Optimal duration of antimicrobial therapy for uncomplicated Gram-negative bloodstream infections
- 1.8k Downloads
Optimal antimicrobial treatment duration for Gram-negative bloodstream infection (BSI) remains unclear. This retrospective cohort study examined effectiveness of short (7–10 days) and long (>10 days) courses of antimicrobial therapy for uncomplicated Gram-negative BSI.
Hospitalized adults with uncomplicated Gram-negative BSI at Palmetto Health hospitals in Columbia SC, USA from January 1, 2010 to December 31, 2013 were identified. Multivariate Cox proportional hazards regression with propensity score adjustment was used to examine risk of treatment failure in the two groups.
During the study period, 117 and 294 patients received short and long courses of antimicrobial therapy for uncomplicated Gram-negative BSI, respectively. Overall, the median age was 67 years, 258 (63%) were women, 282 (69%) had urinary source of infection, and 271 (66%) had BSI due to Escherichia coli. The median duration of antimicrobial therapy was 8.5 and 13.3 days in the short and long treatment groups, respectively. After adjustment for the propensity to use a short course of therapy, risk of treatment failure was higher in patients receiving short compared to long courses of antimicrobial agents (HR 2.60, 95% CI: 1.20–5.53, p = 0.02). Other risk factors for treatment failure included liver cirrhosis (HR 5.83, 95% CI: 1.89–15.02, p = 0.004) and immune compromised status (HR 4.30, 95% CI: 1.57–10.80, p = 0.006). Definitive antimicrobial therapy with intravenous or highly bioavailable oral agents was associated with reduced risk of treatment failure (HR 0.33, 95% CI: 0.14–0.73, p = 0.006).
The current results support common clinical practice of 2 weeks of antimicrobial therapy for uncomplicated Gram-negative BSI.
KeywordsBacteremia Sepsis Antibiotics Antibacterial agents Enterobacteriaceae
The authors thank the Palmetto Health Antimicrobial Stewardship and Support Team in South Carolina, USA for their help in facilitating the conduction of this study. The preliminary results of this study were presented in part at IDWeek annual meeting in October 26-30, 2016; New Orleans, LA, USA (Abstract # 59811). ANN and MNA have full access to all the data in the study and take responsibility for the integrity of the data and accuracy of the analysis.
ANN received funding from the Medical Scholars Program 2016 of the Infectious Disease Society of America Education and Research Foundation. Funding source had no role in study design. The study had no other sources of funding.
Compliance with ethical standards
Conflict of interest
ANN, JAJ, JK and HA: No conflicts. PBB and MNA: Continuous medical education steering committee for Rockpointe Corporation, Columbia, MD, USA.
- 4.Retamar P, Portillo MM, López-Prieto MD, Rodríguez-López F, de Cueto M, García MV, Gómez MJ, Del Arco A, Muñoz A, Sánchez-Porto A, Torres-Tortosa M, Martín-Aspas A, Arroyo A, García-Figueras C, Acosta F, Corzo JE, León-Ruiz L, Escobar-Lara T, Rodríguez-Baño J. SAEI/SAMPAC Bacteremia Group. Impact of inadequate empirical therapy on the mortality of patients with bloodstream infections: a propensity score-based analysis. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2012;56:472–8.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- 7.Battle SE, Bookstaver PB, Justo JA, Kohn J, Albrecht H, Al-Hasan MN. Association between inappropriate empirical antimicrobial therapy and hospital length of stay in gram-negative bloodstream infections: stratification by prognosis. J Antimicrob Chemother. 2017;72:299–304.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 12.Mermel LA, Allon M, Bouza E, Craven DE, Flynn P, O’Grady NP, Raad II, Rijnders BJ, Sherertz RJ, Warren DK. Clinical practice guidelines for the diagnosis and management of intravascular catheter-related infection: 2009 update by the Infectious Disease Society of America. Clin Infect Dis. 2009;49:1–45.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- 14.Friedman ND, Kaye KS, Stout JE, McGarry SA, Trivette SL, Briggs JP, Lamm W, Clark C, MacFarquhar J, Walton AL, Reller LB, Sexton DJ. Health-care associated bloodstream infections in adults: a reason to change the accepted definition of community-acquired infections. Ann Intern Med. 2002;137:791–7.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 15.Grayson ML, Crowe SM, McCarthy S, Mills J, Mouton JW, Norrby SR, Paterson DL, Pfaller MA. Kucers’: the use of antibiotics. 6th ed. London: CRC Press; 2010.Google Scholar
- 19.López-Cortés LE, Del Toro MD, Gálvez-Acebal J, Bereciartua-Bastarrica E, Fariñas MC, Sanz-Franco M, Natera C, Corzo JE, Lomas JM, Pasquau J, Del Arco A, Martínez MP, Romero A, Muniain MA, de Cueto M, Pascual A, Rodríguez-Baño J. REIPI/SAB group. Impact of an evidence-based bundle intervention in the quality-of-care management and outcome of Staphylococcus aureus bacteremia. Clin Infect Dis. 2013;57:1225–33.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 23.Daneman N, Rishu AH, Xiong W, Bagshaw SM, Dodek P, Hall R, Kumar A, Lamontagne F, Lauzier F, Marshall J, Martin CM, McIntyre L, Muscedere J, Reynolds S, Stelfox HT, Cook DJ, Fowler RA, Canadian Critical Care Trials Group. Duration of antimicrobial treatment for bacteremia in canadian critically Ill patients. Crit Care Med. 2016;44:256–64.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 25.Sandberg T, Skoog G, Hermansson AB, Kahlmeter G, Kuylenstierna N, Lannergård A, Otto G, Settergren B, Ekman GS. Ciprofloxacin for 7 days versus 14 days in women with acute pyelonephritis: a randomised, open-label and double-blind, placebo-controlled, non-inferiority trial. Lancet. 2012;380:484–90.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 26.Eliakim-Raz N, Yahav D, Paul M, Leibovici L. Duration of antibiotic treatment for acute pyelonephritis and septic urinary tract infection- 7 days or less versus longer treatment: systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. J Antimicrob Chemother. 2013;68:2183–91.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 27.Gupta K, Hooton TM, Naber KG, Wullt B, Colgan R, Miller LG, Moran GJ, Nicolle LE, Raz R, Schaeffer AJ, Soper DE. International clinical practice guidelines for the treatment of acute uncomplicated cystitis and pyelonephritis in women: A 2010 update by the Infectious Diseases Society of America and the European Society for Microbiology and Infectious Diseases. Clin Infect Dis. 2011;52:e103–20.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar