Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Contribution of Two Molecular Assays as Compared to Selective Culture for MRSA Screening in a Low MRSA Prevalence Population

  • Clinical and Epidemiological Study
  • Published:
Infection Aims and scope Submit manuscript

An Erratum to this article was published on 03 July 2010

Abstract

Background:

As the prompt detection of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) carriers upon admission is fundamental in the MRSA prevention strategy of our hospital, the infection control team is eagerly seeking the most sensitive and rapid screening method. The aim of this study was to compare the performance of two molecular techniques with a conventional MRSA-selective culture test (Bio-Rad chromogenic MRSASelect) in order to elucidate the suitability of the assays specifically in an expected low MRSA prevalence population.

Patients and Methods:

The anterior nares and throat of 500 patients and visitors attending the emergency department of Sint-Jan General Hospital between May and June 2007 were sampled, and MRSA carriage was determined by selective culture after enrichment and the BD GeneOhmTM StaphSR and the Cepheid XpertTM MRSA assays.

Results:

Eight MRSA carriers were detected by selective culture (1.6% prevalence). The sensitivity, specificity, negative predictive value, and positive predictive value were 62.5, 99.0, 50.0, and 99.4% for BD GeneOhmTM StaphSR and 62.5, 97.7, 31.3, and 99.4% for Cepheid XpertTM MRSA, respectively.

Conclusions:

We conclude that MRSA rapid screening techniques must be interpreted cautiously in a low-prevalence population, as the sensitivity is lower than in selected high-risk populations. MRSA carriers detected with molecular techniques must be confirmed by conventional culture methods for follow-up. The specificity and negative predictive value indicate that molecular rapid methods are worthwhile to be considered in MRSA-preventive strategies.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Malhotra-Kumar S, Haccuria K, Michiels M, Ieven M, Poyart C, Hryniewicz W, Goossens H: Current trends in rapid diagnostics for methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus and glycopeptide-resistant Enterococcus species. J Clin Microbiol 2008; 46: 1577–1587.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Deurenberg RH, Vink C, Sebastian S, Wassenberg MWM, Stobberingh EE: Directe en snelle detectie van meticillineresistente Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA). NTMM 2007; 15: 97–103. Available online at: http://www.nvmm.nl/nvmm/nvmmcms.nsf/uploads/99CE5BC2151216DDC12573C3006C82C9/$FILE/NTMM-2007-3.pdf.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Clinical Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI): Performance standards for antimicrobial disk susceptibility tests, approved standard, 9th edn. CLSI, Wayne, PA, 2006.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Martineau F, Picard FJ, Lansac N, Ménard C, Roy PH, Ouellette M, Bergeron MG: Correlation between the resistance genotype determined by multiplex PCR assays and the antibiotic susceptibility patterns of Staphylococcus aureus and Staphylococcus epidermidis. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 2000; 44: 231–238.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Huletsky A, Giroux R, Rossbach V, Gagnon M, Vaillancourt M, Bernier M, Gagnon F, Truchon K, Bastien M, Picard FJ, van Belkum A, Ouellette M, Roy PH, Bergeron MG: New real-time PCR assay for rapid detection of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus directly from specimens containing a mixture of staphylococci. J Clin Microbiol 2004; 42: 1875–1884.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. de San N, Denis O, Gasasira MF, De Mendonça R, Nonhoff C, Struelens MJ: Controlled evaluation of the IDI-MRSA assay for detection of colonization by methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus in diverse mucocutaneous specimens. J Clin Microbiol 2007; 45: 1098–1101.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Deurenberg RH, Vink C, Kalenic S, Friedrich AW, Bruggeman CA, Stobberingh EE: The molecular evolution of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus. Clin Microbiol Infect 2007; 13: 222–235.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Deurenberg RH, Stobberingh EE: The evolution of Staphylococcus aureus. Infect Genet Evol 2008; 8: 747–763.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Donnio P-Y, Février F, Bifani P, Dehem M, Kervégant C, Wilhelm N, Gautier-Lerestif A-L, Lafforgue N, Cormier M, MR-MSSA Study Group of the Collège de Bactériologie-Virologie-Hygiène des Hôpitaux de France, Le Coustumier A: Molecular and epidemiological evidence for spread of multiresistant methicillin-susceptible Staphylococcus aureus strains in hospitals. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 2007; 51: 4342–4350.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Rupp J, Fenner I, Solbach W, Gieffers J: Be aware of the possibility of false-positive results in single-locus PCR assays for methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus. J Clin Microbio 2006; 44: 2317.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Martens K, De Beenhouwer H, Frans J, Van den Abeele A, Cartuyvels R, Coppens G, on Behalf of the Bilulu Study Group: Evaluation of eSwab® for surveillance of MRSA by Xpert MRSA® and culture on pooled samples. 19th European Congress of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases, Helsinki, Finland, May 2009, abstract no. P797.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to E. Nulens.

Additional information

An erratum to this article is available at http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s15010-010-0041-0.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Nulens, E., Descheemaeker, P., Deurenberg, R.H. et al. Contribution of Two Molecular Assays as Compared to Selective Culture for MRSA Screening in a Low MRSA Prevalence Population. Infection 38, 98–101 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s15010-009-9117-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s15010-009-9117-0

Keywords

Navigation