence as compared to all other antihypertensive drug classes (as a group). These models were applied separately for four age groups and also for women and men. As a sensitivity analysis, the outcome was additionally defined as the diagnosis of UTI plus a prescription of an antibiotic drug (ATC: J01) within 7 days following UTI diagnosis. Both regression models were adjusted for the physicians’ practices to reflect the diagnosis behavior of treating physicians. To counteract the problem of multiple comparisons and also due to the large patient samples, p values < 0.01 were considered statistically significant. Analyses were carried out using SAS version 9.4 (SAS institute, Cary, USA).
Basic characteristics of the study sample
The present study included five therapy class groups, each comprising 73,592 patients (367,960 patients in total). The basic characteristics of the study patients are displayed in Table 1. Due to the matched pair design of this study, all five cohorts had the same age, sex, and comorbidity structure. The mean age [SD] was 66.5 [SD: 13.7] years; 55.2% of patients were women, prevalence of diabetes was 17.0%, hypertension 55.1%, renal failure 3.5%, cancer 5.9%. On average, patients were treated for approximately 250 days until therapy switch or break.
Cumulative incidence of UTI diagnosis
Figure 2 shows the incidence (cases per 1000 patient years) of UTI diagnosis. This incidence was slightly higher in patients treated with diuretics (8.6%), followed by ACEi (8.1%), and ARB (7.9%). The lowest incidence was in patients treated with CCB (6.5%). Antibiotic therapy for UTI was given in 5.6 DIU and 4.3% CCB patients. The incidence of UTI and antibiotic therapy was much higher in women than in men across all therapy classes.
Association between antihypertensive therapy and incidence of UTI
Table 2 shows the results of the conditional regression analyses. No significant increase or decrease in UTI incidence or antibiotic therapy was observed in any of the therapy classes investigated. ARB was associated with an increased incidence of UTI (HR: 1.20, 95% CI 1.03–1.39) among women only with a p value of 0.020, but this was not considered statistically significant in this study.
The present retrospective cohort study included 73,592 patients for each class of antihypertensive drugs (367,960 patients in total) and found no significant increase or decrease in UTI incidence or antibiotic therapy in any of the therapy classes investigated. However, our results showed that the incidence of UTI and antibiotic therapy was much higher in women than in men across all antihypertensive therapy classes. These results are in line with the current literature, where UTI is considered the most common outpatient infection worldwide, having a prevalence of 23.3% for women and 6.8% for men, respectively . A recently published study by Laupland et al. conducted population-based laboratory monitoring for all community-onset urinary tract infections among all residents of the Calgary Health region (~ 1.2 million residents) in Canada. During the 2 years of the study (2004–2005), there was a significant relationship between both age and sex and the incidence for outpatient onset UTI. The overall incidence in females was much higher than that in males (30.0 vs 5.0 per 1000, RR 5.98; 95% CI 5.81–6.15; p < 0.0001) and a substantial increase was observed in association with advancing age, reaching up to 637.8 (m) and 925.7 (f) per 1000/year in the very old (90 years of age) . In most cases, UTI is treated with antibiotics, although focusing on more differentiated antibiotic drug prescription for UTI is an important issue with respect to reducing antimicrobial resistance. In this context a population-based cohort study recently showed that women suffering from UTI received significantly more antimicrobial drug prescriptions than men (45.2% vs. 12.6%) and the proportion of prescriptions for UTIs among all prescriptions with an indication code increased from 5.2% in 1996 to 14% in 2014 in men and from 28% in 1996 to 50% in 2014 in women . Bearing in mind the issue of demographic change, the ageing of the population may partly explain the phenomenon of increased antibiotic drug prescriptions for UTI because antibiotics were most commonly prescribed to patients in older age categories [25, 26]. The difference observed between men and women is certainly also due to the anatomically determined length of the urethra, which means that UTIs occur less frequently in men.
