Abstract
Background:
In Germany, the cost for PCR diagnosis of influenza in ambulant patients was not covered by the national statutory health insurance system until 2008. Therefore, cell culture was the standard method applied for routine diagnosis. We have prospectively compared a 1-day rapid cell culture assay (RCA) with conventional cell culture (CCC) during the influenza seasons from 1997/1998 to 2007/2008 and with real-time PCR analysis during the influenza seasons 2003/2004 and 2006/2007.
Patients and Methods:
This study is based on 4,262 respiratory samples obtained from ambulant patients between January 1998 and May 2008. The RCA was performed in microtiter plates that were stained with monoclonal antibodies to influenza virus A and B 16 h after inoculation.
Results:
A total of 1,221 specimens were found to be positive by the cell culture methods – 1,143 (93.6%) by the RCA and 1,012 (82.9%) by the CCC. The sensitivity of the RCA and CCC versus PCR was 75.4% (221/293) and 58% (170/293), respectively. The specificity of both cell culture assays versus PCR was 100%. Influenza A represented 79.3% of the cases diagnosed. An increased activity of influenza was observed between January and March, with the rate of influenza-positive cases being highest for kindergarten and school-aged children.
Conclusion:
While PCR is the most sensitive assay for the diagnosis of influenza, the RCA can still be used for diagnosis and surveillance of this disease. Based on our findings and given the known fact that influenza antibodies reach a plateau 2–4 weeks after immunization, the optimal time for vaccination in Germany is from October through November. Kindergarten and school-aged children represent an important reservoir of infection. Consequently, routine immunization should be considered for this age group to prevent the spread of influenza.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Drinka P: Experience with the rapid directigen test for influenza. J Am Med Dir Assoc 2006; 7: 37–39.
Smit M, Beynon K, Murdoch D, Jennings L: Comparison of the NOW Influenza A & B, NOW Flu A, NOW Flu B, and Directigen Flu A+B assays, and immunofluorescence with viral culture for the detection of influenza A and B viruses. Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis 2007; 57: 67–70.
Zambon M, Hays J, Webster A, Newman R, Keene O: Diagnosis of influenza in the community: relationship of clinical diagnosis to confirmed virological, serologic, or molecular detection of influenza. Arch Intern Med 2001; 161: 2116–2122.
Steininger C, Kundi M, Aberle SW, Aberle JH, Popow-Kraupp T: Effectiveness of reverse transcription-PCR, virus isolation, and enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay for diagnosis of influenza A virus infection in different age groups. J Clin Microbiol 2002; 40: 2051–2056.
Leitmeyer K, Buchholz U, Kramer M, Schweiger B: Enhancing the predictive value of throat swabs in virological influenza surveillance. Euro Surveill 2002; 7: 180–183.
Mizuta K, Abiko C, Aoki Y, Suto A, Hoshina H, Itagaki T, Katsushima N, Matsuzaki Y, Hongo S, Noda M, Kimura H, Ootani K: Analysis of monthly isolation of respiratory viruses from children by cell culture using a microplate method: a two-year study from 2004 to 2005 in Yamagata, Japan. Jpn J Infect Dis 2008; 61: 196–201.
Kim JS, Kim SH, Bae SY, Lim CS, Kim YK, Lee KN, Lee CK: Enhanced detection of respiratory viruses using cryopreserved R-Mix Ready Cells. J Clin Virol 2008; 42: 264–267.
Oh DY, Barr IG, Mosse JA, Laurie KL: MDCK SIAT-1 cells show improved isolation rates for recent human influenza viruses compared to conventional MDCK cells. J Clin Microbiol 2008; 46: 2189–2194.
Ziegler T, Hall H, Sánchez-Fauquier A, Gamble WC, Cox NJ: Type- and subtype-specific detection of influenza viruses in clinical specimens by rapid culture assay. J Clin Microbiol 1995; 33: 318–321.
