Frequency of extended-spectrum β-lactamase (ESBL)-producing Gram-negative bacilli in a 200-bed multi-specialty hospital in Vellore district, Tamil Nadu, India
- 219 Downloads
Extended-spectrum β-lactamase (ESBL) producers were reported only from hospital settings previously, but, nowadays, its common presence in community settings is evident from reports. Our primary aim was to assess the frequency of ESBL-producing Gram-negative bacteria (GNB) and their antibiogram pattern among the clinical isolates received during an 8-month time period.
The clinical isolates which belonged to the family Enterobacteriaceae from the clinical specimens were included in the study. These clinical isolates were tested for ESBL production using the double-disk synergy test.
In total, 301 patients were included in this study, of which 146 (48.50 %) were found to harbor strains of ESBL producers. The acquisition of ESBL in relation to age, sex, inhabitancy, inpatients, and outpatients was also analyzed. In our study, 50.29 % of inpatients and 45.86 % of outpatients were found to harbor ESBL producers. The difference between the two groups was not statistically significant. We found five meropenem-resistant ESBL-producing strains among the 146 ESBL producers. Rural inhabitants were found to contain more ESBLs when compared to peri-urban inhabitants.
The study showed a high frequency of ESBLs in both community-acquired and hospital-acquired infections. The frequency of ESBLs was higher among isolates from patients who were from rural populations than those from peri-urban populations. The data on ESBL frequency suggests the need for a rational antibiotic use which would reduce the spread of ESBL-producing members of the family Enterobacteriaceae.
KeywordsESBLs Enterobacteriaceae Antibiotic resistance Rural Peri-urban
- 2.Jacobs RA, Chin-Hong PV. General problems in infectious diseases. In: McPhee SJ, Papadakis MA, Tierney LM, editors. Current medical diagnosis and treatment. 46th ed. New York: Lange; 2007. p. 1311–44.Google Scholar
- 3.Myer RM, Koshi G. Manual of diagnostic procedures in medical microbiology and immunology/serology. Vellore: Christian Medical College and Hospital; 2000. p. 137–62.Google Scholar
- 4.Clinical Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI). Performance standards for antimicrobial susceptibility testing; Twentieth informational supplement. CLSI document M100-S20. Wayne: CLSI; 2010.Google Scholar
- 5.Andrade SS, Jones RN, Gales AC, Sader HS. Increasing prevalence of antimicrobial resistance among Pseudomonas aeruginosa isolates in Latin American medical centres: 5 year report of the SENTRY Antimicrobial Surveillance Program (1997–2001). J Antimicrob Chemother. 2003;52:140–1.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 16.Umadevi S, Kandhakumari G, Joseph NM, et al. Prevalence and antimicrobial susceptibility pattern of ESBL producing Gram negative bacilli. J Clin Diagn Res. 2011;5:236–9.Google Scholar
- 17.Shriyan A, Sheetal R, Nayak N. Aerobic micro-organisms in post-operative wound infections and their antimicrobial susceptibility patterns. J Clin Diagn Res. 2010;4:3392–6.Google Scholar
- 18.Narayanaswamy A, Mallika M. Prevalence and susceptibility of extended spectrum beta-lactamases in urinary isolates of Escherichia coli in a tertiary care hospital Chennai—South India. Internet J Med Update. 2011;6:39–43.Google Scholar
- 19.Metri BC, Jyothi P, Peerapur BV. The prevalence of ESBL among Enterobacteriaceae in a tertiary care hospital of north Karnataka, India. J Clin Diagn Res. 2011;5:470–5.Google Scholar
- 26.Ganguly NK; Global Antibiotic Resistance Partnership—India National Working Group. Situation analysis. Antibiotic use and resistance in India. 2011. http://www.cddep.org/publications/situation_analysis_antibiotic_use_and_resistance_india. Accessed 12 Jul 2011.