However, UTIs are not only considered the most common of all bacterial infections but also cause enormous societal costs (cost of general and specialized medical visits, prescription drugs, diagnostic tests, hospitalizations etc.) [27,28,29]. In view of this, there is an urgent need to clarify the development of UTIs as possible side effects of different pharmacotherapeutics. Notably, the results of previous pharmacoepidemiologic studies on this topic are contradictory and insufficient. A prescription sequence symmetry analysis performed using the Dutch InterAction pharmacy prescription database, revealed a statistically significant increased risk of starting UTI antibiotic therapy after starting ACEi treatment, whereas no association was found between beta blockers and UTI treatment. Notably, the excess of patients who received an antibiotic prescription was only significant for the first month after ACEi initiation [13, 14]. Based on this finding, the authors introduced the hypothesis that ACEi may occasionally lead to a decreased glomerular filtration rate (GFR) and the risk of developing UTI may increase as a consequence of lower urine output. They also found that the association between ACEi therapy and UTI antibiotic prescription was stronger among patients with diabetes then those without diabetes, possibly due to diabetes-related renal impairment [13, 14, 30,31,32,33]. Nevertheless, this study is also subject to a number of methodological limitations (e.g., using nitrofurantoin prescriptions as a proxy with insufficient sensitivity for UTI) [14, 34].
Another study was conducted as a post hoc analysis using data from the REnal and Vascular ENdstage Disease Intervention Trial (PREVEND IT), a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial in which participants received pravastatin, fosinopril or placebo on a randomized basis in a 2 × 2 factorial design over 4 years [15, 35, 36]. In particular, the ACEi fosinopril was associated with an increased occurrence of initial UTI antibiotic prescriptions (HR, 1.82; 95% CI 1.16–2.88) . However, this study was not designed and powered for a post hoc analysis and again used a proxy (antibiotic prescriptions) with limited sensitivity for the detection of UTI. In line with our observations, no studies are available that indicate that ACEi also increases the occurrence of UTI. Based on a reduced urine output as a result of ACEi treatment it could almost be assumed, that ACEi might increase the frequency of UTI [31, 32]. This hypothesis must be questioned, however, since a study has recently been published indicating that loop diuretics can deplete the renal cortico-medullary salt gradient as a major modulator of immune responses. As a result, renal transplant recipients suffer from a markedly increased rate of urinary tract infections (UTIs) upon treatment with diuresis-increasing loop diuretics .
Mansfield et al. analyzed the role of ACEi/ARBs or alternative AH therapeutics (β-blockers, calcium channel blockers, or thiazide diuretics) between April 1997 and March 2014 in a self-controlled case series (SCCS) in patients with acute kidney injury (AKI) following various infections (urinary tract infection, lower respiratory tract infection, and gastroenteritis). In this setting, acute infections (incl. UTI) are associated with a substantially increased risk of transient AKI among patients treated with AH drugs. However, the increase in relative risk was not higher among patients receiving ACEis/ARBs than in those treated with other AH drugs .
Unfortunately, there is still a lack of evidence in the literature for the incidence of UTI as a function of other AH therapeutics, e.g., CCB, ARBs, and diuretics. Particularly in view of this limited evidence, further research is needed concerning the role of UTI in patients receiving AH medications.
Strengths and limitations
Our retrospective cohort study has several strengths: The German Disease Analyzer (DA) is a large European outpatient database containing data from 2898 practices with about 7.8 million patients in Germany and the representativeness of the diagnoses it contains has already been validated [18, 39]. Furthermore, DA provides continuously updated data generated directly from practice computers based on patient data (diagnoses, demographic data, prescriptions, several measurements, etc.) and has been successfully used for several pharmacoepidemiology studies in various disciplines [18, 40,41,42]. However, the DA does not contain information on external confounding factors (alcohol and tobacco consumption, socioeconomic status, etc.) and there is also a lack of hospital data and information on mortality that should be considered. Furthermore, diagnoses are based solely on ICD-10 codes documented by general practitioners and do not include diagnoses by gynecologists or urologists, which could influence the quality of the documented diagnoses. Moreover, using ICD-10 Code N39.0 (urinary tract infections, site not specified) is not sufficient to distinguish between upper or lower UTI. In addition, there is a lack of information regarding the specific UTI bacterial spectrum or the exact classification (complicated vs. uncomplicated).
