Skip to main content

Quantitative Antibiotic Use in Hospitals: Comparison of Measurements, Literature Review, and Recommendations for a Standard of Reporting

Infection volume 36, pages 549–559 (2008)Cite this article

Abstract

Background:

Reports on antibiotic use often lack complete definitions of the units of measurement, hampering the comparison of data between hospitals or hospital units.

Patients and Methods:

To compare methods of measures of in-hospital antimicrobial use, we determined aggregate in-hospital consumption data at a tertiary care university hospital using variations of nominators and denominators. Means of defined daily doses (DDD) of individual antimicrobials per 100 bed-days and per 100 admissions at each hospital and intensive care unit (ICU) were calculated. Furthermore, a literature review was performed for benchmarking purposes.

Results:

Antibiotic use in different hospital units ranged from 0.105 to 323.37 DDD/100 bed-days and from 4.23 to 6737.92 DDD/100 admissions, respectively. Including the day of discharge in the denominator ‘bed-days’ underestimated antibiotic use in various hospital wards by up to 27.7 DDD/100 bed-days (26.0%). Equating ‘numbers of patients admitted to the hospital’ and ‘numbers of admissions’ on a hospital level resulted in a difference of 192.6 DDD/100 admissions (64%) because patients transferred between hospital units accounted for multiple admissions. Likewise, reporting antimicrobial (Anatomical Therapeutic Chemical [ATC] group ‘J’) instead of antibiotic (ATC group ‘J01’) use led to a difference of 16.5 DDD/100 bed-days (19.3%). The literature review revealed underreporting of complete definitions of antibiotic use measurements.

Conclusions:

Data on in-hospital antimicrobial use vary widely not only due to different antibiotic policies at different institutions but also due to different methods of measures. Adherence to the standard of reporting the methods of measurement is warranted for benchmarking and promotion of rational antimicrobial use.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Access options

Buy single article

Instant access to the full article PDF.

43,34 €

Price includes VAT (Finland)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

References

  1. Barbosa da Silva JJ, Siqueira JB Jr, Coelho GE, Vilarinhos PTR, Pimenta FG Jr: Dengue in Brazil, current situation and prevention and control activities. Epidemiol Bull 2002; 23: 3–6.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Siqueira JB, Martelli CMT, Maciel IJ, Oliveira RM, Ribeiro MG, Amorim FP, Moreira BC, Cardoso DDP, Souza WV, Andrade ALSS: Household survey of dengue infection in central Brazil: spatial point pattern analysis and risk factors assessment. Am J Trop Med Hyg 2004; 71: 646–651.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Teixeira MG, Barreto ML, Costa MC, Ferreira LD, Vasconcelos PF, Cairncross S: Dynamics of dengue virus circulation: a silent epidemic in a complex urban area. Trop Med Int Health 2002; 7: 757–762.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Vasconcelos PF, Lima JW, Rosa AP, Timbo MJ, Rosa ES, Lima HR, Rodrigues SG, Rosa JF: Dengue epidemic in Fortaleza, Ceara: randomized seroepidemiologic survey. Rev Saude Publica 1998; 32: 447–454.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Dietz VJ, Gubler DJ, Rigau-Perez JG, Pinheiro F, Schatzmayr HG, Bailey R, Gunn RA: Epidemic dengue 1 in Brazil, 1986: evaluation of a clinically based dengue surveillance system. Am J Epidemiol 1990; 131: 693–701.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Marzochi KBF: Endemic dengue: surveillance strategy challenges. Rev Soc Bras Med Trop 2004; 375: 413–415.

    Google Scholar 

  7. De Simone TS, Nogueira RM, Araujo ES, Guimarães FR, Santos FB, Souza RV, Teixeira-Filho G, Miagostovich MP: Dengue virus surveillance: theco-circulationof Den-1,Den-2andDen-3intheStateof Rio de Janeiro, Brazil. Trans R Soc TropMed Hyg 2004; 98: 553–562.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Nunes-Araújo FRF, Ferreira MS, Nishioka S de A: Dengue fever in Brazilian adults and children: assessment of clinical findings and their validity for diagnosis. Ann Trop Med Parasitol 2003;97: 415–419.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Martinez-Vega RA, Diaz-Quijano FA, Villar-Centeno LA: Low concordance between early clinical suspicion of dengue and its serological confirmation. Rev Med Chil 2006; 134: 1153–1160.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Diaz FA, Martinez RA, Villar LA: Clinical criteria to diagnose dengue in its early stages. Biomedica 2006; 26: 22–30.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Passos MNP, Santos LMG, Pereira MRR, Casali CG, Fortes BMD, Ortiz Valencia LI, Alexandre A de J, Medronho R de A: Clinical differences observed in patients with dengue caused by different serotypes in the epidemic of 2001/2002, occurred in Rio de Janeiro. Rev Soc Bras Med Trop 2004; 37: 293–295.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Casali CG, Pereira MRR, Santos LMG, Passos MNP, Fortes BMD, Ortiz Valencia LIO, Alexandre AJ, Medronho RA: The epidemic of dengue and hemorrhagic dengue fever in the city of Rio de Janeiro, 2001/2002. Rev Soc Bras Med Trop 2004; 37:296–299.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Martinez RA, Diaz FA, Villar LA: Evaluación de la definición Clínica de dengue sugerida por la Organización Mundial de la Salud. Biomédica 2004; 25: 412–416.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Phuong HL, de Vries PJ, Nga TTT, Giao PT, Hung LQ, Binh TQ, Nguyen VN, Nagelkerke N, Kager PA: Dengue as a cause of acute undifferentiated fever in Vietnam. BMC Infect Dis 2006; 6: 123.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Kuno G: Serodiagnosis of flavivirus infection and vaccination in humans. Adv Virus Res 2003; 61: 3–65.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Bandyopadhyay S, Lum LCS, Kroeger A: Classifying dengue: a review of the difficulties in using the WHO case classification for dengue haemorrhagic fever. Trop Med Int Health 2006; 11:1238–1255.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Brasil MS, Fundação Nacional de Saúde: Dengue. In: Guia de vigilância epidemiológica. FUNASA, Brasília 2002, pp 201–230.