Ueda M, Maeda A, Nakagawa N, Kase T, Kubota R, Takakura H, Ohshima A, Okuno Y: Application of subtype-specific monoclonal antibodies for rapid detection and identification of influenza A and B viruses. J Clin Microbiol 1998; 36: 340–344.
Ward CL, Dempsey MH, Ring CJ, Kempson RE, Zhang L, Gor D, Snowden BW, Tisdale M: Design and performance testing of quantitative real time PCR assays for influenza A and B viral load measurement. J Clin Virol 2004; 29: 179–188.
Cooper N, Sutton A, Abrams K, Wailoo A, Turner D, Nicholson K: Effectiveness of neuraminidase inhibitors in treatment and prevention of influenza A and B: systematic review and metaanalyses of randomised controlled trials. Br Med J 2003; 326: 1–7.
Seno M, Kanamoto Y, Takao S, Takei N, Fukuda S, Umisa H: Enhancing effect of centrifugation on isolation of influenza virus from clinical specimens. J Clin Microbiol 1990; 28: 1669–1670.
Woods GL, Johnson AM: Rapid 24-well plate centrifugation assay for detection of influenza A virus in clinical specimens. J Virol Methods 1989; 24: 35–42.
Brumback BG, Cunningham DM, Morris MV, Villavicencio JL: Rapid culture for influenza virus, types A and B, in 96-well plates. Clin Diagn Virol 1995; 4: 251–256.
LaSala PR, Bufton KK, Ismail N, Smith MB: Prospective comparison of R-mix shell vial system with direct antigen tests and conventional cell culture for respiratory virus detection. J Clin Virol 2007; 38: 210–216.
Zitterkopf NL, Leekha S, Espy MJ, Wood CM, Sampathkumar P, Smith TF: Relevance of influenza a virus detection by PCR, shell vial assay, and tube cell culture to rapid reporting procedures. J Clin Microbiol 2006; 44: 3366–3367.
Mills RD, Cain KJ, Woods GL: Detection ofinfluenza virus by centrifugal inoculation of MDCK cells and staining with monoclonal antibodies. J Clin Microbiol 1989; 27: 2505–2508.
Weinberg A, Mettenbrink CJ, Ye D, Yang CF: Sensitivity of diagnostic tests for influenza varies with the circulating strains. J Clin Virol 2005; 33: 172–175.
Hoeven AM vd, Scholing M, Wever PC, Fijnheer R, Hermans M, Schneeberger PM: Lack of discriminating signs and symptoms in clinical diagnosis of influenza of patients admitted to the hospital. Infection 2007; 35: 65–68.
Ruest A, Michaud S, Deslandes S, Frost EH: Comparison of the Directigen flu A+B test, the QuickVue influenza test, and clinical case definition to viral culture and reverse transcription-PCR for rapid diagnosis of influenza virus infection. J Clin Microbiol 2003; 41: 3487–3493.
Finkelman BS, Viboud C, Koelle K, Ferrari MJ, Bharti N, Grenfell BT: Global patterns in seasonal activity of influenza A/H3N2, A/H1N1, and B from 1997 to 2005: viral coexistence and latitudinal gradients. PLoS ONE 2007; 2: e1296.
Robert Koch-Institut (RKI): Saisonberichte 1997/1998–2007/2008, Arbeitsgemeinschaft Influenza (AGI). Available at: http://influenza.rki.de/index.html?c=saisonbericht.
de Jong JC, Palache AM, Beyer WE, Rimmelzwaan GF, Boon AC, Osterhaus AD: Haemagglutination-inhibiting antibody to influenza virus. Dev Biol (Basel) 2003; 115: 63–73.
Buchholz U, Robert Koch-Institut (RKI): WHO-Influenza-Impfziele 2010: Wo steht Deutschland, und was ist noch zu tun? 2008.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Terletskaia-Ladwig, E., Eggers, M., Meier, S. et al. Laboratory-based assessment of influenza in German ambulant patients from 1998 to 2008. Infection 37, 401–406 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s15010-009-8434-7
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s15010-009-8434-7