Finally, it should be mentioned that the retrospective cohort design does not allow conclusions to be drawn concerning the causality of the present findings.
The present study did not identify any significant increase or decrease in UTI incidence or antibiotic therapy in outpatients treated with ACEi, ACB, CCB, beta blockers or diuretics. The incidence of UTI and antibiotic therapy was higher in women than in men across all AH classes, although not significantly.
Availability of data and material
Anonymized raw data available on reasonable request.
Zhou B, Perel P, Mensah GA, Ezzati M. Global epidemiology, health burden and effective interventions for elevated blood pressure and hypertension. Nat Rev Cardiol. 2021;18:785–802. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41569-021-00559-8.
Forouzanfar MH, Alexander L, Anderson HR, Bachman VF, Biryukov S, Brauer M, et al. Global, regional, and national comparative risk assessment of 79 behavioural, environmental and occupational, and metabolic risks or clusters of risks in 188 countries, 1990–2013: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2013. Lancet. 2015;386:2287–323. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(15)00128-2.
Oparil S, Acelajado MC, Bakris GL, Berlowitz DR, Cífková R, Dominiczak AF, et al. Hypertension. Nat Rev Dis Primers. 2018;4:18014. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrdp.2018.14.
Lifton RP, Gharavi AG, Geller DS. Molecular mechanisms of human hypertension. Cell. 2001;104:545–56. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0092-8674(01)00241-0.
Navar LG. Physiology: hemodynamics, endothelial function, renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system, sympathetic nervous system. J Am Soc Hypertens. 2014;8:519–24. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jash.2014.05.014.
Jia G, Aroor AR, Hill MA, Sowers JR. Role of renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system activation in promoting cardiovascular fibrosis and stiffness. Hypertension. 2018;72:537–48. https://doi.org/10.1161/HYPERTENSIONAHA.118.11065.
Patel S, Rauf A, Khan H, Abu-Izneid T. Renin-angiotensin-aldosterone (RAAS): the ubiquitous system for homeostasis and pathologies. Biomed Pharmacother. 2017;94:317–25. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biopha.2017.07.091.
Romero CA, Orias M, Weir MR. Novel RAAS agonists and antagonists: clinical applications and controversies. Nat Rev Endocrinol. 2015;11:242–52. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrendo.2015.6.
James PA, Oparil S, Carter BL, Cushman WC, Dennison-Himmelfarb C, Handler J, et al. 2014 evidence-based guideline for the management of high blood pressure in adults: report from the panel members appointed to the Eighth Joint National Committee (JNC 8). JAMA. 2014;311:507–20. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2013.284427.
Esam H, Kanukula R, Dhurjati R, Aerram R, Chevireddy S, Bhaumik S, et al. Systematic reviews of antihypertensive drugs: a review of publication trends, characteristics, and quality. J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich). 2021;23:915–22. https://doi.org/10.1111/jch.14216.
Albasri A, Hattle M, Koshiaris C, Dunnigan A, Paxton B, Fox SE, et al. Association between antihypertensive treatment and adverse events: systematic review and meta-analysis. BMJ. 2021;372:n189. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.n189.
Benetos A, Petrovic M, Strandberg T. Hypertension management in older and frail older patients. Circ Res. 2019;124:1045–60. https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCRESAHA.118.313236.
Pouwels KB, Bos JH, Hak E. ACE inhibitors and urinary tract infections. Epidemiology. 2014;25:466–7. https://doi.org/10.1097/EDE.0000000000000088.
Pouwels KB, Visser ST, Bos HJ, Hak E. Angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor treatment and the development of urinary tract infections: a prescription sequence symmetry analysis. Drug Saf. 2013;36:1079–86. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40264-013-0085-z.
Pouwels KB, Visser ST, Hak E. Effect of pravastatin and fosinopril on recurrent urinary tract infections. J Antimicrob Chemother. 2013;68:708–14. https://doi.org/10.1093/jac/dks419.
