Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Comparison of isolated respiratory and extrarespiratory mucormycosis: a 21-year observational study of 44 cases

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Infection Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Objectives

This study aimed to compare the clinical characteristics and outcomes of patients with isolated respiratory and extrarespiratory mucormycosis.

Methods

Adult patients diagnosed with proven or probable invasive mucormycosis in a tertiary hospital in South Korea, between 1999 and 2020 were retrospectively reviewed. We compared the clinical, mycological characteristics, and outcomes of patients with isolated respiratory mucormycosis (IRM) and those with extrarespiratory mucormycosis (ERM).

Results

A total of 44 patients including 32 (72%) with IRM, and 12 (27%) with ERM were enrolled. Of these, 38 (86%) were classified as proven and 6 (14%) as probable invasive mucormycosis according to the EORTC/MSG criteria. Univariate analysis exhibited that old age, surgery, and intensive care unit were associated with ERM, and multivariable analysis revealed that variable associated with ERM was intensive care unit (aOR 9.80; 95% CI 2.07–46.35; P = 0.004). There were no significant differences in 90-day mortality between patients with IRM and ERM (38% vs 50%, P = 0.45). In multivariable analysis, neutropenia (aOR 6.88; 95% CI 1.67–28.27; P = 0.01) was an independent risk factor for 90-day mortality.

Conclusions

More than a quarter of patients with mucormycosis had extrarespiratory manifestations, especially in patients who were admitted to intensive care unit. The mortality of the patients with ERM was comparable to that of the patients with IRM, although the patients with ERM received ICU care more frequently.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Kauffman CA, Malani AN. Zygomycosis: an emerging fungal infection with new options for management. Curr Infect Dis Rep. 2007;9:435–40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Kontoyiannis DP. Agents of mucormycosis and entomophthoramycosis. In. Mandell, Douglas, and Bennett’s Principles and Practice of Infectious Disease ed. Elsevier: Philadelphia; 2020.

  3. Roden MM, Zaoutis TE, Buchanan WL, Knudsen TA, Sarkisova TA, Schaufele RL, et al. Epidemiology and outcome of zygomycosis: a review of 929 reported cases. Clin Infect Dis. 2005;41:634–53.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Almyroudis NG, Sutton DA, Linden P, Rinaldi MG, Fung J, Kusne S. Zygomycosis in solid organ transplant recipients in a tertiary transplant center and review of the literature. Am J Transplant. 2006;6:2365–74.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Kontoyiannis DP, Lionakis MS, Lewis RE, Chamilos G, Healy M, Perego C, et al. Zygomycosis in a tertiary-care cancer center in the era of Aspergillus-active antifungal therapy: a case-control observational study of 27 recent cases. J Infect Dis. 2005;191:1350–60.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Praneenararat S. Fungal infection of the colon. Clin Exp Gastroenterol. 2014;7:415–26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Prescott RJ, Harris M, Banerjee SS. Fungal infections of the small and large intestine. J Clin Pathol. 1992;45:806–11.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Donnelly JP, Chen SC, Kauffman CA, Steinbach WJ, Baddley JW, Verweij PE, et al. Revision and Update of the consensus definitions of invasive fungal disease from the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer and the Mycoses Study Group Education and Research Consortium. Clin Infect Dis. 2020;71:1367–76.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Choi S, Song JS, Kim JY, Cha HH, Yun JH, Park JW, et al. Diagnostic performance of immunohistochemistry for the aspergillosis and mucormycosis. Mycoses. 2019;62:1006–14.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Rubin LG, Levin MJ, Ljungman P, Davies EG, Avery R, Tomblyn M, et al. 2013 IDSA clinical practice guideline for vaccination of the immunocompromised host. Clin Infect Dis. 2014;58:e44-100.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Singer M, Deutschman CS, Seymour CW, Shankar-Hari M, Annane D, Bauer M, et al. The third international consensus definitions for sepsis and septic shock (sepsis-3). JAMA. 2016;315:801–10.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Jung J, Park YS, Sung H, Song JS, Lee SO, Choi SH, et al. Using immunohistochemistry to assess the accuracy of histomorphologic diagnosis of aspergillosis and mucormycosis. Clin Infect Dis. 2015;61:1664–70.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Hoog S, Guarro J, Gené J, Figueras M. Atlas of clinical fungi 2nd ed. Centraalbureau voor Schimmelcultures. Utrecht and Universitat Rovira I Virgili, Reus; 2000

  14. Spellberg B, Kontoyiannis DP, Fredricks D, Morris MI, Perfect JR, Chin-Hong PV, et al. Risk factors for mortality in patients with mucormycosis. Med Mycol. 2012;50:611–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Son HJ, Song JS, Choi S, Jung J, Kim MJ, Chong YP, et al. Risk factors for mortality in patients with pulmonary mucormycosis. Mycoses. 2020;63:729–36.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Hong HL, Lee YM, Kim T, Lee JY, Chung YS, Kim MN, et al. Risk factors for mortality in patients with invasive mucormycosis. Infect Chemother. 2013;45:292–8.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Spellberg B, Edwards J Jr, Ibrahim A. Novel perspectives on mucormycosis: pathophysiology, presentation, and management. Clin Microbiol Rev. 2005;18:556–69.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

This work was supported by a grant from the Korea Health Technology R&D Project through the Korea Health Industry Development Institute (KHIDI), funded by the Ministry of Health & Welfare, Republic of Korea (grant no. HI20C0073).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

Conceptualization: HS, S-HK; methodology: HS, S-HK; data curation: HS, H-JS, SC; software, formal analysis: HS; writing—original draft: HS; writing—review and editing: S-HK; supervision: JJ, MJK, YPC, JSS, S-OL, S-HC, YSK; funding acquisition: S-HK.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sung-Han Kim.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare no potential conflicts of interest.

Supplementary Information

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary file1 (DOCX 20 KB)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Seo, H., Son, HJ., Choi, S. et al. Comparison of isolated respiratory and extrarespiratory mucormycosis: a 21-year observational study of 44 cases. Infection 50, 1313–1320 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s15010-022-01831-w

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s15010-022-01831-w

Keywords

Navigation