Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Characteristics and treatment outcomes of 69 cases with early prosthetic joint infections of the hip and knee

  • Clinical and Epidemiological Study
  • Published:
Infection Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

Early prosthetic joint infection (PJI) can be treated with an intensive surgical debridement and implant retention (DAIR) of the prosthesis if (1) the prosthesis is stable, (2) the pathogen is not a difficult-to-treat microorganism, (3) symptoms have lasted for <3 weeks and (4) a sinus tract is absent.

Methods

We retrospectively evaluated the treatment outcome of early PJI in the hip and knee in a single orthopaedic centre. An early PJI was defined as a prosthesis infection within 3 months after primary implantation or revision surgery for a non-infectious cause.

Results

We identified 69 patients with confirmed early PJI, with a median age of 71 (range 33–84) years. Only 64 % presented with ≥2 acute signs of infection. The most commonly isolated bacteria were coagulase-negative staphylococci (38 %) and Staphylococcus aureus (25 %). Surgical procedures included DAIR (50 cases, 69 %) and two-stage exchange (19 cases, 31 %). At last follow-up, five of remaining living 67 patients (7.5 %) had a relapse of infection. The overall relapse-free survival of the prosthesis after 2 years was 92.3 % (95 % confidence interval 82–97 %) with no significant difference between DAIR and exchange of prosthesis.