Lecky DM, Howdle J, Butler CC, McNulty CA. Optimising management of UTIs in primary care: a qualitative study of patient and GP perspectives to inform the development of an evidence-based, shared decision-making resource. Br J Gen Pract. 2020;70:e330–8. https://doi.org/10.3399/bjgp20X708173.
Foxman B. The epidemiology of urinary tract infection. Nat Rev Urol. 2010;7:653–60. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrurol.2010.190.
Rathmann W, Bongaerts B, Carius HJ, Kruppert S, Kostev K. Basic characteristics and representativeness of the German disease analyzer database. Int J Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2018;56:459–66. https://doi.org/10.5414/CP203320.
Warda A, Reese JP, Tanislav C, Kostev K. The association between antihypertensive therapy and the incidence of Parkinson’s disease in patients followed in general practices in Germany. Int J Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2019;57:483–8. https://doi.org/10.5414/CP203559.
Jacob L, Kostev K. Persistence with antihypertensive drugs in patients with depression in Germany. Int J Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2018;56:162–8. https://doi.org/10.5414/CP203088.
Heidemann J, Kalder M, Kostev K. Association between contraceptive use and risk of lower urinary tract infection (LUTI): a case-control study. Int J Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2022;60:167–75. https://doi.org/10.5414/CP204177.
Heidemann J, Schmitz B, Kostev K. Association between antiseizure medication use and risk of urinary tract infection: a case-control study. Epilepsy Behav. 2021;115:107502. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.yebeh.2020.107502.
Medina M, Castillo-Pino E. An introduction to the epidemiology and burden of urinary tract infections. Ther Adv Urol. 2019;11:1756287219832172. https://doi.org/10.1177/1756287219832172.
Laupland KB, Ross T, Pitout JD, Church DL, Gregson DB. Community-onset urinary tract infections: a population-based assessment. Infection. 2007;35:150–3. https://doi.org/10.1007/s15010-007-6180-2.
Mulder M, Baan E, Verbon A, Stricker B, Verhamme K. Trends of prescribing antimicrobial drugs for urinary tract infections in primary care in the Netherlands: a population-based cohort study. BMJ Open. 2019;9:e027221. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2018-027221.
Haeseker MB, Dukers-Muijrers NH, Hoebe CJ, Bruggeman CA, Cals JW, Verbon A. Trends in antibiotic prescribing in adults in Dutch general practice. PLoS ONE. 2012;7:e51860. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0051860.
François M, Hanslik T, Dervaux B, Le Strat Y, Souty C, Vaux S, et al. The economic burden of urinary tract infections in women visiting general practices in France: a cross-sectional survey. BMC Health Serv Res. 2016;16:365. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-016-1620-2.
Schappert SM, Burt CW. Ambulatory care visits to physician offices, hospital outpatient departments, and emergency departments: United States, 2001–02. Vital Health Stat. 2006;13:1–66.
Foxman B, Barlow R, D’Arcy H, Gillespie B, Sobel JD. Urinary tract infection: self-reported incidence and associated costs. Ann Epidemiol. 2000;10:509–15. https://doi.org/10.1016/s1047-2797(00)00072-7.
Schoolwerth AC, Sica DA, Ballermann BJ, Wilcox CS, Association CotKiCDatCfHBPRotAH. Renal considerations in angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitor therapy: a statement for healthcare professionals from the Council on the Kidney in Cardiovascular Disease and the Council for High Blood Pressure Research of the American Heart Association. Circulation. 2001;104:1985–91. https://doi.org/10.1161/hc4101.096153.
Juhlin T, Björkman S, Höglund P. Cyclooxygenase inhibition causes marked impairment of renal function in elderly subjects treated with diuretics and ACE-inhibitors. Eur J Heart Fail. 2005;7:1049–56. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejheart.2004.10.005.
Beetz R. Mild dehydration: a risk factor of urinary tract infection? Eur J Clin Nutr. 2003;57(Suppl 2):S52–8. https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.ejcn.1601902.