    Google Scholar 

  18. WHO: Dengue haemorrahagic fever: diagnosis, treatment, prevention and control. (2nd edn.). World Health Organization, Geneva, 1997.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Nogueira RMR, Schatzmayr HG, de Filippis AMB, dos Santos FB, da Cunha RV, Coelho JO, de Souza LJ, Guimarães FR, de Araújo ESM, De Simone TS, Baran M, Teixeira G Jr, Miagostovich MP: Dengue virus type 3, Brazil, 2002. Emerg Infect Dis 2002; 11:1376–1381.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Gubler DJ, Kuno G, Sather GE, Valez M, Oliver A: Mosquito cell cultures and specific monoclonal antibodies in surveillance for dengue viruses. Am J Trop Med Hyg 1984; 33: 158–165.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Martinez-Torres E: Preventing deaths from dengue: a space and challenge for primary health care. Rev Panam Salud Publica 2006; 20: 60–74.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Low JG OEE, Tolfvenstam T, Leo YS, Hibberd ML, Ng LC, Lai YL, Yap GS, Li CS, Vasudevan SG, Ong A: Early dengue infection and outcome study (EDEN) - study design and preliminary findings. Ann Acad Med Singapore 2006; 35: 783–789.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Guzmán MG, Kouri G: Dengue, an update. Lancet Infect Dis 2002; 2: 33–42.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Hudson CP, Levett PN, Edwards CN, Moosai R, Roach TC: Severe primary HIV-1 infection among black persons in Barbados. Int J STD AIDS 1997; 8: 393–397.

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Telles EE: Racial ambiguity among the Brazilian population. Ethn Racial Stud 2002; 25: 415–441.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Calisher CH, Karabatsos N, Dalrymple JM, Shope RE, Porterfield JS, Westaway EG, Brandt WE: Antigenic relationships between flaviviruses as determined by cross-neutralization tests with polyclonal antisera. J Gen Virol 1989; 70: 37–43.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Gubler DJ: Dengue and dengue hemorrhagic fever. Clin Microbiol Rev 1998; 11: 480–496.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Gibbons RV, Vaughn DW: Dengue: an escalating problem. BMJ 2002; 324: 1563–1566.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Travassos C, Williams DR: The concept and measurement of race and their relationship to public health: a review focused on Brazil and the United States. Cad Saude Publica 2004; 20: 660–678.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Bossuyt PM, Reitsma JB, Bruns DE, Gatsonis CA, Glasziou PP, Irwig LM, Lijmer JG, Moher D, Rennie D, Vet HC: Standards for reporting of diagnostic accuracy. Towards complete and accurate reporting of studies of diagnostic accuracy: the STARD initiative. BMJ 2003; 326: 41–44.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Affiliations

  1. Division of Infectious Diseases and Hospital Epidemiology, University Hospital Zurich, Rämistrasse 100, CH-8091, Zurich, Switzerland

    S. P. Kuster, C. Ruef, B. Ledergerber & R. Weber

  2. Cantonal Pharmacy, Zurich, Switzerland

    A. Hintermann & C. Deplazes

  3. SAP Customer Competence Center, University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland

    L. Neuber

Authors
  1. S. P. Kuster
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. C. Ruef
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. B. Ledergerber
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. A. Hintermann
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. C. Deplazes
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. L. Neuber
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. R. Weber
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to R. Weber.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Kuster, S.P., Ruef, C., Ledergerber, B. et al. Quantitative Antibiotic Use in Hospitals: Comparison of Measurements, Literature Review, and Recommendations for a Standard of Reporting. Infection 36, 549–559 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s15010-008-7462-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s15010-008-7462-z

Keywords

  • Intensive Care Unit
  • Anatomical Therapeutic Chemical
  • Hospital Unit
  • Antibiotic Consumption
  • Infect Control Hosp