Conclusion

Our data suggest that an early PJI should be treated with DAIR as a less invasive procedure whenever possible according to the established treatment algorithm.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Kurtz SM, Lau E, Watson H, Schmier JK, Parvizi J. Economic burden of periprosthetic joint infection in the United States. J Arthroplasty. 2012;27:e61.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Zimmerli W, Trampuz A, Ochsner PE. Prosthetic-joint infections. N Engl J Med. 2004;351:1645–54.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Kaltsas DS. Infection after total hip arthroplasty. Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 2004;86:267–71.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Coventry MB. Treatment of infections occurring in total hip surgery. Orthop Clin North Am. 1975;6:991–1003.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Sendi P, Zimmerli W. Diagnosis of periprosthetic joint infections in clinical practice. Int J Artif Organs. 2012;35:913–22.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Peel TN, Cheng AC, Choong PF, Buising KL. Early onset prosthetic hip and knee joint infection: treatment and outcomes in victoria, Australia. J Hosp Infect. 2012;82:248–53.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Osmon DR, Berbari EF, Berendt AR, et al. Diagnosis and management of prosthetic joint infection: clinical practice. Clin Infect Dis. 2013;56:e1–25.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Marculescu CE, Berbari EF, Hanssen AD, et al. Outcome of prosthetic joint infections treated with debridement and retention of components. Clin Infect Dis. 2006;42:471–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Barberan J. Management of infections of osteoarticular prosthesis. Clin Microbiol Infect. 2006;12:93–101.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Achermann Y, Sahin F, Schwyzer H, Kolling C, Wust J, Vogt M. Characteristics and outcome of 16 periprosthetic shoulder joint infections. Infection. 2012;41:613–20.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Achermann Y, Vogt M, Spormann C, et al. Characteristics and outcome of 27 elbow periprosthetic joint infections: results from a 14-year cohort study of 358 elbow prostheses. Clin Microbiol Infect. 2011;17:432–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Betsch BY, Eggli S, Siebenrock KA, Tauber MG, Muhlemann K. Treatment of joint prosthesis infection in accordance with current recommendations improves outcome. Clin Infect Dis. 2008;46:1221–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Lora-Tamayo J, Murillo O, Iribarren JA, et al. A large multicenter study of methicillin-susceptible and methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus prosthetic joint infections managed with implant retention. Clin Infect Dis. 2013;56:182–94.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Zimmerli W, Widmer AF, Blatter M, Frei R, Ochsner PE. Role of rifampin for treatment of orthopedic implant-related staphylococcal infections: a randomized controlled trial. Foreign-body infection (FBI) study group. JAMA. 1998;20:1537–41.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Furustrand TU, Corvec S, Betrisey B, Zimmerli W, Trampuz A. Role of rifampin against Propionibacterium acnes biofilm in vitro and in an experimental foreign-body infection model. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2012;56:1885–91.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Achermann Y, Eigenmann K, Ledergerber B, et al. Factors associated with rifampin resistance in staphylococcal periprosthetic. Infection. 2012;41:431–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Parvizi J, Gehrke T, Chen AF. Proceedings of the international consensus on periprosthetic joint infection. Bone Joint J. 2013;95-b:1450–2.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Sendi P, Banderet F, Graber P, Zimmerli W. Clinical comparison between exogenous and haematogenous periprosthetic joint infections caused by staphylococcus aureus. Clin Microbiol Infect. 2011;17:1098–100.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Del Pozo JL, Patel R. Clinical practice. Infection associated with prosthetic joints. N Engl J Med. 2009;361:787–94.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Matthews PC, Berendt AR, McNally MA, Byren I. Diagnosis and management of prosthetic joint infection. BMJ. 2009;338:b1773.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Choi HR, von Knoch F, Zurakowski D, Nelson SB, Malchau H. Can implant retention be recommended for treatment of infected TKA? Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2011;469:961–9.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Fisman DN, Reilly DT, Karchmer AW, Goldie SJ. Clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of 2 management strategies for infected total hip arthroplasty in the elderly. Clin Infect Dis. 2001;32:419–30.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Westberg M, Grogaard B, Snorrason F. Early prosthetic joint infections treated with debridement and implant retention: 38 primary hip arthroplasties prospectively recorded and followed for median 4 years. Acta Orthop. 2012;83:227–32.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Laffer RR, Graber P, Ochsner PE, Zimmerli W. Outcome of prosthetic knee-associated infection: evaluation of 40 consecutive episodes at a single centre. Clin Microbiol Infect. 2006;12:433–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Giulieri SG, Graber P, Ochsner PE, Zimmerli W. Management of infection associated with total hip arthroplasty according to a treatment algorithm. Infection. 2004;32:222–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Romano CL, Borens O, Monti L, Meani E, Stuyck J. What treatment for periprosthetic shoulder infection? Results from a multicentre retrospective series. Int Orthop. 2012;36:1011–7.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Esposito S, Leone S, Bassetti M, et al. Italian guidelines for the diagnosis and infectious disease management of osteomyelitis and prosthetic joint infections in adults. Infection. 2009;37:478–96.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Farhad R, Roger PM, Albert C, et al. Six weeks antibiotic therapy for all bone infections: results of a cohort study. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 2010;29:217–22.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Bernard L, Legout L, Zurcher-Pfund L, et al. Six weeks of antibiotic treatment is sufficient following surgery for septic arthroplasty. J Infect. 2010;61:125–32.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Hsieh PH, Huang KC, Lee PC, Lee MS. Two-stage revision of infected hip arthroplasty using an antibiotic-loaded spacer: retrospective comparison between short-term and prolonged antibiotic therapy. J Antimicrob Chemother. 2009;64:392–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Puhto AP, Puhto T, Syrjala H. Short-course antibiotics for prosthetic joint infections treated with prosthesis retention. Clin Microbiol Infect. 2012;18:1143–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We thank Werner Zimmerli, M.D. for providing useful comments. This study was supported by a grant of the Hans-Paul Wälchli Foundation for Research (Lugano, Switzerland) and a fellowship grant supported by the Swiss National Science Foundation (Switzerland, PBZHP3_141483).

Conflict of interest

None.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Y. Achermann.

Additional information

Y. Achermann and P. Stasch both contributed equally to this work.

After completion of the study, Y. Achermann relocated to the research laboratory of Mark E. Shirtliff, University of Maryland, Baltimore, USA.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Achermann, Y., Stasch, P., Preiss, S. et al. Characteristics and treatment outcomes of 69 cases with early prosthetic joint infections of the hip and knee. Infection 42, 511–519 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s15010-014-0584-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s15010-014-0584-6

Keywords

Navigation