Meyers JL, Candrilli SD, Kovacs B. Type 2 diabetes mellitus and renal impairment in a large outpatient electronic medical records database: rates of diagnosis and antihyperglycemic medication dose adjustment. Postgrad Med. 2011;123:133–43. https://doi.org/10.3810/pgm.2011.05.2291.
Akkerman AE, Kuyvenhoven MM, Verheij TJ, van Dijk L. Antibiotics in Dutch general practice: nationwide electronic GP database and national reimbursement rates. Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 2008;17:378–83. https://doi.org/10.1002/pds.1501.
Diercks GF, Janssen WM, van Boven AJ, Bak AA, de Jong PE, Crijns HJ, et al. Rationale, design, and baseline characteristics of a trial of prevention of cardiovascular and renal disease with fosinopril and pravastatin in nonhypertensive, nonhypercholesterolemic subjects with microalbuminuria (the Prevention of REnal and Vascular ENdstage Disease Intervention Trial [PREVEND IT]). Am J Cardiol. 2000;86:635–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0002-9149(00)01042-0.
Asselbergs FW, Diercks GF, Hillege HL, van Boven AJ, Janssen WM, Voors AA, et al. Effects of fosinopril and pravastatin on cardiovascular events in subjects with microalbuminuria. Circulation. 2004;110:2809–16. https://doi.org/10.1161/01.CIR.0000146378.65439.7A.
Casper J, Schmitz J, Bräsen JH, Khalifa A, Schmidt BMW, Einecke G, et al. Renal transplant recipients receiving loop diuretic therapy have increased urinary tract infection rate and altered medullary macrophage polarization marker expression. Kidney Int. 2018;94:993–1001. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.kint.2018.06.029.
Mansfield KE, Douglas IJ, Nitsch D, Thomas SL, Smeeth L, Tomlinson LA. Acute kidney injury and infections in patients taking antihypertensive drugs: a self-controlled case series analysis. Clin Epidemiol. 2018;10:187–202. https://doi.org/10.2147/CLEP.S146757.
Becher H, Kostev K, Schröder-Bernhardi D. Validity and representativeness of the “disease analyzer” patient database for use in pharmacoepidemiological and pharmacoeconomic studies. Int J Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2009;47:617–26. https://doi.org/10.5414/cpp47617.
Kowall B, Stang A, Rathmann W, Kostev K. No reduced risk of overall, colorectal, lung, breast, and prostate cancer with metformin therapy in diabetic patients: database analyses from Germany and the UK. Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 2015;24:865–74. https://doi.org/10.1002/pds.3823.
Gollwitzer S, Kostev K, Hagge M, Lang J, Graf W, Hamer HM. Nonadherence to antiepileptic drugs in Germany: a retrospective, population-based study. Neurology. 2016;87:466–72. https://doi.org/10.1212/WNL.0000000000002791.
Rathmann W, Bongaerts B, Kostev K. Change in glycated haemoglobin levels after initiating second-line therapy in type 2 diabetes: a primary care database study. Diabetes Obes Metab. 2016;18:840–3. https://doi.org/10.1111/dom.12673.
Open Access funding enabled and organized by Projekt DEAL. The authors have received no financial support for the research, authorship, and /or publication of this article.
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.
The database used includes only anonymized data in compliance with the regulations of the applicable data protection laws. German law allows the use of anonymous electronic medical records for research purposes under certain conditions. According to this legislation, it is not necessary to obtain informed consent from patients or approval from a medical ethics committee for this type of observational study that contains no directly identifiable data.
Because patients were only queried as aggregates and no protected health information was available for queries, no Institutional Review Board approval was required for the use of this database or the completion of this study.
About this article
Cite this article
Gremke, N., Kostev, K. & Kalder, M. Association between antihypertensive medication and the risk of urinary tract infection (UTI) of outpatients: a retrospective cohort study. Infection (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s15010-022-01895-8
- Antihypertensive medication
- Arterial hypertension (AH)
- Antibiotic therapy
- Urinary tract infections (UTI)
- Pharmacological side effects